• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非手术难治性心源性休克患者的VA-ECMO支持:植入前结局预测因素

VA-ECMO Support in Nonsurgical Patients With Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Pre-Implant Outcome Predictors.

作者信息

Fux Thomas, Holm Manne, Corbascio Matthias, Lund Lars H, van der Linden Jan

机构信息

Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Division of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2019 Feb;43(2):132-141. doi: 10.1111/aor.13331. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1111/aor.13331
PMID:30402887
Abstract

Refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) is associated with a high mortality. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as acute cardiopulmonary support but selection of VA-ECMO candidates remains challenging. There are limited data on which pre-VA-ECMO variables that predict outcome. The aim of this study was to identify pre-VA-ECMO predictors of 90-day mortality. We retrospectively analyzed 76 consecutive patients (median age 52; interquartile range [IQR]: 37-60) supported with VA-ECMO due to RCS. The association between pre-implant variables and all-cause mortality at 90 days was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Main etiologies of RCS were acute myocardial infarction 51% and other AHF etiologies 49%. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in 54% of patients before initiation of VA-ECMO. Median duration of VA-ECMO was 5 days (IQR: 2-11). The 90-day overall mortality was 49% and in-hospital mortality was 50%; 46% died on VA-ECMO, 37% were successfully weaned, 13% were bridged to heart transplantation, and 4% to left ventricular assist device. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified arterial lactate (odds ratio [OR] per mmol/L: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.24; P = 0.001) and number of inotropes and vasopressors (OR per agent: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.26-3.63; P = 0.005) as independent predictors of 90-day mortality. In RCS patients arterial lactate level and number of inotropes and vasopressors were identified as independent pre-VA-ECMO predictors of 90-day mortality. Thus, the severity of cardiogenic shock expressed as levels of lactate and vasoactive agents just before start of VA-ECMO may be more predictive of outcome than the specific etiology of cardiogenic shock.

摘要

难治性心源性休克(RCS)与高死亡率相关。静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)越来越多地被用作急性心肺支持,但VA-ECMO候选者的选择仍然具有挑战性。关于哪些VA-ECMO前变量可预测预后的数据有限。本研究的目的是确定VA-ECMO前90天死亡率的预测因素。我们回顾性分析了76例因RCS接受VA-ECMO支持的连续患者(中位年龄52岁;四分位间距[IQR]:37-60岁)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析植入前变量与90天全因死亡率之间的关联。RCS的主要病因是急性心肌梗死占51%,其他急性心力衰竭病因占49%。54%的患者在开始VA-ECMO前进行了心肺复苏。VA-ECMO的中位持续时间为5天(IQR:2-11天)。90天总死亡率为49%,住院死亡率为50%;46%死于VA-ECMO,37%成功撤机,13%过渡到心脏移植,4%过渡到左心室辅助装置。多变量逻辑回归分析确定动脉血乳酸(每毫摩尔/升比值比[OR]:1.15;95%置信区间[CI]:1.06-1.24;P = 0.001)以及血管活性药物的数量(每种药物的OR:2.14;95%CI:1.26-3.63;P = 0.005)是90天死亡率的独立预测因素。在RCS患者中,动脉血乳酸水平以及血管活性药物的数量被确定为VA-ECMO前90天死亡率的独立预测因素。因此,在开始VA-ECMO之前以乳酸和血管活性药物水平表示的心源性休克严重程度可能比心源性休克的具体病因更能预测预后。

相似文献

1
VA-ECMO Support in Nonsurgical Patients With Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Pre-Implant Outcome Predictors.非手术难治性心源性休克患者的VA-ECMO支持:植入前结局预测因素
Artif Organs. 2019 Feb;43(2):132-141. doi: 10.1111/aor.13331. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
2
Mechanical support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO-VA): Short-term and long-term prognosis after a successful weaning.使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO-VA)进行机械支持:成功撤机后的短期和长期预后。
Med Intensiva. 2017 Dec;41(9):513-522. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy shock: Risk factors for mortality.体外膜肺氧合在心脏手术后休克中的应用:死亡率的危险因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;156(5):1894-1902.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.061. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Contemporary Use of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock in Acute Coronary Syndrome.当代静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合在急性冠状动脉综合征难治性心源性休克中的应用
J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Feb;28(2):52-7. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
Clinical predictors of in-hospital mortality in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗中院内死亡的临床预测因素
J Card Surg. 2020 Oct;35(10):2512-2521. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14758. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Percutaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated with Improved Short- and Long-Term Survival.经皮静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗难治性心源性休克可改善短期和长期生存率。
ASAIO J. 2016 Jul-Aug;62(4):397-402. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000378.
7
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in refractory cardiogenic shock: treatment strategies and analysis of risk factors.难治性心源性休克的体外膜肺氧合支持:治疗策略及危险因素分析
Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):E129-41. doi: 10.1111/aor.12317. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock post-cardiac arrest.心肺复苏后难治性心原性休克的静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1999-2007. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4541-y. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
[Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock in adults: strategies, results, and predictors of mortality].[体外膜肺氧合治疗成人难治性心源性休克:策略、结果及死亡预测因素]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2014 Oct;15(10):577-85. doi: 10.1714/1672.18312.
10
Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score.预测 ECMO 治疗难治性心源性休克后的生存率:静脉-动脉-体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)后生存率评分(SAVE 评分)。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 1;36(33):2246-56. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv194. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of age in prognostication of hospital mortality in postcardiotomy patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.年龄在体外膜肺氧合支持下的心内直视术后患者医院死亡率预后中的作用。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2025 May 29;21(2):221-228. doi: 10.5114/aic.2025.151722. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiovascular Surgical Patients: Single Center Practice and Experience.心血管外科患者的机械循环支持:单中心实践与经验
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 24;23(9):291. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309291. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in Management of Cardiogenic Shock.
体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)在心源休克管理中的应用
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 26;12(17):5576. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175576.
4
Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses.用于心源性休克患者的Impella与体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO):全面系统文献综述与荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Apr 5;10(4):158. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040158.
5
ECMO Retrieval Program: What Have We Learned So Far.体外膜肺氧合转运计划:我们目前学到了什么。
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;13(1):157. doi: 10.3390/life13010157.
6
The removal of floating right heart thrombi and pulmonary embolus using AngioJet device and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case report.使用AngioJet装置和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合清除漂浮性右心血栓和肺栓塞:一例报告
Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):612. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1542.
7
Early Blood Pressure Variables Associated With Improved Outcomes in VA-ECLS: The ELSO Registry Analysis.早期血压变量与 VA-ECLS 中改善的结局相关:ELSO 登记分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;10(6):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.04.003.
8
Long-Term Follow-Up of Survivors of Extracorporeal Life Support Therapy for Cardiogenic Shock: Are They Really Survivors?体外生命支持治疗心原性休克幸存者的长期随访:他们真的是幸存者吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 15;58(3):427. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030427.
9
Predictors of mortality following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in an unselected, critically ill patient population.在未经筛选的危重症患者群体中,体外膜肺氧合支持后死亡率的预测因素。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2021 Sep;17(3):290-297. doi: 10.5114/aic.2021.109149. Epub 2021 Sep 13.