Suppr超能文献

线性回归中贝叶斯因子的零分布

On the Null Distribution of Bayes Factors in Linear Regression.

作者信息

Zhou Quan, Guan Yongtao

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine.

出版信息

J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1362-1371. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1328361. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Abstract

We show that under the null, the 2 log(Bayes factor) is asymptotically distributed as a weighted sum of chi-squared random variables with a shifted mean. This claim holds for Bayesian multi-linear regression with a family of conjugate priors, namely, the normal-inverse-gamma prior, the g-prior, and the normal prior. Our results have three immediate impacts. First, we can compute analytically a p-value associated with a Bayes factor without the need of permutation. We provide a software package that can evaluate the p-value associated with Bayes factor efficiently and accurately. Second, the null distribution is illuminating to some intrinsic properties of Bayes factor, namely, how Bayes factor quantitatively depends on prior and the genesis of Bartlett's paradox. Third, enlightened by the null distribution of Bayes factor, we formulate a novel scaled Bayes factor that depends less on the prior and is immune to Bartlett's paradox. When two tests have an identical p-value, the test with a larger power tends to have a larger scaled Bayes factor, a desirable property that is missing for the (unscaled) Bayes factor.

摘要

我们证明,在原假设下,2倍对数贝叶斯因子渐近地服从均值有偏移的卡方随机变量加权和的分布。这一结论适用于具有共轭先验族的贝叶斯多元线性回归,即正态-逆伽马先验、g先验和正态先验。我们的结果有三个直接影响。首先,我们可以解析地计算与贝叶斯因子相关的p值,而无需进行排列检验。我们提供了一个软件包,它可以高效且准确地评估与贝叶斯因子相关的p值。其次,原假设分布揭示了贝叶斯因子的一些内在属性,即贝叶斯因子如何定量地依赖于先验以及巴特利特悖论的成因。第三,受贝叶斯因子原假设分布的启发,我们提出了一种新颖的缩放贝叶斯因子,它对先验的依赖较小,并且不受巴特利特悖论的影响。当两个检验具有相同的p值时,功效较大的检验往往具有较大的缩放贝叶斯因子,这是(未缩放的)贝叶斯因子所缺乏的理想属性。

相似文献

1
On the Null Distribution of Bayes Factors in Linear Regression.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1362-1371. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1328361. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
2
Unscaled Bayes factors for multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):1030-43. doi: 10.1177/0962280212437827. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
4
5
Bayes factors for testing inequality constrained hypotheses: Issues with prior specification.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Feb;67(1):153-71. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12013. Epub 2013 May 18.
8
An empirical evaluation of various priors in the empirical Bayes estimation of small area disease risks.
Stat Med. 2000;19(17-18):2409-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000915/30)19:17/18<2409::aid-sim578>3.0.co;2-u.
9
Prior sensitivity of null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
Psychol Methods. 2022 Oct;27(5):804-821. doi: 10.1037/met0000292. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflection Knockoffs via Householder Reflection: Applications in Proteomics and Genetic Fine Mapping.
bioRxiv. 2025 May 29:2025.01.16.633369. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.16.633369.
2
Abundant Parent-of-origin Effect eQTL: The Framingham Heart Study.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 4:2024.06.05.597677. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.05.597677.
3
The Bayesian lens and Bayesian blinkers.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 May 15;381(2247):20220144. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0144. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
Wavelet Screening identifies regions highly enriched for differentially methylated loci for orofacial clefts.
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2021 May 3;3(2):lqab035. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab035. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
BayesSMILES: Bayesian Segmentation Modeling for Longitudinal Epidemiological Studies.
medRxiv. 2021 Jan 18:2020.10.06.20208132. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.06.20208132.
7
Fast Model-Fitting of Bayesian Variable Selection Regression Using the Iterative Complex Factorization Algorithm.
Bayesian Anal. 2019 Jun;14(2):573-594. doi: 10.1214/18-BA1120. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
8
Functional annotation and Bayesian fine-mapping reveals candidate genes for important agronomic traits in Holstein bulls.
Commun Biol. 2019 Jun 18;2:212. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0454-y. eCollection 2019.
9
Fast Bayesian inference in large Gaussian graphical models.
Biometrics. 2019 Dec;75(4):1288-1298. doi: 10.1111/biom.13064. Epub 2019 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Zellweger spectrum disorders: clinical overview and management approach.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Dec 1;10:151. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0368-9.
2
A statistical approach for rare-variant association testing in affected sibships.
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Apr 2;96(4):543-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
False Discovery Control in Large-Scale Spatial Multiple Testing.
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2015 Jan 1;77(1):59-83. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12064.
5
The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review.
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192.
6
Detecting local haplotype sharing and haplotype association.
Genetics. 2014 Jul;197(3):823-38. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.164814. Epub 2014 May 8.
7
Scientific method: statistical errors.
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):150-2. doi: 10.1038/506150a.
8
Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis of intraocular pressure.
Hum Genet. 2014 Jan;133(1):41-57. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1349-5. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
10
Common genetic determinants of intraocular pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma.
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(5):e1002611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002611. Epub 2012 May 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验