• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新立法,新领域:印度精神科医生对2017年《精神卫生保健法》实施前的看法。

New legislation, new frontiers: Indian psychiatrists' perspective of the mental healthcare act 2017 prior to implementation.

作者信息

Duffy Richard M, Narayan Choudhary L, Goyal Nishant, Kelly Brendan D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin D24 NR0A, Ireland.

Neuro Centre AN Magadh Medical College, Gaya, Bihar, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Sep;60(3):351-354. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_45_18.

DOI:10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_45_18
PMID:30405264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6201661/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The mental healthcare act 2017 represents a complete overhaul of Indian mental health legislation.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to establish the opinions of Indian psychiatrists regarding the new act.

SETTINGS

Mental health professionals in Bihar and Jharkhand were interviewed.

DESIGN

A focus group design was utilized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Key questions explored the positive and negative aspects of the act and the management of the transitional phase. All focus groups were recorded and transcribed.

ANALYSIS

Data were coded and analyzed using an inductive approach.

RESULTS

Many positive aspects of the new legislation were identified especially relating to rights, autonomy, and the decriminalization of suicide. However, psychiatrists have significant concerns that the new legislation may negatively impact patients and increase stigma. Psychiatrists held varying views on the proposed licensing and inspection of general hospital psychiatric units.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful evaluation of the new legislation is needed as the concerns raised warrant ongoing monitoring.

摘要

背景

2017年《精神卫生保健法》代表了印度精神卫生立法的全面改革。

目的

本研究的目的是确定印度精神科医生对新法案的看法。

背景

对比哈尔邦和贾坎德邦的精神卫生专业人员进行了访谈。

设计

采用焦点小组设计。

材料与方法

关键问题探讨了该法案的积极和消极方面以及过渡阶段的管理。所有焦点小组都进行了录音和转录。

分析

采用归纳法对数据进行编码和分析。

结果

新立法的许多积极方面得到了确认,特别是在权利、自主权和自杀非罪化方面。然而,精神科医生严重担心新立法可能对患者产生负面影响并增加污名化。精神科医生对提议的综合医院精神科病房的许可和检查持有不同观点。

