Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Cancer Control and Prevention, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Prev Med. 2021 Aug;149:106600. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106600. Epub 2021 May 3.
As governments consider policy action to reduce smoking, a key factor in creating political will is the level of public support, particularly among smokers who are most affected by the policies. The goal of this paper is to assess and compare the level of support in Canada, the United States, England, and Australia for five smoking control policies: 1) banning menthol in cigarettes, 2) banning cigarette additives, 3) reducing nicotine in cigarettes to make them less addictive, 4) raising the minimum age to purchase cigarettes to 21 years and older, and 5) requiring pictorial warning labels on cigarette packs (examined in the US only). Data for these analyses come from 8165 daily cigarette smokers who responded to the 2016 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. In all countries, the highest level of support was for raising the legal age for purchase to 21 years and older (62-70%) and reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes to make them less addictive (57-70%). Smokers who were less dependent on cigarettes and those expressing interest in quitting were more likely to support all policies. When asked how they would respond to a nicotine reduction policy, the most common response given was to try the non-nicotine cigarettes to see how they liked them (42-48%), with the next most common response being to quit smoking entirely (16-24%). The high level of support for these proposed policies among daily smokers provides important evidence for policymakers to counteract claims that such policies would be unpopular.
随着各国政府考虑采取政策措施来减少吸烟,一个关键的政策制定因素是公众支持度,尤其是在最受政策影响的吸烟者中。本文的目的是评估和比较加拿大、美国、英国和澳大利亚对五项控烟政策的支持水平:1)禁止薄荷醇香烟;2)禁止香烟添加剂;3)降低香烟中的尼古丁含量以降低其成瘾性;4)将购买香烟的最低年龄提高到 21 岁及以上;5)在香烟包装上使用图形警示标签(仅在美国进行研究)。这些分析的数据来自于 8165 名每天吸烟的吸烟者,他们对 2016 年国际烟草控制四国吸烟和电子烟调查进行了回应。在所有国家,支持度最高的政策是将购买香烟的法定年龄提高到 21 岁及以上(62-70%)和降低香烟中的尼古丁含量以减少其成瘾性(57-70%)。对香烟依赖程度较低且有戒烟意愿的吸烟者更有可能支持所有政策。当被问及他们将如何应对尼古丁降低政策时,最常见的回答是尝试非尼古丁香烟,看看他们是否喜欢(42-48%),其次是完全戒烟(16-24%)。这些政策在每天吸烟的人群中得到了高度支持,为政策制定者提供了重要的证据,以反驳这些政策不受欢迎的说法。