• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从原研药到生物类似药依那西普的强制性非医学转换是否会导致炎症性关节炎患者的医疗保健使用和成本增加?一项丹麦基于登记的研究。

Does a mandatory non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept lead to increase in healthcare use and costs? A Danish register-based study of patients with inflammatory arthritis.

机构信息

DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2019 Aug 12;5(2):e001016. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001016. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001016
PMID:31452931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6691512/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In year 2016, Danish national guidelines included a mandatory switch of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated with originator etanercept (ETA) to biosimilar SB4 in routine care. We aimed to explore if switching lead to increased healthcare utilisation and costs.

METHODS

Observational cohort study. Adult patients who switched from ETA to SB4 were identified in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. In the National Patient Registry, we identified health utilisation (hospital admissions/hospital days/outpatient visits/prescription medication use) and comorbidities. Estimation of health utilisation included average use and costs 1 year before/after switch, changes after the switch, and whether patient characteristics affected changes. Analyses were by adjusted two-step gamma distributed regression models, and for changes over time a generalized estimation equations (GEE) model was applied. Impact of comorbidities was explored as interaction terms in the model. Medication costs of ETA and SB4 were not included in model.

RESULTS

1620 patients were included (mean age 55 years (SD 14.7), 40% male). Costs before and after switching were mainly driven by outpatient visits (67%/72% of all costs). Monthly fluctuations of costs were similar before/after switch. After switching, use (8%) and costs (7%) of outpatient services increased, whereas costs of admissions (55%) and medication (5%) decreased. Patients with longer ETA treatment duration had an increase in use and costs of healthcare resources, whereas gender and comorbidities had no impact. Higher age was associated with an increase in costs of inpatient services.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated no obvious changes in overall use and costs of healthcare services following switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept.

摘要

目的

2016 年,丹麦国家指南要求将接受依那西普(ETA)治疗的炎症性风湿病患者强制性转换为常规治疗中的生物类似药 SB4。我们旨在探讨转换是否会导致医疗保健利用和成本增加。

方法

观察性队列研究。在丹麦全国性的 DANBIO 登记处中,确定了从 ETA 转换为 SB4 的成年患者。在国家患者登记处,我们确定了卫生利用(住院入院/住院天数/门诊就诊/处方药物使用)和合并症。健康利用的估计包括转换前后 1 年的平均使用和成本,转换后的变化,以及患者特征是否影响变化。分析采用调整后的两步伽马分布回归模型,对于随时间的变化采用广义估计方程(GEE)模型。在模型中,探索了合并症的影响作为交互项。ETA 和 SB4 的药物成本未包含在模型中。

结果

共纳入 1620 例患者(平均年龄 55 岁[SD 14.7],40%为男性)。转换前后的成本主要由门诊就诊(所有成本的 67%/72%)驱动。转换前后的每月成本波动相似。转换后,门诊服务的使用(8%)和成本(7%)增加,而入院(55%)和药物(5%)的成本减少。ETA 治疗持续时间较长的患者,医疗资源的使用和成本增加,而性别和合并症无影响。较高的年龄与住院服务成本的增加相关。

