• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善糖尿病患者的综合护理。

Improving comprehensive care for patients with diabetes.

作者信息

Kutz Tamar L, Roszhart Jameson M, Hale Marshall, Dolan Virginia, Suchomski Gerald, Jaeger Cassie

机构信息

Ambulatory Networks, Memorial Health System, Springfield, Illinois, USA.

Memorial Physician Services, Memorial Health System, Springfield, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 15;7(4):e000101. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000101. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000101
PMID:30397656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6202994/
Abstract

Patients with diabetes require access to systematic and ongoing care delivered by a team of healthcare providers. Despite national attention and well-accepted best practices, diabetic care, blood pressure and haemoglobin A1c (A1c) levels for patients with diabetes in our primary care setting were highly variable and below the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) 75th percentile benchmark. From January 2015 to January 2016, 22% of patients with diabetes in our primary care setting had both blood pressure and A1c levels controlled and 23% had their annual diabetic care bundle completed, which includes A1c and blood pressure measurements, foot examination and nephropathy attention. Lack of standardised care algorithms, electronic health record documentation and education was identified. Lean Six Sigma methodologies were used to re-engineer the care that patients with diabetes receive. Key improvement initiatives focused on standardisation of accepted care practices through electronic templates, education and re-evaluation of patients to make 90-day, rapid cycle changes. Interventions were piloted in one primary care clinic then expanded to eight additional clinics. At the pilot site, the per cent of patients who completed the diabetic care bundle increased from 33% to 71% and the per cent of patients with diabetes with both A1c and blood pressure controlled increased from 31% to 43% (two-proportion test, p<0.01) postintervention. On rollout to eight additional clinics, the per cent of patients who completed the diabetic care bundle increased from 23% to 67% and the per cent of patients with diabetes with both their A1c and their blood pressure controlled increased from 22% to 41% (two-proportion test, p<0.01). After the interventions, nephropathy attention, A1c and blood pressure metrics exceeded HEDIS 75th percentile. Standardisation of accepted care practices for patients with diabetes improved compliance with diabetic care bundle completion and patient outcomes in the primary care setting.

