English Department, College of Staten Island, City University of New York (CUNY), Staten Island, New York, USA.
J Homosex. 2020;67(3):398-416. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1534410. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
This study asks, What are the material conditions under which queer studies is done in the academy? It finds a longstanding association of queer studies with the well-resourced, selective colleges and flagship campuses that are the drivers of class and race stratification in higher education in the U.S. That is, the field of queer studies, as a recognizable academic formation, has been structured by the material and intellectual resources of precisely those institutions that most steadfastly refuse to adequately serve poor and minority students, including poor and minority queer students. In response, "poor queer studies" calls for a critical reorientation of queer studies toward working-poor schools, students, theories, and pedagogies. Taking the College of Staten Island, CUNY as a case study, it argues for structural crossing over or "queer-class ferrying" between high-status institutions that have so brilliantly dominated queer studies' history and low-status worksites of poor queer studies.
这项研究探讨了在学术界中进行酷儿研究的物质条件是什么。它发现,酷儿研究长期以来一直与资源充足、选择性强的学院和旗舰校区联系在一起,这些学院和校区是美国高等教育中阶级和种族分层的驱动力。也就是说,作为一个公认的学术领域,酷儿研究已经被那些最坚决拒绝充分服务贫困和少数族裔学生的机构的物质和知识资源所构建,包括贫困和少数族裔酷儿学生。对此,“贫困酷儿研究”呼吁对酷儿研究进行批判性重新定位,使其面向贫困学校、学生、理论和教学法。以纽约城市大学斯塔滕岛学院为例,它主张在那些在酷儿研究史上占据主导地位的高地位机构与贫困酷儿研究的低地位工作场所之间进行结构性跨越或“酷儿阶级摆渡”。