结论

我们发现在从原研药转换为生物类似药依那西普后,整体医疗保健服务的使用和成本没有明显变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edf8/6691512/1f4eec27ddc7/rmdopen-2019-001016f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edf8/6691512/1f4eec27ddc7/rmdopen-2019-001016f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edf8/6691512/1f4eec27ddc7/rmdopen-2019-001016f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Does a mandatory non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept lead to increase in healthcare use and costs? A Danish register-based study of patients with inflammatory arthritis.从原研药到生物类似药依那西普的强制性非医学转换是否会导致炎症性关节炎患者的医疗保健使用和成本增加?一项丹麦基于登记的研究。
RMD Open. 2019 Aug 12;5(2):e001016. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001016. eCollection 2019.
2
To switch or not to switch: results of a nationwide guideline of mandatory switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept. One-year treatment outcomes in 2061 patients with inflammatory arthritis from the DANBIO registry.是否切换:全国强制性从原研药切换至生物类似药依那西普的指南结果。DANBIO 登记处 2061 例炎性关节炎患者的 1 年治疗结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):192-200. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213474. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Costs associated with non-medical switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK.英国类风湿关节炎患者从原研药转换为生物类似药依那西普的非医学相关费用。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1162-1170. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1652183. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Acceptance rate and sociological factors involved in the switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept (SB4).从原研药到生物类似药依那西普(SB4)转换过程中的接受率和社会学因素。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr;48(5):927-932. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry.一项针对 802 例炎症性关节炎患者的全国性非医学性从原研英夫利昔单抗转换为生物类似药 CT-P13 的研究:DANBIO 注册研究的 1 年临床结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Aug;76(8):1426-1431. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210742. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Open-Label, Non-Mandatory Transitioning From Originator Etanercept to Biosimilar SB4: Six-Month Results From a Controlled Cohort Study.开放性、非强制性由依那西普原研药转换为生物类似药 SB4:一项对照队列研究的 6 个月结果。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;70(9):1408-1418. doi: 10.1002/art.40516. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Comparative effectiveness of two adalimumab biosimilars in 1318 real-world patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease mandated to switch from originator adalimumab: nationwide observational study emulating a randomised clinical trial.两种阿达木单抗生物类似药在 1318 名需要从原研阿达木单抗转换的炎症性风湿病患者中的比较效果:全国性观察性研究模拟随机临床试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov;80(11):1400-1409. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-219951. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Doctor's aptitude for switching from innovator etanercept to biosimilar etanercept in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: experience from a single French rheumatology tertiary care center.医生在炎症性风湿病中从创新型依那西普转换为生物类似药依那西普的能力:来自法国单一风湿病三级护理中心的经验。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;77(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02957-2. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
9
Infliximab biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: clinical outcomes in real-world patients from the DANBIO registry.英夫利昔单抗生物类似药-生物类似药转换治疗炎症性风湿病患者:DANBIO 注册研究中真实世界患者的临床结局。
RMD Open. 2022 Nov;8(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002560.
10
Outcomes following switching from etanercept originator to etanercept biosimilar in 1024 patients with RA: a matched-analysis of the BSRBR-RA.1024例类风湿关节炎患者从原研依那西普转换为依那西普生物类似药后的结局:英国风湿病学会生物制剂注册登记处类风湿关节炎匹配分析
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Aug 1;63(8):2082-2092. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead470.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of biosimilar use on healthcare utilization among new users of etanercept for inflammatory arthritis: a population-based regression discontinuity analysis.生物类似药使用对炎症性关节炎新使用依那西普患者医疗保健利用的影响:基于人群的断点回归分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Apr 11;45:101058. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101058. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Fostering healthcare system sustainability through efficient practices: Can adopting biosimilars ease the financial burden of rheumatoid arthritis?通过高效实践促进医疗保健系统的可持续性:采用生物类似药能否减轻类风湿性关节炎的经济负担?
F1000Res. 2025 Apr 4;13:1128. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.156983.2. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical trial and 'real-world' data support switching from a bio-originator to its biosimilar.临床试验和“真实世界”数据支持从生物原研药转换为其生物类似药。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Apr;79(4):e44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214994. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
'To switch or not to switch': the missing piece in the puzzle of biosimilar literature?“换还是不换”:生物类似药文献拼图中缺失的一块?
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Apr;79(4):e36. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214908. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
