Wideman Cassidy E, Jardine Kristen H, Winters Boyer D
Department of Psychology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychology and Collaborative Neuroscience Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Dec;156:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
When consolidated long-term memories are reactivated they can destabilize, rendering the memory labile and vulnerable to modification. This period of lability is followed by reconsolidation, a process that restabilizes the memory trace. Reactivation-induced memory destabilization is the gateway process to reconsolidation, but research in this area has focused primarily on the mechanisms underlying post-reactivation restabilization. As a result, our understanding of processes subserving destabilization have lagged behind those responsible for reconsolidation. Here we review the literature investigating the neural basis of reactivation-induced memory destabilization. We begin by reviewing memory destabilization broadly and the boundary conditions that influence the likelihood of reactivated memories to destabilize. We then discuss the fact that boundary conditions can be overcome in the presence of novelty, providing evidence for the theory that reconsolidation is a mechanism for memory updating. From here, we delve into a detailed review of the role of classical neurotransmitter systems, including dopamine, serotonin, noradrenaline, glutamate, GABA and acetylcholine, in reconsolidation, with a focus on their involvement in destabilization. Many of these neurotransmitters appear capable of promoting memory destabilization, and research investigating the cellular pathways through which they influence destabilization is a growing area. However, gaps remain in our understanding of how these neurotransmitters work in conjunction with one another to support destabilization across different types of memory and in different brain regions. Advances in the coming years within this research field should greatly contribute to our understanding of the neural mechanisms that influence the dynamic process of long-term memory storage and modification, information crucial to the development of potential treatments for disorders characterized by strong, maladaptive memories.
当巩固的长期记忆被重新激活时,它们可能会变得不稳定,使记忆变得易变且容易被修改。这种不稳定期之后是重新巩固,这是一个使记忆痕迹重新稳定的过程。重新激活诱导的记忆不稳定是重新巩固的关键过程,但该领域的研究主要集中在重新激活后重新稳定的潜在机制上。因此,我们对不稳定过程的理解落后于对重新巩固负责的过程的理解。在这里,我们回顾了研究重新激活诱导的记忆不稳定的神经基础的文献。我们首先广泛回顾记忆不稳定以及影响重新激活的记忆不稳定可能性的边界条件。然后我们讨论在有新异性的情况下边界条件可以被克服这一事实,为重新巩固是记忆更新机制的理论提供证据。从这里开始,我们深入详细回顾经典神经递质系统,包括多巴胺、血清素、去甲肾上腺素、谷氨酸、γ-氨基丁酸和乙酰胆碱在重新巩固中的作用,重点是它们在不稳定中的参与。许多这些神经递质似乎能够促进记忆不稳定,研究它们影响不稳定的细胞途径是一个不断发展的领域。然而,我们对这些神经递质如何相互配合以支持不同类型记忆和不同脑区的不稳定的理解仍然存在差距。未来几年该研究领域的进展应该会极大地有助于我们理解影响长期记忆存储和修改动态过程的神经机制,这一信息对于开发针对以强烈的、适应不良记忆为特征的疾病的潜在治疗方法至关重要。