• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FDA 对 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体临床试验中转移性非小细胞肺癌老年患者生存情况的分析。

FDA analyses of survival in older adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies.

机构信息

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA.

出版信息

Semin Oncol. 2018 Aug;45(4):220-225. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.08.007
PMID:30391014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 70% occur in those above 65 years of age and more than half are metastatic or locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses pooling data across 4 randomized clinical trials comparing programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) to docetaxel for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with disease progression on or after a platinum-containing therapy were conducted. Demographics, efficacy, and safety data from these trials were pooled and aggregated based on age. The relative treatment effects on overall survival (OS) across age groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. A meta-analysis was performed comparing OS across age groups treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies compared with those treated with docetaxel, as a common control arm across trials. A Cox Proportional Hazards model, stratified by clinical trial, was used and a univariate and multivariate adjusted analysis of OS to further identify trends in efficacy across age groups.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies enrolled across the 4 clinical trials, 42% were >65 years of age, 99% had ECOG performance status of 0-1, 75% had received 1 prior therapy, and 76% were diagnosed with Stage IV disease. In the pooled analysis of 2,824 patients across both arms, the treatment effects in age-defined subgroups were similar, with a hazard ratios (HR), unadjusted or adjusted, for OS of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.63, 0.80) in patients <65 years and 0.66 (0.57, 0.76) in patients ≥65 years of age. In patients ≥70 years, the HR for OS was 0.67 (0.55. 0.82) and in patients ≥ 75 years, the HR was 0.81 (0.58, 1.13). Estimated median OS in patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies versus docetaxel was 14.5 months versus 8.8 months in patients <65 years, 14.2 months versus 9 months in patients ≥65 years, 14.1 versus 9.2 months in patients ≥70 years, and 14.7 versus 9.5 months in the patients ≥75years. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies were less frequent in patients ≥75 years (23%) compared to patients> 65 year ( 49%) and <65 years (47%), as were serious adverse events (30%, 32.5%, 15%); however, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment (7%, 7%, and 5%) in those subgroups ≤65 years, >65 years, and >75 years, respectively, were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients 65 and older with advanced and metastatic NSCLC, including those ≥75 years, seem to derive similar survival benefits from treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies as patients <65 years of age. Patients 75 and older enrolled on these trials appear to tolerate PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies and have a lower incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events compared to the subgroup of patients <65 years of age.

摘要

背景

在新诊断的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,约 70%发生在 65 岁以上的人群中,超过一半为转移性或局部晚期 NSCLC。

方法

对 4 项比较程序性死亡 1 受体(PD-1)或程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)与多西他赛治疗晚期或转移性 NSCLC 患者的随机临床试验的数据进行回顾性分析,这些患者在含铂化疗后疾病进展。根据年龄对这些试验的人口统计学、疗效和安全性数据进行汇总和分组。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法评估各年龄组患者的总生存期(OS)的相对治疗效果。对 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体治疗与多西他赛治疗的患者进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估各年龄组之间的 OS 差异,多西他赛作为各试验的共同对照药物。采用 Cox 比例风险模型,按临床试验分层,并对 OS 进行单因素和多因素调整分析,以进一步确定各年龄组之间的疗效趋势。

结果

在参加这 4 项临床试验的 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体治疗的患者中,42%年龄大于 65 岁,99%患者的 ECOG 体能状态为 0-1,75%接受过 1 线治疗,76%诊断为 IV 期疾病。在对两个治疗组共 2824 例患者的汇总分析中,年龄定义亚组的治疗效果相似,未经调整或调整后的 OS 风险比(HR)在<65 岁的患者中为 0.71(95%置信区间为 0.63,0.80),在≥65 岁的患者中为 0.66(0.57,0.76)。在≥70 岁的患者中,OS 的 HR 为 0.67(0.55.0.82),在≥75 岁的患者中,HR 为 0.81(0.58,1.13)。接受 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体治疗的患者与接受多西他赛治疗的患者相比,中位 OS 估计值分别为:<65 岁的患者为 14.5 个月,8.8 个月;≥65 岁的患者为 14.2 个月,9 个月;≥70 岁的患者为 14.1 个月,9.2 个月;≥75 岁的患者为 14.7 个月,9.5 个月。PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体治疗的患者发生 3 级或 4 级治疗相关不良事件的频率低于≥75 岁的患者(23%),高于>65 岁的患者(49%)和<65 岁的患者(47%),严重不良事件(30%、32.5%、15%)的发生率也较低;然而,在≤65 岁、>65 岁和>75 岁的患者中,治疗相关的不良事件导致停药的发生率相似(分别为 7%、7%和 5%)。

