Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Tob Control. 2019 May;28(3):352-355. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054622. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rule-making for reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to a minimally addictive level. Very little is known about whether use of very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes affects support for a nicotine reduction policy.
This study examined the effects of using VLNC versus usual brand (UB) cigarettes on support for a nicotine reduction policy and determined whether participant characteristics and responses to VLNC cigarettes were associated with policy support.
Participants from a cigarette trial who were assigned to either 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco research cigarettes or their UB for 6 weeks were asked about their support for the policy. χ tests were used to compare support for the policy between cigarette conditions and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess covariates associated with policy support.
Policy support did not differ by condition. After 6 weeks of using VLNC cigarettes, 50% of participants supported the policy, 26% opposed and 24% responded 'Don't Know'. Support was higher among those adherent to smoking only VLNC cigarettes (65%) compared with those who were non-adherent (44%). Older participants and those interested in quitting had increased odds of support. Cigarette satisfaction, perceived harm and perceived nicotine content were not significantly associated with support.
Smoking VLNC cigarettes did not affect support for a nicotine reduction policy. Understanding predictors of policy support and opposition will help public health officials to maximise the public health acceptance and impact of this policy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01681875 Post-Results).
美国食品和药物管理局最近发布了一项关于将香烟中的尼古丁含量降低到最低成瘾水平的预先通知,提议制定规则。对于使用极低尼古丁含量(VLNC)香烟是否会影响对减少尼古丁政策的支持,人们知之甚少。
本研究考察了使用 VLNC 与常用品牌(UB)香烟对减少尼古丁政策支持的影响,并确定参与者的特征和对 VLNC 香烟的反应是否与政策支持相关。
来自一项香烟试验的参与者,他们被分配到 0.4mg 尼古丁/克烟草研究香烟或他们的 UB 中,为期 6 周,被问及他们对该政策的支持。使用 χ2 检验比较两种香烟条件下的政策支持,使用逻辑回归分析评估与政策支持相关的协变量。
政策支持在两种条件之间没有差异。在使用 VLNC 香烟 6 周后,50%的参与者支持该政策,26%反对,24%表示“不知道”。与不遵守只吸 VLNC 香烟的参与者(44%)相比,遵守只吸 VLNC 香烟的参与者(65%)对该政策的支持率更高。年龄较大的参与者和有戒烟意愿的参与者支持的可能性更高。吸烟满意度、感知危害和感知尼古丁含量与支持没有显著关联。
吸 VLNC 香烟不会影响对减少尼古丁政策的支持。了解政策支持和反对的预测因素将有助于公共卫生官员最大限度地提高公众对该政策的接受度和影响(临床试验注册号:NCT01681875 结果公布后)。