Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília (UnB)-Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, D.F., Brazil.
Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília (UnB)-Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, D.F., Brazil.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0204460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204460. eCollection 2018.
The demand for insect-pollinated crops is increasing. Conventional agricultural intensification heavily relies on increased input of fertilizers, which can have negative effects on local biodiversity. Such effects may be particularly accentuated in biodiversity hotspots that are naturally nutrient-poor. Ecological intensification of farming, i.e. practices that increase production through the increase of ecosystem services, emerges as an alternative to conventional intensification. For example, practices that boost abundance and diversity of crop pollinators can lead to substantial increases in cropland productivity. However, little is known about the synergisms and trade-offs between fertilizer input and such ecological intensification practices. Here we investigate interactive effects between fertilization practices and the provision of ecosystem services in a biodiversity hotspot where conventional agriculture is rapidly expanding (Brazilian savannas). We focus on a highly nitrogen-demanding crop species that benefits from pollinators (the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.), for which nitrogen input greatly varies in the study region. Our findings show that positive effects of native pollinators on crop yield are most accentuated under low inputs of nitrogen (e.g. equal to or below 72kg ha-1). This interactive effect could be due to changes in flower visitor community composition or behaviour. Our study also suggests that landscape management practices that minimize isolation from patches of natural vegetation and maximize its cover nearby (within 500 meters) of production areas can increase pollinator and biocontrol agent abundance and richness. Overall, these results suggest that ecological intensification is a valuable alternative for common bean production in Brazil, and potentially other regions of the world. Land productivity can be enhanced if an adequate balance of chemical inputs and landscape management is achieved.
对传粉昆虫授粉作物的需求正在增加。传统的农业集约化严重依赖于化肥投入的增加,这可能对当地生物多样性产生负面影响。这种影响在自然养分贫瘠的生物多样性热点地区可能尤为突出。通过增加生态系统服务来提高农业生态集约化水平,是对传统集约化的一种替代。例如,增加作物传粉者丰度和多样性的做法,可以显著提高农田生产力。然而,对于化肥投入与这种生态集约化实践之间的协同作用和权衡关系,人们知之甚少。在这里,我们在一个生物多样性热点地区(巴西草原)研究了施肥实践与生态系统服务提供之间的相互作用,该地区传统农业正在迅速扩张。我们专注于一种对氮素需求很高的传粉者受益作物物种(普通菜豆,Phaseolus vulgaris L.),在研究区域内,这种作物的氮素投入差异很大。我们的研究结果表明,在氮素投入较低的情况下(例如,等于或低于 72kg ha-1),本地传粉者对作物产量的积极影响最为明显。这种交互作用可能是由于花访客群落组成或行为的变化所致。我们的研究还表明,景观管理实践可以最大限度地减少与自然植被斑块的隔离,并最大限度地增加其在生产区域附近(500 米内)的覆盖面积,从而增加传粉者和生物防治剂的丰度和丰富度。总体而言,这些结果表明,生态集约化是巴西普通豆生产的一种有价值的替代方案,在世界其他地区也可能如此。如果能够实现化学投入和景观管理的适当平衡,土地生产力就可以得到提高。