Harris Charles T, Totten Michael, Davenport Daniel, Ye Zhan, O'Brien Julie, Williams Dennis, Bernard Andrew, Boral Leonard
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Oct 9;3(1):e000184. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000184. eCollection 2018.
BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is fundamental in resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock. Ready availability of uncrossmatched blood can be achieved by storing uncrossmatched blood in a blood bank refrigerator in the emergency department (ED), but could theoretically lead to inappropriate uncrossmatched use. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center from January 2013 to March 2014. Possibly inappropriate transfusion was defined as patients who received at least one unit of blood from the ED refrigerator and no more than two units of PRBC in the first 24 hours. Deaths within the first 24 hours were excluded. Patients who received blood from the ED refrigerator who received ≤2 units total in 24 hours were compared with those who received >2 units. RESULTS: 158 adults received blood from the ED refrigerator. 140 (88.6%) were trauma patients. 37 (23.4%) received massive transfusion (MT). 42 (26.6%) deaths were excluded. 29 patients received ≤2 units and 87 received >2 units in the first 24 hours. The ≤2 units group had a higher systolic blood pressure (116 mm Hg vs. 102 mm Hg, p=0.042), lower base deficit (6.4 mEq/L vs. 9.4 mEq/L, p=0.032), higher hematocrit (34% vs. 30%, p=0.024), lower rate of MT protocol activation (27.6% vs. 58.6%, p=0.005), and lower rates of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (17.2% vs. 54.0%, p=0.001) and platelets (13.8% vs. 39.1%, p=0.012). Appropriately transfused patients were more likely to have evidence of shock with active, non-compressible hemorrhage. Potentially inappropriate uses were more likely in patients either without evidence of hemorrhage or without signs of shock. DISCUSSION: Storing uncrossmatched blood in the ED is an effective way to get PRBCs transfused quickly in hemorrhaging patients and is associated with a low rate of unnecessary uncrossmatched transfusion. Provider education and good clinical judgment are imperative to prevent unnecessary use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.
背景:未交叉配血的红细胞(PRBC)输注是失血性休克复苏的基础。通过在急诊科(ED)的血库冰箱中储存未交叉配血的血液,可以随时获得未交叉配血的血液,但理论上可能导致不适当的未交叉配血使用。 方法:本回顾性研究于2013年1月至2014年3月在一级创伤中心进行。可能不适当的输血定义为在最初24小时内从急诊冰箱接受至少1单位血液且接受不超过2单位PRBC的患者。排除最初24小时内的死亡病例。将24小时内从急诊冰箱接受血液且总共接受≤2单位的患者与接受>2单位的患者进行比较。 结果:158名成年人从急诊冰箱接受了血液。140名(88.6%)为创伤患者。37名(23.4%)接受了大量输血(MT)。42名(26.6%)死亡病例被排除。29名患者在最初24小时内接受≤2单位,87名接受>2单位。≤2单位组的收缩压较高(116mmHg对102mmHg,p = 0.042),碱缺失较低(6.4mEq/L对9.4mEq/L,p = 0.032),血细胞比容较高(34%对30%,p = 0.024),MT方案激活率较低(27.6%对58.6%,p = 0.005),新鲜冰冻血浆输注率较低(17.2%对54.0%,p = 0.001)和血小板输注率较低(13.8%对39.1%,p = 0.012)。适当输血的患者更有可能有活动性、不可压缩性出血的休克证据。在没有出血证据或没有休克迹象的患者中,潜在不适当的使用更有可能发生。 讨论:在急诊科储存未交叉配血的血液是在出血患者中快速输注PRBC的有效方法,且不必要的未交叉配血输血率较低。必须进行提供者教育和良好的临床判断以防止不必要的使用。 证据水平:三级,治疗性。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018-10-9
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016-7
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024-5-2
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012-1
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020-1
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024-2-7
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023-1-1
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022-6-14
Crit Care Clin. 2017-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016-7-5
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014-8
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012-1
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010-11-24
Am J Clin Pathol. 2010-8