• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解部分领先医院电子健康记录(EHR)的优化过程:一项定性研究。

Understanding optimization processes of electronic health records (EHR) in select leading hospitals: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Moon Mark Chun, Hills Rebecca, Demiris George

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center.

University of Washington.

出版信息

J Innov Health Inform. 2018 Jun 30;25(2):109-125. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v25i2.1011.

DOI:10.14236/jhi.v25i2.1011
PMID:30398450
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about optimization of electronic health records (EHR) systems in the hospital setting while adoption of EHR systems continues in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To understand optimization processes of EHR systems undertaken in leading healthcare organizations in the United States.

METHODS

Informed by grounded theory approach, a qualitative study was undertaken that involved 11 in-depth interviews and a focus group with the EHR experts from the high performing healthcare organizations across the United States.

RESULTS

The study describes EHR optimization processes characterized by prioritizing exponentially increasing requests with predominant focus on improving efficiency of EHR, building optimization teams or advisory groups, and standardization. The study discusses 16 types of optimization that interdependently produced 16 results along with identifying 11 barriers and 20 facilitators to optimization.

CONCLUSION

The study describes overall experiences of optimizing electronic health records in select high performing healthcare organizations in the US. The findings highlight the importance of optimizing the EHR after, and even before, go-live and dedicating resources exclusively for optimization.

摘要

背景

在美国,电子健康记录(EHR)系统的采用仍在持续,而医院环境中电子健康记录系统的优化情况却鲜为人知。

目的

了解美国领先医疗组织中电子健康记录系统的优化过程。

方法

采用扎根理论方法进行定性研究,对来自美国各地高绩效医疗组织的11名电子健康记录专家进行了深入访谈,并组织了一次焦点小组讨论。

结果

该研究描述了电子健康记录优化过程,其特点是优先处理呈指数级增长的请求,主要侧重于提高电子健康记录的效率、组建优化团队或咨询小组以及标准化。该研究讨论了16种相互依赖产生16种结果的优化类型,同时确定了11个优化障碍和20个优化促进因素。

结论

该研究描述了美国部分高绩效医疗组织中优化电子健康记录的总体经验。研究结果强调了在上线前甚至上线后优化电子健康记录以及专门投入资源进行优化的重要性。

相似文献

1
Understanding optimization processes of electronic health records (EHR) in select leading hospitals: a qualitative study.了解部分领先医院电子健康记录(EHR)的优化过程:一项定性研究。
J Innov Health Inform. 2018 Jun 30;25(2):109-125. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v25i2.1011.
2
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.安全使用电子健康记录和健康信息技术系统:信任但要验证。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2.
3
Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.门诊电子健康记录系统实施的循证管理:概念支持与定性证据评估
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England.我们痛苦,但我们更好了:在英国一家精神卫生医院实施电子健康记录系统的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 31;12:484. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-484.
5
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis.电子健康记录收件箱相关可用性的障碍、促进因素和改进建议的探索:定性分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912638. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12638.
6
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis.迈向成功协调基于电子健康记录的转诊:定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27;6:84. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-84.
7
CAH to CAH: EHR implementation advice to critical access hospitals from peer experts and other key informants.从同行专家和其他关键信息提供者处获取的针对基层医疗急救医院电子健康记录实施的建议:医院与医院之间的交流
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Feb 12;5(1):92-117. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-08-RA-0066. eCollection 2014.
8
Strategies for Primary Care Stakeholders to Improve Electronic Health Records (EHRs).基层医疗利益相关者改善电子健康记录(EHRs)的策略。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):126-34. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150212.
9
Adoption of electronic health records in Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals.韩国三级教学和综合医院采用电子健康记录。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Mar;81(3):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
10
User Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Electronic Health Records in Behavioral Hospitals: Qualitative Study.行为医院实施电子健康记录的障碍与促进因素的用户观点:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 8;5(4):e18764. doi: 10.2196/18764.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns and Perceptions of Standard Order Set Use Among Physicians Working Within a Multihospital System: Mixed Methods Study.多医院系统中医生使用标准医嘱集的模式和认知:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 8;8:e54022. doi: 10.2196/54022.
2
Understanding prescribing errors for system optimisation: the technology-related error mechanism classification.理解处方错误以进行系统优化:与技术相关的错误机制分类。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Nov 2;31(1):e100974. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100974.
3
Views and Uses of Sepsis Digital Alerts in National Health Service Trusts in England: Qualitative Study With Health Care Professionals.
英格兰国民保健署信托机构中脓毒症数字警报的看法和用途:医护专业人员的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 15;11:e56949. doi: 10.2196/56949.
4
Taking a Team Approach: Keep Up with the EHR with a Training and Optimization Program.采用团队协作方式:通过培训与优化计划紧跟电子健康记录系统的发展。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Jan;16(1):128-136. doi: 10.1055/a-2437-0185. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Longitudinal study of the manifestations and mechanisms of technology-related prescribing errors in pediatrics.儿科技术相关处方错误的表现及机制的纵向研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):105-112. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae218.
6
Sprint-inspired One-on-One Post-Go-Live Training Session (Mini-Sprint) Improves Provider Electronic Health Record Efficiency and Satisfaction.冲刺启发式一对一上线后培训课程(迷你冲刺)可提高医疗服务提供者使用电子健康记录的效率和满意度。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):313-319. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786368. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Factors impacting clinical data and documentation quality in Australian aged care and disability services: a user-centred perspective.影响澳大利亚老年护理和残疾服务临床数据和文档质量的因素:以用户为中心的视角。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04899-1.
8
Optimization of Electronic Health Record Usability Through a Department-Led Quality Improvement Process.通过部门主导的质量改进流程优化电子健康记录的可用性。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Mar 25;22(2):81-88. doi: 10.1370/afm.3073.
9
Optimising ePrescribing in hospitals through the interoperability of systems and processes: a qualitative study in the UK, US, Norway and the Netherlands.通过系统和流程的互操作性优化医院电子处方:在英国、美国、挪威和荷兰的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02316-y.
10
Early Performance of the Patients Over Paperwork Initiative among Family Medicine Physicians.家庭医学医师的“患者超越文书倡议”早期表现。
South Med J. 2023 Mar;116(3):255-263. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001526.