Kosaka Yoshimasa, Minatani Naoko, Tanaka Yoko, Shida Akiko, Kikuchi Mariko, Nishimiya Hiroshi, Waraya Mina, Katoh Hiroshi, Sato Takeo, Sengoku Norihiko, Tanino Hirokazu, Yamashita Keishi, Watanabe Masahiko
Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;9(5):566-574. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1716. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
In recent years, treatment options for breast cancer have increased, and prognosis has improved since the 1990s. The present study examined the prognosis for recurrence of breast cancer between 2006 and 2009, in comparison with the results of past treatments, and sought to guide future treatment strategies by elucidating present prognostic factors. A total of 662 patients with breast cancer stage 0-III who underwent surgery at Kitasato University Hospital between January 2006 and March 2009 were included. Cases were classified into four subtypes, based on the presence or absence of hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Factors associated with recurrence and prognosis were then examined. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 94.9% and the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 98.4%. Factors related to RFS were pathological lymph node (pN) positive [hazard ratio (HR)=2.85, P=0.001], clinical lymph node (cN) positive (HR=2.28, P<0.01), and hormone receptor negative (HR=1.83, P<0.05). Factors associated with DSS were cN positive (HR=4.55, P<0.01), pN positive (HR=3.40, P<0.05), higher preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (HR=3.04, P<0.05), and hormone receptor negative (HR=2.32, P<0.05). In the hormone receptor positive HER2 negative, cN-positive/pN-positive breast cancer group, RFS and DSS were poorer compared with the other groups. In this group, preoperative high CEA level was a poor prognostic factor. The prognosis for hormone receptor positive HER2-negative breast cancer has improved significantly since the 1990s. On the other hand, the prognosis for cN-positive/pN-positive breast cancer was poor. Pre-treatment serum CEA positive cases exhibited a particularly poor prognosis.
近年来,乳腺癌的治疗选择有所增加,自20世纪90年代以来预后有所改善。本研究调查了2006年至2009年间乳腺癌复发的预后情况,并与过去的治疗结果进行比较,旨在通过阐明当前的预后因素来指导未来的治疗策略。共有662例0至III期乳腺癌患者于2006年1月至2009年3月间在北里大学医院接受了手术。根据激素受体和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)的有无,将病例分为四种亚型。然后研究与复发和预后相关的因素。5年无复发生存率(RFS)为94.9%,5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)为98.4%。与RFS相关的因素有病理淋巴结(pN)阳性[风险比(HR)=2.85,P=0.001]、临床淋巴结(cN)阳性(HR=2.28,P<0.01)和激素受体阴性(HR=1.83,P<0.05)。与DSS相关的因素有cN阳性(HR=4.55,P<0.01)、pN阳性(HR=3.40,P<0.05)、术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)水平较高(HR=3.04,P<0.05)和激素受体阴性(HR=2.32,P<0.05)。在激素受体阳性HER2阴性、cN阳性/pN阳性乳腺癌组中,RFS和DSS较其他组差。在该组中,术前CEA水平高是一个不良预后因素。自20世纪90年代以来,激素受体阳性HER2阴性乳腺癌的预后有了显著改善。另一方面,cN阳性/pN阳性乳腺癌的预后较差。治疗前血清CEA阳性的病例预后尤其差。