Barasa Edwine, Rogo Khama, Mwaura Njeri, Chuma Jane
a Health Economics Research Unit , KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme , Nairobi , Kenya.
b Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK.
Health Syst Reform. 2018;4(4):346-361. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2018.1513267. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
This article identifies and describes the reforms undertaken by the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) and examines their implications for Kenya's quest to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). We undertook a review of published and grey literature to identify key reforms that had been implemented by the NHIF since 2010. We examined the reforms undertaken by the NHIF using a health financing evaluation framework that considers the feasibility, equity, efficiency, and sustainability of health financing mechanisms. We found the following NHIF reforms: (1) the introduction of the Civil Servants Scheme (CSS), (2) the introduction of a stepwise quality improvement system, (3) the health insurance subsidy for the poor (HISP), (4) revision of monthly contribution rates and expansion of the benefit package, and (5) the upward revision of provider reimbursement rates. Though there are improvements in several areas, these reforms raise equity, efficiency, feasibility, and sustainability concerns. The article concludes that though NHIF reforms in Kenya are well intentioned and there has been improvement in several areas, design attributes could compromise the extent to which they achieve their intended goal of providing universal financing risk protection to the Kenyan population.
本文识别并描述了国家医疗保险基金(NHIF)所进行的改革,并探讨了这些改革对肯尼亚实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)目标的影响。我们对已发表文献和灰色文献进行了综述,以识别自2010年以来NHIF实施的关键改革。我们使用一个卫生筹资评估框架来审视NHIF所进行的改革,该框架考虑了卫生筹资机制的可行性、公平性、效率和可持续性。我们发现了以下NHIF改革举措:(1)引入公务员计划(CSS),(2)引入逐步质量改进系统,(3)针对贫困人口的医疗保险补贴(HISP),(4)修订月缴费率并扩大福利包,以及(5)提高医疗机构报销率。尽管在几个领域有改进,但这些改革引发了对公平性、效率、可行性和可持续性的担忧。文章得出结论,尽管肯尼亚的NHIF改革出发点良好且在几个领域已有改善,但设计特性可能会影响其实现为肯尼亚民众提供全民筹资风险保护这一预期目标的程度。