• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯和英国医疗差错的诉讼程序。

The process of litigation for medical errors in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Alkhenizan Abdullah H, Shafiq Mohammed R

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Polyclinic, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2018 Nov;39(11):1075-1081. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.11.22854.

DOI:10.15537/smj.2018.11.22854
PMID:30397705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6274669/
Abstract

Efficient process of litigation of medical errors is a key to ensure fair, speedy, and accessible justice system. The conditions of establishing medical negligence are similar in both legal systems. These conditions include the duty of care, breach of that duty of care, the damages, and establishing causation. A culture of litigation and compensation is growing in the United Kingdom and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; however the cost of medical claims and awarded compensations are much more in the United Kingdom compared to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, there is a need for more transparency in the documentation and publication of litigated medical errors. In addition, there is a need to introduce interventions to shorten the duration of litigation in both legal systems. Financial caps on awarded compensation and caps on expert and legal fees are potential strategies to control the cost of medical errors which seems to work well in the Saudi model.

摘要

医疗差错诉讼的高效流程是确保司法系统公平、迅速且可及的关键。两种法律体系中认定医疗过失的条件相似。这些条件包括注意义务、违反该注意义务、损害以及因果关系的认定。英国和沙特阿拉伯王国的诉讼和赔偿文化都在不断发展;然而,与沙特阿拉伯王国相比,英国的医疗索赔成本和判给的赔偿要高得多。在沙特阿拉伯王国,医疗差错诉讼的文件记录和公布需要更高的透明度。此外,需要采取干预措施来缩短两个法律体系中的诉讼时长。对判给赔偿设置财务上限以及对专家费用和法律费用设置上限是控制医疗差错成本的潜在策略,这在沙特模式中似乎效果良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d0/6274669/0dc98b3f3b04/SaudiMedJ-39-1075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d0/6274669/0dc98b3f3b04/SaudiMedJ-39-1075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01d0/6274669/0dc98b3f3b04/SaudiMedJ-39-1075-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The process of litigation for medical errors in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom.沙特阿拉伯和英国医疗差错的诉讼程序。
Saudi Med J. 2018 Nov;39(11):1075-1081. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.11.22854.
2
Debunk the myths about the clinical negligence bill.揭穿关于临床疏忽法案的谣言。
Health Serv J. 2014 Jan 10;124(6381):18-9.
3
Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.医疗事故诉讼中的索赔、失误及赔偿金支付
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 11;354(19):2024-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054479.
4
Medical errors, medical negligence, and professional medical liability reform.医疗差错、医疗过失与专业医疗责任改革。
Public Health Rep. 2003 May-Jun;118(3):272-4. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.3.272.
5
Administrative compensation for medical injuries: lessons from three foreign systems.医疗损害的行政赔偿:来自三个外国制度的经验教训。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Jul;14:1-18.
6
Claims, liabilities, injures and compensation payments of medical malpractice litigation cases in China from 1998 to 2011.1998年至2011年中国医疗事故诉讼案件的索赔、责任、伤害及赔偿支付情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 13;14:390. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-390.
7
Malpractice liability, patient safety, and the personification of medical injury: opportunities for academic medicine.医疗事故责任、患者安全与医疗伤害的人格化:学术医学面临的机遇
Acad Med. 2006 Sep;81(9):823-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200609000-00011.
8
[Medical accountability: current elements].[医疗问责制:当前要素]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2014 Apr-May;198(4-5):689-700; discussion 700-1.
9
Medical negligence cases in Sangli District of Maharashtra.马哈拉施特拉邦桑利区的医疗疏忽案件。
Indian J Public Health. 2007 Jul-Sep;51(3):200.
10
Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.沙特阿拉伯的妇产科医疗事故索赔:发生率与原因
J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 May;40:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and Legal Aspects of Telerehabilitation in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯远程康复的伦理与法律问题
Int J Telerehabil. 2023 Dec 12;15(2):e6569. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2023.6569. eCollection 2023.
2
Hospital Work Conditions and the Mediation Role of Burnout: Residents and Practicing Physicians Reporting Adverse Events.医院工作条件与职业倦怠的中介作用:报告不良事件的住院医师和执业医师
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Jan 5;16:1-13. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S392523. eCollection 2023.
3
Dental malpractice lawsuit cases in Saudi Arabia: A national study.

本文引用的文献

1
Fault lines: resolving clinical negligence claims.
BMJ. 2013 Aug 12;347:f4996. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4996.
2
Malpractice litigation and the spine: the NHS perspective on 235 successful claims in England.医疗事故诉讼与脊柱:英格兰 235 例成功索赔案的英国国家医疗服务体系视角。
Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S196-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2203-5. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
3
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
沙特阿拉伯的牙科医疗事故诉讼案件:一项全国性研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Dec;34(8):763-771. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Awareness of medical law among health care practitioners in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医疗保健从业者对医疗法的认知。
Saudi Med J. 2022 Aug;43(8):954-958. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.8.20210920.
5
Emergency Medicine Physicians' Views on Providing Unnecessary Management in the Emergency Department.急诊医学医师对在急诊科提供不必要治疗的看法。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 26;14:183-193. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S341709. eCollection 2022.
6
The status of medical malpractice litigations in Saudi Arabia: Analysis of the annual report.沙特阿拉伯医疗事故诉讼的现状:年度报告分析
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;15(2):97-100. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_908_20. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Medical negligence in healthcare organizations and its impact on patient safety and public health: a bibliometric study.医疗机构中的医疗疏忽及其对患者安全和公共卫生的影响:文献计量学研究。
F1000Res. 2021 Mar 3;10:174. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.37448.1. eCollection 2021.
8
Correlation Between Malpractice Litigation and Legislation Reform in Taiwan Over a 30-Year Period.台湾30年间医疗纠纷诉讼与立法改革的相关性
Int J Gen Med. 2021 May 17;14:1889-1898. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S312640. eCollection 2021.
9
Litigation claims following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs.腹腔镜和开放式腹股沟疝修补术后的诉讼索赔。
Hernia. 2020 Oct;24(5):1113-1120. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02173-y. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
Does physician distraction lead to diagnostic and management errors? An exploratory study in the primary care setting.医生分心会导致诊断和管理失误吗?一项在基层医疗环境中的探索性研究。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2019 Nov 23;14(6):502-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.10.005. eCollection 2019 Dec.