摘要

糖尿病患者需要获得由医疗保健服务团队提供的系统且持续的护理。尽管受到了全国关注且有公认的最佳实践,但在我们的初级保健机构中,糖尿病患者的糖尿病护理、血压和糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平差异很大,且低于医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)第75百分位数基准。2015年1月至2016年1月,在我们的初级保健机构中,22%的糖尿病患者的血压和A1c水平得到了控制,23%的患者完成了年度糖尿病护理套餐,该套餐包括A1c和血压测量、足部检查以及肾病关注。研究发现存在缺乏标准化护理算法、电子健康记录文档记录和教育的问题。采用精益六西格玛方法对糖尿病患者接受的护理进行了重新设计。关键的改进举措集中在通过电子模板、教育以及对患者进行重新评估来实现公认护理实践的标准化,以进行为期90天的快速循环改进。干预措施先在一家初级保健诊所进行试点,然后扩展到另外八家诊所。在试点地点,完成糖尿病护理套餐的患者百分比从33%增至71%,A1c和血压均得到控制的糖尿病患者百分比从31%增至43%(双比例检验,p<0.01),这是干预后的结果。在推广到另外八家诊所后,完成糖尿病护理套餐的患者百分比从23%增至67%,A1c和血压均得到控制的糖尿病患者百分比从22%增至41%(双比例检验,p<0.01)。干预措施实施后,肾病关注、A1c和血压指标超过了HEDIS第75百分位数。糖尿病患者公认护理实践的标准化提高了初级保健机构中糖尿病护理套餐完成率和患者治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b688/6202994/94ef28f9824e/bmjoq-2017-000101f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b688/6202994/ee5f0d58375d/bmjoq-2017-000101f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b688/6202994/94ef28f9824e/bmjoq-2017-000101f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b688/6202994/ee5f0d58375d/bmjoq-2017-000101f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b688/6202994/94ef28f9824e/bmjoq-2017-000101f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving comprehensive care for patients with diabetes.改善糖尿病患者的综合护理。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 15;7(4):e000101. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000101. eCollection 2018.
2
Pharmacist recommendations to improve the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial.药剂师关于改善糖尿病护理质量的建议:一项随机对照试验。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Mar;16(2):104-13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.2.104.
3
4
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Program in a Primary Care Setting Within an Integrated Health Care System.在综合性医疗保健系统中,评估初级保健环境下药师管理的糖尿病项目。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):114-122. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.114.
5
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
6
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
7
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
8
"Act on Threes" Paradigm for Treatment Intensification of Type 2 Diabetes in Managed Care: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study with an Educational Intervention Targeting Improved Glycemic Control.“三步曲”方案在强化管理型医疗中 2 型糖尿病治疗的作用:以改善血糖控制为目标的教育干预随机对照研究结果
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Sep;22(9):1028-38. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9.1028.
9
Evaluation of the Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Telehealth Clinic on Diabetes-Related Goals of Therapy in a Veteran Population.药师主导的远程医疗诊所对退伍军人人群糖尿病相关治疗目标影响的评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Mar;36(3):348-56. doi: 10.1002/phar.1719. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
10
Cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based multiple behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals to improve their management of type 2 diabetes in primary care.基于理论的多行为改变干预措施的群组随机对照试验,旨在改善初级保健中医护人员对 2 型糖尿病的管理。
Implement Sci. 2018 May 2;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0754-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A descriptive analysis of primary care providers' interest in clinical pharmacy services.基层医疗服务提供者对临床药学服务兴趣的描述性分析。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Apr 21;10:100267. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100267. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Factors Influencing the Desirability, Acceptability, and Adherence of Patients with Diabetes to Telemedicine.影响糖尿病患者对远程医疗的需求性、可接受性和依从性的因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 26;58(8):997. doi: 10.3390/medicina58080997.
3
Assessment of quality of care provided to adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus at public hospitals in Gamo Gofa zone, Southern Ethiopia: Facility based Cross-Sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Erratum. Glycemic Targets. Sec. 6. In . Diabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1);S48-S56.勘误。血糖目标。第6节。载于《糖尿病护理》2017年;40(增刊1);S48 - S56。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):985. doi: 10.2337/dc17-er07a. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Current State of Value-Based Purchasing Programs.基于价值的采购计划的现状
Circulation. 2016 May 31;133(22):2197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.010268.
3
The role of hemoglobin A1c in the assessment of diabetes and cardiovascular risk.糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病和心血管风险评估中的作用。
评估埃塞俄比亚南部 Gamo Gofa 地区公立医院 2 型糖尿病成人患者的护理质量:基于机构的横断面研究。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2022 Sep;5(5):e355. doi: 10.1002/edm2.355. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
4
Primary care service utilisation and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort analysis.2 型糖尿病的初级保健服务利用和结局:一项纵向队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e054654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054654.
5
Improving Diabetes Control Using Lean Six Sigma Quality Improvement in an Endocrine Clinic in a Large Accountable Care Organization.在一家大型责任医疗组织的内分泌诊所中,运用精益六西格玛质量改进方法改善糖尿病管理。
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Jan;39(1):57-63. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0048.
6
Diabetes management in Guinea Bissau: a situational analysis.几内亚比绍的糖尿病管理:现状分析
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Sep 4;34:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.10.19874. eCollection 2019.
7
The impact of an integrated diabetes and kidney service on patients, primary and specialist health professionals in Australia: A qualitative study.澳大利亚综合糖尿病和肾脏服务对患者、初级和专科卫生专业人员的影响:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 15;14(7):e0219685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219685. eCollection 2019.
Cleve Clin J Med. 2016 May;83(5 Suppl 1):S4-S10. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.83.s1.02.
4
The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review.重新设计护理流程对护理质量的影响:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 19;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0.
5
Primary care diabetes bundle management: 3-year outcomes for microvascular and macrovascular events.
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Jun 1;20(6):e175-82.
6
Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program.大规模高血压项目与血压控制改善相关。
JAMA. 2013 Aug 21;310(7):699-705. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.108769.
7
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.2012 年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1033-46. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2625. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review.美国初级保健环境中的慢性病管理模式与糖尿病管理:系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120180.
9
Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent and control diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.预防和控制糖尿病的干预措施的成本效益:系统评价。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1872-94. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0843.
10
The applicability of Lean and Six Sigma techniques to clinical and translational research.精益和六西格玛技术在临床和转化研究中的适用性。
J Investig Med. 2009 Oct;57(7):748-55. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181b91b3a.