Suppr超能文献

急诊科应用床旁超声检查不明原因急性呼吸及胸部不适病因的前瞻性分析

Point-of-care Ultrasonography for Detecting the Etiology of Unexplained Acute Respiratory and Chest Complaints in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis.

作者信息

Lamsam Layton, Gharahbaghian Laleh, Lobo Viveta

机构信息

School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Aug 28;10(8):e3218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3218.

Abstract

Introduction  Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used as a diagnostic tool in emergency departments. As the number and type of POCUS protocols expand, there is a need to validate their efficacy in comparison with current diagnostic standards. This study compares POCUS to chest radiography in patients with undifferentiated respiratory or chest complaints. Methods A prospective convenience sample of 59 adult patients were enrolled from those presenting with unexplained acute respiratory or chest complaints (and having orders for chest radiography) to a single emergency department in an academic tertiary-care hospital. After a brief educational session, a medical student, blinded to chest radiograph results, performed and interpreted images from the modified Rapid Assessment of Dyspnea in Ultrasound (RADiUS) protocol. The images were reviewed by a blinded ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physician and compared to chest radiography upon chart review. The primary "gold standard" endpoint diagnosis was the diagnosis at discharge. A secondary analysis was performed using the chest computed tomography (CT) diagnosis as the endpoint diagnosis in the subset of patients with chest CTs. Results When using diagnosis at discharge as the endpoint diagnosis, the modified RADiUS protocol had a higher sensitivity (79% vs. 67%) and lower specificity (71% vs. 83%) than chest radiography. When using chest CT diagnosis as the endpoint diagnosis (in the subset of patients with chest CTs), the modified RADiUS protocol had a higher sensitivity (76% vs. 65%) and lower specificity (71% vs. 100%) than chest radiography. The medical student performed and interpreted the 59 POCUS scans with 92% accuracy. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of POCUS using the modified RADiUS protocol was not significantly different than chest radiography. In addition, a medical student was able to perform the protocol and interpret scans with a high level of accuracy. POCUS has potential value for diagnosing the etiology of undifferentiated acute respiratory and chest complaints in adult patients presenting to the emergency department, but larger clinical validation studies are required.

摘要

引言 床旁超声(POCUS)在急诊科越来越多地被用作诊断工具。随着POCUS方案的数量和类型不断增加,有必要将其与当前诊断标准相比较以验证其有效性。本研究比较了POCUS与胸部X线摄影在有未分化呼吸或胸部症状患者中的应用。方法 从一所学术性三级医疗医院的单一急诊科中,选取了59例有不明原因急性呼吸或胸部症状(且已开具胸部X线摄影医嘱)的成年患者作为前瞻性便利样本。在简短的培训课程后,一名对胸部X线摄影结果不知情的医学生按照改良的超声呼吸困难快速评估(RADiUS)方案进行图像采集和解读。由一名对结果不知情的、接受过超声培训的急诊科医生对图像进行复查,并与病历审查时的胸部X线摄影结果进行比较。主要的“金标准”终点诊断是出院时的诊断。在有胸部CT的患者亚组中,进行了一项次要分析,以胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断作为终点诊断。结果 以出院时的诊断作为终点诊断时,改良的RADiUS方案比胸部X线摄影具有更高的敏感性(79%对67%)和更低的特异性(71%对83%)。以胸部CT诊断作为终点诊断(在有胸部CT的患者亚组中)时,改良的RADiUS方案比胸部X线摄影具有更高的敏感性(76%对65%)和更低的特异性(71%对(100%))。医学生对59次POCUS扫描的采集和解读准确率为(92%)。结论 使用改良RADiUS方案的POCUS的敏感性和特异性与胸部X线摄影无显著差异。此外,医学生能够按照该方案进行操作并以较高的准确率解读扫描结果。POCUS对于诊断急诊科成年患者未分化急性呼吸和胸部症状的病因具有潜在价值,但需要更大规模的临床验证研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验