结论

65 岁及以上的晚期和转移性 NSCLC 患者,包括 75 岁及以上的患者,似乎从 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体治疗中获得了相似的生存获益。与<65 岁的患者相比,入组这些试验的≥75 岁的患者似乎能耐受 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体,且发生 3 级或 4 级治疗相关不良事件的发生率较低。

相似文献

1
FDA analyses of survival in older adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies.FDA 对 PD-1/PD-L1 阻断抗体临床试验中转移性非小细胞肺癌老年患者生存情况的分析。
Semin Oncol. 2018 Aug;45(4):220-225. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
FDA Approval Summary: Nivolumab for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Progression On or After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.美国食品药品监督管理局批准摘要:纳武单抗用于治疗在铂类化疗期间或之后病情进展的转移性非小细胞肺癌。
Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):634-42. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0507. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in elderly patients with PD-L1-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Pooled analysis from the KEYNOTE-010, KEYNOTE-024, and KEYNOTE-042 studies.帕博利珠单抗单药治疗 PD-L1 阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌老年患者的安全性和有效性:来自 KEYNOTE-010、KEYNOTE-024 和 KEYNOTE-042 研究的汇总分析。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Sep;135:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 May;10(5):1176-1181. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13060. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies after discontinuation due to adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer patients (HANSHIN 0316).抗 PD-1/PD-L1 抗体在非小细胞肺癌患者因不良事件停药后的疗效(HANSHIN 0316)。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4819-2.
6
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer without tumor PD-L1 expression: A pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对比单纯化疗用于无肿瘤 PD-L1 表达的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者:3 项随机对照研究的汇总分析。
Cancer. 2020 Nov 15;126(22):4867-4877. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33142. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 PD-1/PD-L1 联合疗法在晚期 NSCLC 一线治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2488-2502. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03442-3. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus platinum-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与铂类化疗用于晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Oct;160:105194. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105194. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Second- and Subsequent-line Treatments for Metastatic NSCLC: A Fractional Polynomials Network Meta-analysis of Cancer Immunotherapies.比较转移性非小细胞肺癌二线及后续治疗的疗效:癌症免疫疗法的分数多项式网络荟萃分析。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 Nov;20(6):451-460.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Which is the optimal immunotherapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in combination with chemotherapy: anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1?在联合化疗的情况下,哪种免疫疗法是晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌的最佳选择:抗 PD-1 还是抗 PD-L1?
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Dec 3;6(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0427-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of age-related survival differences in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients based on real-world data.基于真实世界数据的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者年龄相关生存差异分析。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1244. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14687-8.
2
Exosome, an important transmitter in the drug resistance of non-small cell lung cancer.外泌体,非小细胞肺癌耐药性中的一种重要传递者。
Front Oncol. 2025 May 15;15:1539047. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1539047. eCollection 2025.
3
Toxicity of Cancer Immunotherapies in Older Patients: Does Age Make a Difference?
癌症免疫疗法在老年患者中的毒性:年龄有影响吗?
Drugs Aging. 2024 Oct;41(10):787-794. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01149-2. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
4
Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy for Older Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Not Candidates for or Decline Surgery and Chemotherapy: A Practical Proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group.国际老年放疗组针对不适合或拒绝手术及化疗的局部晚期非转移性非小细胞肺癌老年患者的免疫治疗与放疗:一项实用建议
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 9;16(17):3112. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173112.
5
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of older people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.免疫检查点抑制剂联合铂类化疗对比铂类化疗联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗用于治疗老年人晚期非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 13;8(8):CD015495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015495.
6
Optimization of treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗策略的优化
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 16;14:1384906. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1384906. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring the Complexity and Promise of Tumor Immunotherapy in Drug Development.探索肿瘤免疫疗法在药物研发中的复杂性和前景。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 11;25(12):6444. doi: 10.3390/ijms25126444.
8
A Review of Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.免疫疗法在非小细胞肺癌中的研究进展
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 17;31(6):3495-3512. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31060258.
9
Effectiveness and safety of afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib for treatment-naïve elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multi-institute retrospective study.阿法替尼、吉非替尼和厄洛替尼用于初治的表皮生长因子受体突变的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的有效性和安全性:一项多机构回顾性研究。
Aging (Albany NY). 2024 Jan 8;16(1):550-567. doi: 10.18632/aging.205395.
10
Hematologic and lymphatic system toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a real-world study.免疫检查点抑制剂相关的血液学和淋巴系统毒性:一项真实世界研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1213608. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1213608. eCollection 2023.