Mandatory, cost-driven switching from originator etanercept to its biosimilar SB4: possible fallout on non-medical switching.
Counting the costs: a nationwide study on healthcare use following an adalimumab biosimilar switch in >1300 inflammatory arthritis patients.
成本核算:一项针对1300多名炎性关节炎患者改用阿达木单抗生物类似药后的医疗保健使用情况的全国性研究。
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Oct 16;16:1759720X241289391. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241289391. eCollection 2024.
4
Real-World Evidence of Clinical Outcomes of the Use of the Adalimumab Biosimilar SB5 in Rheumatic and Gastrointestinal Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: 12-Month Data from the PERFUSE Study.阿达木单抗生物类似药SB5用于风湿性和胃肠道免疫介导的炎症性疾病的临床结局的真实世界证据:来自PERFUSE研究的12个月数据。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Dec;11(4):573-591. doi: 10.1007/s40801-024-00459-6. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
5
Policy measures and instruments used in European countries to increase biosimilar uptake: a systematic review.政策措施和工具在欧洲国家使用增加生物类似药的吸收: 一个系统的回顾。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;12:1263472. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1263472. eCollection 2024.
6
Outcome of adult patients with JIA treated with the biosimilar Benepali: results of the biologic register JuMBO.生物类似药 Benepali 治疗的成人类风湿关节炎患者的结局:生物制剂注册登记 JuMBO 的结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Dec 13;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02968-7.
7
Mapping Outcomes and Registries Used in Current Danish Pharmacoepidemiological Research.丹麦当前药物流行病学研究中使用的结果映射与登记系统
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 26;14:521-542. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S341480. eCollection 2022.
8
Adalimumab and ABP 501 in the Treatment of a Large Cohort of Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Real Life Retrospective Analysis.阿达木单抗和ABP 501治疗大量炎性关节炎患者:一项真实生活回顾性分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 23;12(3):335. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030335.
9
Mandatory nonmedical switching from originator to biosimilar infliximab in patients with inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis in British Columbia: a cohort study.不列颠哥伦比亚省炎性关节炎和银屑病患者中,英夫利昔单抗由原研药转为生物类似药的强制性非医学转换:一项队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;10(1):E109-E118. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200319. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
10
Rapid monitoring of health services use following a policy to switch patients from originator to biosimilar etanercept-a cohort study in British Columbia.在一项将患者从原研药转换为生物类似药依那西普的政策实施后,对医疗服务使用情况进行快速监测——不列颠哥伦比亚省的一项队列研究
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 27;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41927-021-00235-x.
强制的、成本驱动的从原研药依那西普转换为其生物类似药SB4:对非医学转换可能产生的影响。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):e13. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214757. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
To switch or not to switch: results of a nationwide guideline of mandatory switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept. One-year treatment outcomes in 2061 patients with inflammatory arthritis from the DANBIO registry.是否切换:全国强制性从原研药切换至生物类似药依那西普的指南结果。DANBIO 登记处 2061 例炎性关节炎患者的 1 年治疗结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):192-200. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213474. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Non-pharmacological Effects in Switching Medication: The Nocebo Effect in Switching from Originator to Biosimilar Agent.转换药物时的非药物效应:从原创药到生物类似药转换时的反安慰剂效应。
BioDrugs. 2018 Oct;32(5):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0306-1.
6
The Biosimilar Nocebo Effect? A Systematic Review of Double-Blinded Versus Open-Label Studies.《生物类似药的反安慰剂效应?双盲与开放标签研究的系统评价》
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Oct;24(10):952-959. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.10.952.
7
Acceptance rate and sociological factors involved in the switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept (SB4).从原研药到生物类似药依那西普(SB4)转换过程中的接受率和社会学因素。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr;48(5):927-932. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Does a mandatory non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar infliximab lead to increased use of outpatient healthcare resources? A register-based study in patients with inflammatory arthritis.从原研英夫利昔单抗强制转换为生物类似药的非医疗行为是否会导致门诊医疗资源使用增加?一项针对炎性关节炎患者的基于登记的研究。
RMD Open. 2018 Jul 11;4(2):e000710. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000710. eCollection 2018.
9
Editorial: The American College of Rheumatology White Paper on Biosimilars: It Isn't All White-There Is Some Gray and Black.社论:美国风湿病学会关于生物类似药的白皮书:并非全是白色——也有一些灰色和黑色地带。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;70(3):323-325. doi: 10.1002/art.40402. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
10
Switching from the bio-originators to biosimilar: is it premature to recommend this procedure?从生物原研药转换为生物类似药:推荐此做法是否为时过早?
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Apr;78(4):e23. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212820. Epub 2017 Dec 29.