结论

需要对新立法进行仔细评估,因为所提出的担忧值得持续监测。

相似文献

1
New legislation, new frontiers: Indian psychiatrists' perspective of the mental healthcare act 2017 prior to implementation.新立法,新领域:印度精神科医生对2017年《精神卫生保健法》实施前的看法。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Sep;60(3):351-354. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_45_18.
2
A Focus Group Study of Indian Psychiatrists' Views on Electroconvulsive Therapy under India's Mental Healthcare Act 2017: 'The Ground Reality is Different'.一项关于印度精神科医生对2017年《印度精神卫生保健法》下电休克治疗看法的焦点小组研究:“实际情况有所不同”
Indian J Psychol Med. 2019 Nov 11;41(6):507-515. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_247_19. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
3
Perceptions regarding the Indian Mental Healthcare Act 2017 among psychiatrists: Review and critical appraisal in the light of CRPD guidelines.精神科医生对2017年《印度精神卫生保健法》的看法:根据《残疾人权利公约》准则进行的回顾与批判性评估
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Mar 19;11:e39. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.31. eCollection 2024.
4
The Indonesian Mental Health Act: psychiatrists' views on the act and its implementation.印度尼西亚精神卫生法:精神科医生对该法及其实施的看法。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Mar 26;36(2):196-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa139.
5
India's Mental Healthcare Act, 2017: Content, context, controversy.印度 2017 年《精神卫生保健法案》:内容、背景、争议。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;62:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Exploring Psychiatrists' Experiences During Transition from Mental Health Act, 1987 to Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 in Goa, India.探索印度果阿邦精神科医生在从1987年《精神健康法》过渡到2017年《精神卫生保健法》期间的经历。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2024 Jan;46(1):32-38. doi: 10.1177/02537176231198404. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
7
Family matters! - The caregivers' perspective of Mental Healthcare Act 2017.家庭至关重要!——护理人员对2017年《精神卫生保健法》的看法。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S832-S837. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_141_19.
8
Psychiatrists' views on the New Zealand End of Life Choice Act.精神科医生对《新西兰选择结束生命法案》的看法。
Australas Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;30(2):254-261. doi: 10.1177/10398562221077889. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
9
Civil commitment of persons with mental illness: Comparison of the Mental Healthcare Act 2017 with corresponding legislations of the USA.精神疾病患者的民事强制收治:2017年《精神卫生保健法》与美国相关立法的比较。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S821-S826. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_81_19.
10
Psychiatrists' knowledge of the Human Rights Act and its relevance to mental health practice: a questionnaire survey.精神科医生对《人权法案》的了解及其与心理健康实践的相关性:一项问卷调查。
Med Sci Law. 2003 Apr;43(2):136-40. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.2.136.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions regarding the Indian Mental Healthcare Act 2017 among psychiatrists: Review and critical appraisal in the light of CRPD guidelines.精神科医生对2017年《印度精神卫生保健法》的看法:根据《残疾人权利公约》准则进行的回顾与批判性评估
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Mar 19;11:e39. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.31. eCollection 2024.
2
Mental Health Care Act, 2017: How to organize the services to avoid legal complications?《2017年精神卫生保健法》:如何组织服务以避免法律纠纷?
Indian J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;64(Suppl 1):S16-S24. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_743_21. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
3
The architecture of the primary mental healthcare system for older people in India: what public policies tell us.印度老年人初级精神卫生保健系统的架构:公共政策告诉了我们什么。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Aug 30;15(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00494-8.
4
A Focus Group Study of Indian Psychiatrists' Views on Electroconvulsive Therapy under India's Mental Healthcare Act 2017: 'The Ground Reality is Different'.一项关于印度精神科医生对2017年《印度精神卫生保健法》下电休克治疗看法的焦点小组研究:“实际情况有所不同”
Indian J Psychol Med. 2019 Nov 11;41(6):507-515. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_247_19. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
5
Comparing legislation for involuntary admission and treatment of mental illness in four South Asian countries.比较四个南亚国家关于精神疾病非自愿收治的立法。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Oct 24;13:67. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0322-7. eCollection 2019.
6
Family matters! - The caregivers' perspective of Mental Healthcare Act 2017.家庭至关重要!——护理人员对2017年《精神卫生保健法》的看法。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S832-S837. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_141_19.
7
Implications of Mental Healthcare Act 2017 for geriatric mental health care delivery: A critical appraisal.《2017年精神卫生保健法》对老年精神卫生保健服务的影响:批判性评估
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S763-S767. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_100_19.
8
Mental Healthcare Act 2017 - Aspiration to action.2017年精神卫生保健法——从愿景到行动。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S660-S666. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_91_19.

本文引用的文献

1
Concordance of the Indian Mental Healthcare Act 2017 with the World Health Organization's Checklist on Mental Health Legislation.《2017年印度精神卫生保健法》与世界卫生组织精神卫生立法清单的一致性
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017 Aug 18;11:48. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0155-1. eCollection 2017.
2
Mental Health Care Bill, 2016: A boon or bane?《2016年精神卫生保健法案》:是福还是祸?
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Jul-Sep;58(3):244-249. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.192015.
3
Paternalism v. autonomy - are we barking up the wrong tree?家长主义与自主 - 我们是否找错了方向?
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;209(2):95-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.181032.
4
Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.以人权之名逆转来之不易的胜利:对《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条一般性意见的批判
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;2(9):844-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00218-7. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
5
The mental health care bill 2013: a critical appraisal.《2013年精神卫生保健法案》:批判性评估
Indian J Psychol Med. 2015 Apr-Jun;37(2):215-9. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.155634.
6
The Mental Health Care Bill 2013: A step leading to exclusion of psychiatry from the mainstream medicine?《2013年精神卫生保健法案》:是否是将精神病学排除在主流医学之外的一步?
Indian J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;56(4):321-4. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.146509.
7
Contributions of general hospital psychiatric units to psychiatric research in India.综合医院精神科对印度精神医学研究的贡献。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;56(3):278-82. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.140644.
8
Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91.医学教育研究中焦点小组的运用:医学教育促进与研究协会指南第91号
Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):923-39. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
9
Mental health bill set to revolutionise care in India.心理健康法案将彻底改变印度的医疗护理。
Lancet. 2013 Jul 27;382(9889):296. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61620-7.
10
Mental health legislation and human rights in England, Wales and the Republic of Ireland.英格兰、威尔士和爱尔兰共和国的精神卫生立法与人权
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):439-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 21.