Klauss Jaisa, Anders Quézia Silva, Felippe Luna Vasconcelos, Ferreira Leonardo Villaverde Buback, Cruz Mateus Amorim, Nitsche Michael Andreas, Nakamura-Palacios Ester Miyuki
Laboratory of Cognitive Sciences and Neuropsychopharmacology, Program of Post-Graduation in Physiological Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil.
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Oct 23;9:1198. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01198. eCollection 2018.
Non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as additional therapeutic tool for drug use disorder. In a previous study, we showed that five sessions of tDCS applied bilaterally over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) reduced craving to the use of crack-cocaine in inpatients from a specialized clinic. In the present study, we examine if an extended number of sessions of the same intervention would reduce craving even further and affect also relapses to crack-cocaine use. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, clinical trial with parallel arms was conducted (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02091167). Crack-cocaine patients from two private and one public clinics for treatment of drug use disorder were randomly allocated to two groups: real tDCS (5 cm × 7 cm, 2 mA, for 20 min, cathodal over the left dlPFC and anodal over the right dlPFC, = 19) and sham-tDCS ( = 16). Real or sham-tDCS was applied once a day, every other day, in a total of 10 sessions. Craving was monitored by a 5-item obsessive compulsive drinking scale once a week (one time before, three times during and once after brain stimulation) over about 5 weeks and relapse was monitored after their discharge from clinics for up to 60 days. Craving scores progressively decreased over five measurements in both sham- and real tDCS groups. Corrected Hedges' within-group (initial and final) effect sizes of craving scores were of 0.77 for the sham-tDCS and of 0.97 for the real tDCS group. The between-groups effect size was of 0.34, in favor of the real tDCS group over sham-tDCS group. Relapse rates were high and quite similar between groups in the 30- and 60-days follow-up after discharge from the hospital. Extended repetitive bilateral tDCS over the dlPFC had no add-on effects over regular treatment when considering craving and relapses to the crack-cocaine use in a sample of crack-cocaine patients with severe use disorder. Different tDCS montages targeting other cortical regions and perhaps additional extension of sessions need to be investigated to reach more efficiency in managing craving and relapses to crack-cocaine use.
诸如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)之类的非侵入性脑刺激已被作为药物使用障碍的一种辅助治疗手段进行研究。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现对专门诊所的住院患者双侧背外侧前额叶皮质(dlPFC)进行5次tDCS治疗可降低对使用快克可卡因的渴望。在本研究中,我们探究相同干预方式增加治疗次数是否会进一步降低渴望,并影响快克可卡因使用的复吸情况。我们开展了一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照的平行组临床试验(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02091167)。来自两家私立诊所和一家公立诊所的快克可卡因药物使用障碍患者被随机分为两组:真正的tDCS组(电极片为5厘米×7厘米,电流2毫安,持续20分钟,阴极置于左侧dlPFC,阳极置于右侧dlPFC,n = 19)和假tDCS组(n = 16)。真正的或假的tDCS每隔一天进行一次,每天一次,共10次。在大约5周的时间里,每周(脑刺激前一次、刺激期间三次、刺激后一次)通过一个5项强迫性饮酒量表监测渴望程度,并在患者出院后长达60天内监测复吸情况。在假tDCS组和真正的tDCS组中,五次测量中渴望得分均逐渐降低。假tDCS组渴望得分经校正的组内(初始和最终)效应量为0.77,真正的tDCS组为0.97。组间效应量为0.34,表明真正的tDCS组优于假tDCS组。在出院后的30天和60天随访中,两组的复吸率都很高且相当相似。在患有严重使用障碍的快克可卡因患者样本中,考虑到对快克可卡因使用的渴望和复吸情况,对dlPFC进行延长的重复双侧tDCS相对于常规治疗没有额外效果。需要研究针对其他皮质区域的不同tDCS电极组合方式以及可能的进一步延长治疗次数,以提高在控制对快克可卡因使用的渴望和复吸方面的效率。