University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA.
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 Nov;20(6):451-460.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
Extended onset of treatment effect and longer-term survival with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapies, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, have changed the landscape of second- or subsequent-line (2L+) treatments for adults with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic literature review included phase I to IV randomized, controlled trials of 2L+ NSCLC therapies from MEDLINE, Embase, and secondary sources.
Studies of treatments approved in the European Union or United States had to be in English with ≥ 10 patients per arm. A fractional polynomials network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted because traditional NMA of hazard ratios does not account for delayed onset of clinical effect or long-term survival observed in PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor trials. Adjusted analyses accounted for treatment switching in the atezolizumab OAK trial. Expected survival time reflected area under the curve over the time horizon. Expected overall survival (OS) was ranked by median ranking with 95% credible intervals and by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Of 25,115 screened records, 28 studies were included in the quantitative analyses of OS and progression-free survival.
PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had comparable expected 5-year OS; all performed better than other treatment options. In unadjusted analyses, surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranked nivolumab first (87.9%), followed by atezolizumab (85.8%) and pembrolizumab (82.8%). Analyses adjusted for patients switching from docetaxel to immunotherapy ranked atezolizumab first (89.6%), followed by nivolumab (86.5%) and pembrolizumab (81.9%).
This NMA applied an appropriate approach for indirect comparisons, including cancer immunotherapies, and supported robustness of PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapies for 2L+ treatment of NSCLC.
抗程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)/程序性死亡蛋白 1(PD-1)免疫疗法(阿替利珠单抗、纳武利尤单抗和帕博利珠单抗)的治疗效果起始时间延长和长期生存获益改变了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)成人二线或后线(2L+)治疗的格局。本系统文献综述纳入了来自 MEDLINE、Embase 和辅助来源的 I 期至 IV 期随机对照 2L+NSCLC 治疗试验。
研究药物必须为在欧盟或美国获批的治疗药物,且为英文,每组至少有 10 名患者。由于 PD-L1/PD-1 抑制剂试验中观察到的临床效果延迟和长期生存,传统的危险比网络荟萃分析(NMA)并不适用,因此进行了分数多项式 NMA。调整分析考虑了阿替利珠单抗 OAK 试验中的治疗转换。预期生存时间反映了时间范围内的曲线下面积。通过中位数排名和累积排序曲线下面积的 95%可信区间进行排名,中位秩和曲线下面积的排序来评估总生存期(OS)。在 25115 篇筛选记录中,28 项研究被纳入 OS 和无进展生存期的定量分析。
PD-L1/PD-1 抑制剂的预期 5 年 OS 相当;所有药物的表现均优于其他治疗选择。在未调整分析中,累积排序曲线下面积将纳武利尤单抗排在首位(87.9%),其次是阿替利珠单抗(85.8%)和帕博利珠单抗(82.8%)。调整了从多西他赛转为免疫治疗的患者后,阿替利珠单抗排名第一(89.6%),其次是纳武利尤单抗(86.5%)和帕博利珠单抗(81.9%)。
本 NMA 采用了适当的方法进行间接比较,包括癌症免疫疗法,并支持 PD-L1/PD-1 免疫疗法在 NSCLC 二线治疗中的稳健性。