Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Head of Division I 1.3, Competent National Authority for the Nagoya Protocol. Konstantinstr. 110, Bonn 53179, Germany.
Phytomedicine. 2019 Feb;53:313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.10.020. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
In 2014 the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization entered into force. The Protocol aims to further concretize and improve the implementation of the access and benefit-sharing (ABS) obligations already foreseen under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) since 1993. The European Union has accepted the challenge to establish the necessary monitoring and compliance measures which are envisaged in the Nagoya Protocol. For this two ABS Regulations (Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1866) were adopted in the European Union.
However, the EU ABS legislation "only" provides a framework of instruments which now need to be tried out and tested in real life.
As this paper shows competent national authorities in the European Union, such as the one in Germany, currently face a number of practical challenges ranging from ABS awareness raising in numerous and very diverse sectors, to clarification of the highly disputed scope of the EU ABS legislation, to the development of effective, proportionate and dissuasive compliance checks.
The paper concludes that the implementation of ABS in general and the Nagoya Protocol in particular remain a highly complicated task influenced by rapid technological developments and a general lack of trust between countries as well as stakeholders.
2014 年,《名古屋议定书》生效,该议定书旨在进一步具体落实和完善《生物多样性公约》(CBD)自 1993 年以来就已预见的获取和惠益分享(ABS)义务。欧盟接受了建立《名古屋议定书》所设想的必要监测和合规措施的挑战。为此,欧盟通过了两项 ABS 法规(欧盟第 511/2014 号条例和实施条例(EU)2015/1866)。
然而,欧盟 ABS 立法“仅仅”提供了一个框架性的工具,现在需要在现实生活中进行尝试和测试。
正如本文所示,欧盟的主管国家机构,如德国,目前面临着许多实际挑战,从 ABS 在众多和非常多样化的部门中的意识提高,到对欧盟 ABS 立法的高度争议范围的澄清,再到制定有效、适度和威慑性的合规检查。
本文得出结论,ABS 的实施,特别是《名古屋议定书》的实施,仍然是一项高度复杂的任务,受到快速技术发展和国家以及利益相关者之间普遍缺乏信任的影响。