Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗治疗慢性炎症性风湿性疾病患者:一项常规护理中患者层面治疗轨迹的研究。

Treatment with adalimumab in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in routine care.

作者信息

Redeker Imke, Moustakis Stefan, Tsiami Styliani, Baraliakos Xenofon, Andreica Ioana, Buehring Bjoern, Braun Jürgen, Kiltz Uta

机构信息

Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.

Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Krankenhaus St. Josef, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023 Sep 8;15:1759720X231197087. doi: 10.1177/1759720X231197087. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous experiences with non-medical switching of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) come mainly from phase III extension of randomised clinical trials and little from routine care.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse treatment trajectories over 2 years in patients with CIRD conducting a non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar ADA.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted with data from a third-level rheumatology centre in Germany. CIRD patients on originator ADA who switched to ADA biosimilar from October 2018 onwards were identified and followed until September 2020.

METHODS

Patients' characteristics were compared between the four defined treatment trajectories 'continued biosimilar ADA therapy', 'back-switch to originator ADA therapy', 'switch to another biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy' and 'stopped bDMARD therapy/death/drop out'. Factors associated with continuing biosimilar ADA therapy were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 121 CIRD patients were included. Most patients (66.9%) continued therapy with biosimilar ADA over 2 years, with a treatment retention rate of 73.1%. Whereas 21 patients (17.4%) switched back to originator ADA, mainly due to adverse events, and 8 patients (6.6%) switched to a different bDMARD, mainly due to lack of effect. The estimated risk of withdrawal was lower for longer prior duration on originator ADA [hazard ratio (HR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.97] and higher for higher C-reactive protein levels at baseline (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00-1.39). Male patients, older patients and those for whom originator ADA was their first bDMARD tended to have a lower risk of withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that three of four patients continue biosimilar ADA over 2 years with lower risks of withdrawal for male sex, older age, longer prior duration on originator ADA and originator ADA as first bDMARD.

摘要

背景

慢性炎症性风湿性疾病(CIRD)患者中阿达木单抗(ADA)非医学换药的既往经验主要来自随机临床试验的III期扩展研究,而来自常规治疗的经验较少。

目的

分析CIRD患者从原研ADA非医学换用生物类似药ADA后2年的治疗轨迹。

设计

利用德国一家三级风湿病中心的数据进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究。确定了2018年10月起从原研ADA换用生物类似药ADA的CIRD患者,并随访至2020年9月。

方法

比较了“继续使用生物类似药ADA治疗”、“换回原研ADA治疗”、“换用另一种生物性改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARD)治疗”和“停止bDMARD治疗/死亡/退出”这四种明确治疗轨迹的患者特征。使用Cox比例风险回归分析来分析与继续使用生物类似药ADA治疗相关的因素。

结果

共纳入121例CIRD患者。大多数患者(66.9%)在2年期间继续使用生物类似药ADA治疗,治疗保留率为73.1%。21例患者(17.4%)换回原研ADA,主要原因是不良事件;8例患者(6.6%)换用了另一种bDMARD,主要原因是疗效不佳。原研ADA使用时间越长,停药风险估计越低[风险比(HR):0.82;95%置信区间(CI):0.69 - 0.97];基线C反应蛋白水平越高,停药风险越高(HR:1.18;95%CI:1.00 - 1.39)。男性患者、老年患者以及原研ADA是其首个bDMARD的患者停药风险往往较低。

结论

我们的结果表明,四分之三的患者在2年期间继续使用生物类似药ADA,男性、年龄较大、原研ADA使用时间较长以及原研ADA是首个bDMARD的患者停药风险较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a257/10492472/670fa61b8191/10.1177_1759720X231197087-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验