Suppr超能文献

COMT Val158Met 多态性不会调节 tDCS 对工作记忆的后效。

The COMT Val Met polymorphism does not modulate the after-effect of tDCS on working memory.

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology Unit & Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Jan;49(2):263-274. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14261. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can alter cortical excitability, neural plasticity, and cognitive-behavioral performance; however, its effects are known to vary across studies. A partial account of this variability relates to individual differences in dopamine function. Indeed, dopaminergic manipulations alter the physiological and cognitive-behavioral effects of tDCS, and gene polymorphisms related to dopamine have predicted individual response to online tDCS (i.e., stimulation overlapping with the critical task). Notably, the role of individual differences in dopamine has not yet been properly assessed in the effect of offline tDCS (i.e., stimulation prior to the critical task). We investigated if and how the COMT Val Met polymorphism (rs4680) modulates the after-effect of prefrontal tDCS on verbal working memory (WM). One hundred and thirty-nine participants were genotyped for the COMT Val Met polymorphism and received anodal-over-left, cathodal-over-right (AL-CR), cathodal-over-left, anodal-over-right (CL-AR), or sham stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a between-subjects, pretest-posttest study design. WM was assessed using the N-back task. The results provide no evidence that the COMT polymorphism impacts the after-effect of prefrontal tDCS on WM. Taken together with previous findings on dopamine and tDCS interactions, the results of the present study suggest that (a) indirect markers of dopamine (such as COMT) are differently related to online and offline effects of tDCS, and (b) findings from studies involving pharmacological manipulation should be generalized with caution to findings of inter-individual differences. In sum, we argue that state (i.e., a manipulation of) and trait (i.e., baseline) differences in dopamine may exert different effects on online and offline tDCS.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可以改变皮质兴奋性、神经可塑性和认知行为表现;然而,其效果在不同的研究中是不同的。这种可变性的部分原因与多巴胺功能的个体差异有关。事实上,多巴胺能操纵改变了 tDCS 的生理和认知行为效果,与多巴胺相关的基因多态性预测了个体对在线 tDCS 的反应(即刺激与关键任务重叠)。值得注意的是,个体差异在离线 tDCS(即关键任务之前的刺激)的效果中尚未得到适当评估。我们研究了 COMT Val Met 多态性(rs4680)是否以及如何调节前额叶 tDCS 对言语工作记忆(WM)的后效。139 名参与者接受了 COMT Val Met 多态性的基因分型,并在背外侧前额叶皮层接受了阳极刺激左侧、阴极刺激右侧(AL-CR)、阴极刺激左侧、阳极刺激右侧(CL-AR)或假刺激,采用了一种基于个体的、前测后测研究设计。WM 使用 N-back 任务进行评估。结果没有证据表明 COMT 多态性影响前额叶 tDCS 对 WM 的后效。与之前关于多巴胺和 tDCS 相互作用的研究结果一起,本研究的结果表明:(a)多巴胺的间接标志物(如 COMT)与 tDCS 的在线和离线效果的关系不同,(b)涉及药物操纵的研究结果应谨慎推广到个体差异的发现。总之,我们认为多巴胺的状态(即操纵)和特质(即基线)差异可能对在线和离线 tDCS 产生不同的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be5/6590637/9bde272f4274/EJN-49-263-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验