Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatrics and Environmental Health, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Oct;126(10):107001. doi: 10.1289/EHP3546.
Fluoride exposures have not been established for pregnant women who live in regions with and without community water fluoridation.
Our aim was to measure urinary fluoride levels during pregnancy. We also assessed the contribution of drinking-water and tea consumption habits to maternal urinary fluoride (MUF) concentrations and evaluated the impact of various dilution correction standards, including adjustment for urinary creatinine and specific gravity (SG).
We measured MUF concentrations in spot samples collected in each trimester of pregnancy from 1,566 pregnant women in the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals cohort. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to assess variability in MUF concentrations across pregnancy. We used regression analyses to estimate associations between MUF levels, tea consumption, and water fluoride concentrations as measured by water treatment plants.
Creatinine-adjusted MUF values ([Formula: see text]; milligrams per liter) were almost two times higher for pregnant women living in fluoridated regions ([Formula: see text]) compared with nonfluoridated regions ([Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]). MUF values tended to increase over the course of pregnancy using both unadjusted values and adjusted values. Reproducibility of the unadjusted and adjusted MUF values was modest ([Formula: see text]). The municipal water fluoride level was positively associated with creatinine-adjusted MUF ([Formula: see text], 95% CI: 0.46, 0.57), accounting for 24% of the variance after controlling for covariates. Higher MUF concentrations correlated with numbers of cups of black ([Formula: see text] but not green tea ([Formula: see text]). Urinary creatinine and SG correction methods were highly correlated ([Formula: see text]) and were interchangeable in models examining predictors of MUF.
Community water fluoridation is a major source of fluoride exposure for pregnant women living in Canada. Urinary dilution correction with creatinine and SG were shown to be interchangeable for our sample of pregnant women. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3546.
对于生活在有和没有社区水氟化地区的孕妇,其氟化物暴露情况尚未确定。
我们旨在测量孕妇怀孕期间的尿液氟化物水平。我们还评估了饮用水和茶的消费习惯对母体尿氟化物(MUF)浓度的贡献,并评估了各种稀释校正标准的影响,包括调整尿肌酐和比重(SG)。
我们测量了来自环境化学物质母婴研究队列的 1566 名孕妇在妊娠各期的随机尿液样本中的 MUF 浓度。我们计算了组内相关系数(ICC)以评估 MUF 浓度在整个妊娠期间的变异性。我们使用回归分析来估计 MUF 水平,茶的消费以及由水处理厂测量的水氟化物浓度之间的关联。
用肌酐校正后的 MUF 值([公式:见文本];毫克/升)对于生活在氟化区的孕妇([公式:见文本])几乎是未氟化区的两倍([公式:见文本];[公式:见文本])。使用未调整值和调整值,MUF 值在整个妊娠期间均呈上升趋势。未调整和调整后的 MUF 值的重现性中等([公式:见文本])。市政水氟化物水平与肌酐校正后的 MUF 呈正相关([公式:见文本],95%置信区间:0.46,0.57),在控制了协变量后,可解释 24%的方差。较高的 MUF 浓度与黑茶叶的杯数相关([公式:见文本],但与绿茶无关([公式:见文本])。尿肌酐和 SG 校正方法高度相关([公式:见文本]),并且在检查 MUF 预测因素的模型中可以互换。
社区水氟化是生活在加拿大的孕妇氟化物暴露的主要来源。对于我们的孕妇样本,用肌酐和 SG 进行尿液稀释校正可以互换。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3546.