• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Enhancing Collaborative Ideation in Organizations.增强组织中的协作构思能力。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 22;9:2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02024. eCollection 2018.
2
Enhancing organizational processes for service innovation: strategic organizational counseling and organizational network analysis.增强服务创新的组织流程:战略组织咨询与组织网络分析
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Jan 29;9:1270501. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1270501. eCollection 2024.
3
The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs.创新实验室中共享领导力的出现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:685167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167. eCollection 2021.
4
Investigating the pathways between swift trust and team creativity among nursing student teams in Taiwan: A moderated mediation model.台湾护理专业学生团队中快速信任与团队创造力之间的路径探究:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 7;21(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01118-3.
5
Norms for creativity and implementation in healthcare teams: testing the group innovation inventory.医疗团队创造力和实施能力的规范:检验团体创新量表。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Aug;22(4):275-82. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq027. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
6
Innovation in Teams: The Role of Psychological Capital and Team Learning.团队中的创新:心理资本与团队学习的作用
J Psychol. 2022;156(2):133-146. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2021.2014391. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Coaching and leadership for the diffusion of innovation in health care: a different type of multi-organization improvement collaborative.医疗保健领域创新传播的指导与领导力:一种不同类型的多组织改进协作
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Feb;28(2):55-71. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28006-2.
8
An Extended AI-Experience: Industry 5.0 in Creative Product Innovation.拓展人工智能体验:创意产品创新中的工业 5.0。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 10;23(6):3009. doi: 10.3390/s23063009.
9
Effect of interdisciplinary teaching on collaborative interactions among nursing student teams in Taiwan: A quasi-experimental study.跨学科教学对台湾护理学生团队协作互动的影响:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Nov;106:105083. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105083. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Asynchronous Brainstorming in an Industrial Setting: Exploratory Studies.工业环境中的异步头脑风暴:探索性研究
Hum Factors. 2015 Sep;57(6):1076-94. doi: 10.1177/0018720815570374. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling Risk Profiles: A Latent Profile Analysis of 21st-Century Skills, Resistance to Change, and Cognitive Flexibility.揭示风险概况:对21世纪技能、变革阻力和认知灵活性的潜在概况分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70167. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70167.
2
Creative Process and Multivariate Factors through a Creative Course "Keep Calm and Be Creative".通过“保持冷静,发挥创造力”这一创意课程看创意过程及多变量因素。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 28;11(5):83. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050083.
3
Revisiting the Effects of Gender Diversity in Small Groups on Divergent Thinking: A Large-Scale Study Using Synchronous Electronic Brainstorming.重新审视小组中性别多样性对发散性思维的影响:一项使用同步电子头脑风暴的大规模研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 11;12:723235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723235. eCollection 2021.
4
Linking the Divergent and Convergent Processes of Collaborative Creativity: The Impact of Expertise Levels and Elaboration Processes.连接协作创造力的发散与聚合过程:专业水平和细化过程的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 12;10:699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00699. eCollection 2019.
5
Effects of Interpersonal Sensorimotor Synchronization on Dyadic Creativity: Gender Matters.人际感觉运动同步对二元创造力的影响:性别很重要。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 4;9:2604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02604. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research.剖析团队中文化多样性的影响:多元文化工作群体研究回顾与未来研究议程
J Int Bus Stud. 2021;52(1):4-22. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00389-9. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?情境化工作设计与员工创新工作行为:自主何时重要?
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204089. eCollection 2018.
3
Addressing the paradox of the team innovation process: A review and practical considerations.解决团队创新过程中的悖论:回顾与实践思考。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):363-375. doi: 10.1037/amp0000310.
4
Asynchronous Brainstorming in an Industrial Setting: Exploratory Studies.工业环境中的异步头脑风暴:探索性研究
Hum Factors. 2015 Sep;57(6):1076-94. doi: 10.1177/0018720815570374. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: a longitudinal study of productivity in research groups.群体异质性增加了大群体规模的风险:对研究群体生产力的纵向研究。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):880-90. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463082. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
The bias against creativity: why people desire but reject creative ideas.对创造力的偏见:为什么人们渴望但却拒绝创意。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):13-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421018. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
7
Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when.任务冲突与团队创造力:多少与何时的问题。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1173-80. doi: 10.1037/a0020015.
8
Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research.工作中创新的团队层面预测因素:跨越三十年研究的综合元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1128-45. doi: 10.1037/a0015978.
9
The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact.个体创意产生后的创意选择:在创造力和影响力之间做出选择。
Br J Psychol. 2010 Feb;101(Pt 1):47-68. doi: 10.1348/000712609X414204. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
10
The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.与自然互动对认知的益处。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.

增强组织中的协作构思能力。

Enhancing Collaborative Ideation in Organizations.

作者信息

Paulus Paul B, Baruah Jonali, Kenworthy Jared B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 22;9:2024. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02024. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02024
PMID:30405501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204394/
Abstract

Extensive research and theory has focused on organizational innovation and the organizational factors that influence that innovation. Research on teams has highlighted a similar set of factors as important for team innovation. However, these literatures have not provided a clear picture of the key factors that influence the collaborative idea exchange processes that occur in teams and organizations. The literature on collaborative ideation has provides a useful theoretical and empirical basis for understanding these processes and the conditions required for optimizing creativity in group interactions. We provide the theoretical and empirical basis for a pragmatic approach to enhancing collaborative innovation processes in various organizational settings and highlight additional research needs and future directions.

摘要

大量的研究和理论都聚焦于组织创新以及影响该创新的组织因素。关于团队的研究也强调了一组类似的因素对团队创新很重要。然而,这些文献并未清晰地呈现出影响团队和组织中发生的协作式想法交流过程的关键因素。关于协作构思的文献为理解这些过程以及在群体互动中优化创造力所需的条件提供了有用的理论和实证基础。我们为在各种组织环境中增强协作创新过程的务实方法提供了理论和实证基础,并突出了其他研究需求和未来方向。