Suppr超能文献

适度和绝对自然语言的语言标记。

Linguistic markers of moderate and absolute natural language.

作者信息

Al-Mosaiwi Mohammed, Johnstone Tom

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Psychology and Clinical Languages, University of Reading, UK.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2018 Nov 1;134:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.004.

Abstract

In social, personality and mental health research, the tendency to select absolute end-points on Likert scales has been linked to certain cultures, lower intelligence, lower income and personality/mental health disorders. It is unclear whether this response style reflects an absolutist cognitive style or is merely an experimental artefact. In this study, we introduce an alternative, more informative, flexible and ecologically valid approach for estimating absolute responding, that uses natural language markers. We focussed on 'function words' (e.g. particles, conjunctions, prepositions) as they are more generalizable because they do not depend on any specific context. To identify such linguistic markers and test their generalizability, we conducted a text analysis of online reviews for films, tourist attractions and consumer products. All written reviews were accompanied by a rating scale (akin to Likert scale), which allowed us to label text samples as absolute/moderate. The data was split into independent 'training' and 'test' sets. Using the training set we identified a rank order of linguistic markers for absolute and moderate text, which were evaluated in a classifier on the test set. The top three markers alone ("but", "!" and "seem") produced 88% classification accuracy, which increased to 91% using 31 linguistic markers.

摘要

在社会、人格和心理健康研究中,在李克特量表上选择绝对端点的倾向与某些文化、较低的智力、较低的收入以及人格/心理健康障碍有关。目前尚不清楚这种反应方式是反映了一种绝对主义的认知风格,还是仅仅是一种实验假象。在本研究中,我们引入了一种替代方法,该方法更具信息量、灵活性和生态效度,用于估计绝对反应,它使用自然语言标记。我们关注“功能词”(如小品词、连词、介词),因为它们更具通用性,因为它们不依赖于任何特定语境。为了识别此类语言标记并测试其通用性,我们对电影、旅游景点和消费品的在线评论进行了文本分析。所有书面评论都附有一个评分量表(类似于李克特量表),这使我们能够将文本样本标记为绝对/适度。数据被分为独立的“训练”和“测试”集。我们使用训练集确定了绝对文本和适度文本的语言标记的排名顺序,并在测试集的分类器中对其进行评估。仅前三个标记(“but”、“!”和“seem”)的分类准确率就达到了88%,使用31个语言标记时,准确率提高到了91%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90bd/6085512/f3079ddb7669/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Linguistic markers of moderate and absolute natural language.
Pers Individ Dif. 2018 Nov 1;134:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.004.
2
In an Absolute State: Elevated Use of Absolutist Words Is a Marker Specific to Anxiety, Depression, and Suicidal Ideation.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;6(4):529-542. doi: 10.1177/2167702617747074. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:547-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
5
Linguistic features and psychological states: A machine-learning based approach.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:955850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955850. eCollection 2022.
7
When BERT meets Bilbo: a learning curve analysis of pretrained language model on disease classification.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 5;21(Suppl 9):377. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01829-2.
9
Hearing Aid Consumer Reviews: A Linguistic Analysis in Relation to Benefit and Satisfaction Ratings.
Am J Audiol. 2021 Sep 10;30(3):761-768. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00061. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Personality and Psychological Distress Using Natural Language Processing: A Study Protocol.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:865541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865541. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
In an Absolute State: Elevated Use of Absolutist Words Is a Marker Specific to Anxiety, Depression, and Suicidal Ideation.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;6(4):529-542. doi: 10.1177/2167702617747074. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
2
When small words foretell academic success: the case of college admissions essays.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115844. eCollection 2014.
3
Extreme response style and symptom return after depression treatment: the role of positive extreme responding.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Jun;82(3):500-9. doi: 10.1037/a0035755. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
4
Minor and major depression in the general population: does dysfunctional thinking play a role?
Compr Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;51(3):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.08.006.
5
An investigation of extreme responding as a mediator of cognitive therapy for depression.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Apr;48(4):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.007. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
6
Personality predictors of extreme response style.
J Pers. 2009 Feb;77(1):261-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00545.x. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
8
How does cognitive therapy prevent relapse in residual depression? Evidence from a controlled trial.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;69(3):347-57. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.3.347.
9
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1296-312. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296.
10
Relationship of age, sex, and intelligence level to extreme response style.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1965 Dec;2(6):907-9. doi: 10.1037/h0022746.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验