Captur Gabriella, Arbustini Eloisa, Syrris Petros, Radenkovic Dina, O'Brien Ben, Mckenna William J, Moon James C
UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, London, UK.
Barts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Open Heart. 2018 Oct 25;5(2):e000915. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000915. eCollection 2018.
Two genotype-phenotype cardiac correlations are reported: first, that cardiac involvement in multisystem laminopathies prevails with mutations upstream of the nuclear localisation signal (NLS); second, that worse outcomes occur with non-missense (compared with missense) mutations. We tested whether mutation DNA location and mutation subtype can predict phenotype severity in patients with lamin heart disease.
We used a semantic workflow platform and manual electronic literature search to identify published mutations with cardiac-predominant phenotype. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) assembled lamin heart disease into classes based on phenotype severity. 176 reported causative mutations were classified and any relationships to mutation location/subtype assessed by contingency analysis.
More adverse phenotype was associated with mutation location upstream of the NLS (p=0.014, OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.80) but not with non-missense mutations (p=0.337, OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.57), although an association with non-missense mutations was identified in a subcluster with malignant ventricular arrhythmia (p=0.005, OR 2.64, 95% CI 0.76 to 9.21). HCA limited to the 65 mutations described on ClinVar as pathogenic/likely pathogenic showed similar findings (upstream of NLS, p=0.030, OR 4.78, 95% CI 1.28 to 17.83; non-missense, p=0.121, OR 2.64, 95% CI 0.76 to 9.21) as did analysis limited to pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics standards.
Cardiac patients with an mutation located upstream versus downstream of the NLS have a more adverse cardiac phenotype, and some missense mutations can be as harmful as non-missense ones.
报告了两种基因型与表型的心脏相关性:第一,多系统核纤层蛋白病中的心脏受累在核定位信号(NLS)上游的突变中更为常见;第二,与错义突变相比,无义突变的预后更差。我们测试了突变DNA位置和突变亚型是否可以预测核纤层蛋白心脏病患者的表型严重程度。
我们使用语义工作流程平台和手动电子文献检索来识别已发表的以心脏为主表型的突变。层次聚类分析(HCA)根据表型严重程度将核纤层蛋白心脏病分为不同类别。对176个已报道的致病突变进行分类,并通过列联分析评估与突变位置/亚型的任何关系。
更不良的表型与NLS上游的突变位置相关(p = 0.014,OR 2.38,95% CI 1.19至4.80),但与无义突变无关(p = 0.337,OR 1.36,95% CI 0.72至2.57),尽管在恶性室性心律失常的一个子簇中发现了与无义突变的关联(p = 0.005,OR 2.64,95% CI 0.76至9.21)。仅限于ClinVar上描述为致病/可能致病的65个突变的HCA显示了类似的结果(NLS上游,p = 0.030,OR 4.78,95% CI 1.28至17.83;无义,p = 0.121,OR 2.64,95% CI 0.76至9.21),根据美国医学遗传学和基因组学学会标准仅限于致病/可能致病变异的分析也是如此。
与NLS下游相比,突变位于上游的心脏病患者具有更不良的心脏表型,并且一些错义突变可能与无义突变一样有害。