• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估儿科转运团队组成与培训的调查。

A Survey Assessing Pediatric Transport Team Composition and Training.

作者信息

Patel Meral M, Hebbar Kiran B, Dugan Mark C, Petrillo Toni

机构信息

From the Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine.

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 May;36(5):e263-e267. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001655.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001655
PMID:30399063
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess national pediatric/neonatal specialty transport teams' composition and training requirements to determine if any current standardization exists.

METHODS

This was a survey of the transport teams listed with the American Academy of Pediatrics via SurveyMonkey.

RESULTS

While most of the teams maintain internal criteria for team competency and training, there is large variation across team compositions. The vast majority of the teams have a nurse-led team with the addition of another nurse, medic, and/or respiratory therapist regardless of mode of transport. Many of the teams report adjusting team composition based on acuity. Fewer than 15% of teams have a physician as a standard team member. More than 80% required a minimum number of supervised intubations prior to independent practice; however, the number varied largely from as little as 3 to as many as 30. Eighty-eight percent of the teams report using simulation as part of their education program, but again there were marked differences between teams as to how it was used.

CONCLUSIONS

There is tremendous variability nationally among pediatric/neonatal transport teams regarding training requirements, certifications, and team composition. The lack of standardization regarding team member qualifications or maintenance of competency among specialized transport teams should be looked at more closely, and evidence-based guidelines may help lead to further improved outcomes in the care of critically ill pediatric patients in the prehospital setting.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全国儿科/新生儿专科转运团队的组成和培训要求,以确定目前是否存在任何标准化情况。

方法

这是一项通过SurveyMonkey对美国儿科学会列出的转运团队进行的调查。

结果

虽然大多数团队维持团队能力和培训的内部标准,但团队组成差异很大。绝大多数团队由一名护士领导,另外还有一名护士、急救医疗人员和/或呼吸治疗师,无论运输方式如何。许多团队报告根据病情严重程度调整团队组成。不到15%的团队有医生作为标准团队成员。超过80%的团队要求在独立执业前进行一定数量的监督下插管;然而,数量差异很大,少至3次,多至30次。88%的团队报告将模拟作为其教育计划的一部分,但同样,各团队在模拟的使用方式上存在显著差异。

结论

全国儿科/新生儿转运团队在培训要求、认证和团队组成方面存在巨大差异。应更密切地关注专业转运团队在团队成员资格或能力维持方面缺乏标准化的问题,基于证据的指南可能有助于进一步改善院前环境中危重症儿科患者的护理结果。

相似文献

1
A Survey Assessing Pediatric Transport Team Composition and Training.一项评估儿科转运团队组成与培训的调查。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 May;36(5):e263-e267. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001655.
2
National survey of neonatal transport teams in the United States.美国新生儿转运团队的全国性调查。
Pediatrics. 2011 Oct;128(4):685-91. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3796. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
3
Resident training in pediatric critical care transport medicine: a survey of pediatric residency programs.儿科重症监护转运医学的住院医师培训:儿科住院医师项目调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000 Jun;16(3):166-9. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200006000-00007.
4
Missed opportunities during pediatric residency training: report of a 10-year follow-up survey in critical care transport medicine.儿科住院医师培训期间错失的机会:危重症转运医学10年随访调查结果报告
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31823ed4ab.
5
Comparison of intubation skills between interfacility transport team members.医疗机构间转运团队成员插管技能的比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000 Feb;16(1):5-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200002000-00002.
6
Cross-sectional Survey of Canadian Pediatric Critical Care Transport.加拿大儿科重症监护转运横断面调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):32-37. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000853.
7
Pediatric and neonatal transport teams with and without a physician: a comparison of outcomes and interventions.有医生和无医生参与的儿科及新生儿转运团队:结局与干预措施的比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):77-82. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318030083d.
8
Workforce Survey of Pediatric Interfacility Transport Systems in the United States.美国儿科机构间转运系统劳动力调查
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Jun;32(6):364-70. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000448.
9
Pediatric Transport Triage: Development and Assessment of an Objective Tool to Guide Transport Planning.儿科转运分诊:一种用于指导转运规划的客观工具的开发与评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 May;36(5):240-247. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001641.
10
Pediatric critical care transport survey: team composition and training, mobilization time, and mode of transportation.儿科重症监护转运调查:团队组成与培训、动员时间及运输方式
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1990 Mar;6(1):1-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental experiences of the neonatal transfer process.新生儿转运过程中的家长经历。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04402-5.
2
A Multicenter Survey of Pediatric-Neonatal Transport Teams in the United States to Assess the Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Staffing.美国儿科-新生儿转运团队的多中心调查,以评估 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行对人员配备的影响。
Air Med J. 2023 May-Jun;42(3):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2023.01.016. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
3
A Descriptive Analysis of Pediatric Transports Throughout the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command.
对美国印太司令部辖区内儿科转运情况的描述性分析
Mil Med. 2021 Jul 1;186(7-8):e743-e748. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa506.