Goff Anthony J, Page William S, Clark Nicholas C
Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Drive, 138683, Singapore.
Faculty of Sport, Health and Applied Sciences, St Mary's University, Waldegrave Road, Twickenham, TW1 4SX, UK.
Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Nov;34:227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Strength training acute programme variables (APVs) can impact tibiofemoral joint injury outcomes. Exercise descriptors (EDs; e.g. patient-position) specify configurations within which APVs are applied. Evidence-based practice depends on adequate reporting of APVs and EDs to replicate strength training interventions in clinical practice. This systematic review assessed APV and ED reporting for adults with tibiofemoral joint injury (anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)/medial collateral ligament (MCL)/lateral collateral ligament (LCL)/meniscus/hyaline cartilage (HC)).
PRISMA guidelines were followed. Specific key-term combinations were employed and database searches performed. Descriptive/observational/experimental studies were included (2006-2018). Studies needed to report pre-defined APVs or EDs for ≥51% of all exercises to be included. Frequency counts were made of studies adequately reporting APVs and EDs.
Sixteen articles were included (ACL = 13; meniscus = 3). No PCL/MCL/LCL/HC articles were identified. Of nine APVs, five and four were consistently reported by the majority of ACL (≥7) and meniscal (≥2) studies, respectively. Of eight EDs, four were consistently reported by the majority of both ACL (≥8) and meniscal (≥2) studies.
Many APVs and EDs were not adequately reported. Future studies should better document APVs and EDs for higher standards of intervention reporting and enhanced translation of research to clinical practice.
力量训练急性方案变量(APV)会影响胫股关节损伤结局。运动描述符(ED;例如患者体位)规定了应用APV的配置。循证实践依赖于对APV和ED进行充分报告,以便在临床实践中复制力量训练干预措施。本系统评价评估了胫股关节损伤(前交叉韧带(ACL)/后交叉韧带(PCL)/内侧副韧带(MCL)/外侧副韧带(LCL)/半月板/透明软骨(HC))成人患者的APV和ED报告情况。
遵循PRISMA指南。采用特定的关键术语组合并进行数据库检索。纳入描述性/观察性/实验性研究(2006 - 2018年)。研究需报告所有练习中≥51%的预定义APV或ED才能被纳入。对充分报告APV和ED的研究进行频数统计。
纳入16篇文章(ACL = 13;半月板 = 3)。未检索到PCL/MCL/LCL/HC相关文章。在9个APV中,大多数ACL(≥7)和半月板(≥2)研究分别一致报告了其中5个和4个。在8个ED中,大多数ACL(≥8)和半月板(≥2)研究一致报告了其中4个。
许多APV和ED未得到充分报告。未来研究应更好地记录APV和ED,以提高干预报告标准,并加强研究成果向临床实践的转化。