• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于比较两种诊断试验预测值的联合优效性和非劣效性检验方法。

A combined superiority and non-inferiority procedure for comparing predictive values of two diagnostic tests.

作者信息

Takahashi Kanae, Yamamoto Kouji, Shintani Ayumi

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

J Appl Stat. 2024 Apr 4;51(14):2961-2979. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2335564. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/02664763.2024.2335564
PMID:39440237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11492406/
Abstract

Positive and negative predictive values are useful to quantify the performance of medical tests, and both are often used simultaneously. Although there are several methods to test the equality of these predictive values between two medical tests, these approaches separately compare positive and negative predictive values. Therefore, we propose a testing procedure that combines the approximate likelihood ratio test defined by Tang with the non-inferiority test for predictive values. The procedure can confirm that compared to an existing test, a new medical test is non-inferior in terms of both positive and negative predictive values, as well as superior regarding at least one of these values. It can make a comprehensive judgment of the performance of the new test based on both measures. A simulation study showed that the performance of the proposed testing procedure is appropriate, and the procedure is considered useful for evaluating the performance of predictive values of medical tests.

摘要

阳性预测值和阴性预测值对于量化医学检验的性能很有用,并且两者经常同时使用。虽然有几种方法可用于检验两种医学检验之间这些预测值的相等性,但这些方法分别比较阳性预测值和阴性预测值。因此,我们提出了一种检验程序,该程序将Tang定义的近似似然比检验与预测值的非劣效性检验相结合。该程序可以确认,与现有检验相比,一种新的医学检验在阳性预测值和阴性预测值方面均非劣效,并且在这些值中的至少一个方面更优。它可以基于这两种度量对新检验的性能做出全面判断。一项模拟研究表明,所提出的检验程序的性能是合适的,并且该程序被认为对于评估医学检验预测值的性能很有用。

相似文献

1
A combined superiority and non-inferiority procedure for comparing predictive values of two diagnostic tests.一种用于比较两种诊断试验预测值的联合优效性和非劣效性检验方法。
J Appl Stat. 2024 Apr 4;51(14):2961-2979. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2335564. eCollection 2024.
2
On testing simultaneously non-inferiority in two multiple primary endpoints and superiority in at least one of them.关于同时检验两个多个主要终点的非劣效性以及其中至少一个终点的优效性。
Biom J. 2006 Dec;48(6):916-33. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200510289.
3
An exact test for comparing two predictive values in small-size clinical trials.一种用于在小型临床试验中比较两个预测值的精确检验。
Pharm Stat. 2020 Jan;19(1):31-43. doi: 10.1002/pst.1968. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests.加权广义评分统计量用于比较诊断试验的预测值。
Stat Med. 2013 Mar 15;32(6):964-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5587. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
5
Testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.在活性对照临床试验中检验优效性和非劣效性假设。
Biom J. 2005 Feb;47(1):62-74; discussion 99-107. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410089.
6
Notes on testing non-inferiority under the partial verification design with a confirmatory procedure limited to screen positives.带有确认程序的部分验证设计下非劣效性检验的注释,该确认程序仅限于筛选阳性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 May;33(3):563-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
7
A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.一种通过多重决策过程进行非劣效性、等效性和优效性检验的统一方法。
Pharm Stat. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):193-203. doi: 10.1002/pst.305.
8
Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.使用似然比进行二项诊断测试的比较:ROC 曲线的基础。
Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):5821-30. doi: 10.1118/1.3503849.
9
Testing superiority at interim analyses in a non-inferiority trial.在非劣效性试验中进行期中分析的优越性检验。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1531-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.5312. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
10
Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs.配对设计二元医学诊断试验预测值的比较。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00345.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Joint comparison of the predictive values of multiple binary diagnostic tests: an extension of McNemar's test.多种二元诊断试验预测值的联合比较:McNemar检验的扩展
J Biopharm Stat. 2023 Jan 2;33(1):31-42. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2065500. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Predicting 90-day modified Rankin Scale score with discharge information in acute ischaemic stroke patients following treatment.根据治疗后急性缺血性脑卒中患者的出院信息预测90天改良Rankin量表评分。
BMJ Neurol Open. 2021 Jun 24;3(1):e000177. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000177. eCollection 2021.
3
Performance evaluation of the highly sensitive histidine-rich protein 2 rapid test for plasmodium falciparum malaria in North-West Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西北部高度敏感组氨酸丰富蛋白 2 快速检测试剂用于恶性疟原虫疟疾的效果评价。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 22;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03568-z.
4
An exact test for comparing two predictive values in small-size clinical trials.一种用于在小型临床试验中比较两个预测值的精确检验。
Pharm Stat. 2020 Jan;19(1):31-43. doi: 10.1002/pst.1968. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
5
Development and validation of a new score for predicting functional outcome of neurocritically ill patients: The INCNS score.开发并验证了一种新的评分系统,用于预测神经危重症患者的功能结局:INCNS 评分。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020 Jan;26(1):21-29. doi: 10.1111/cns.13134. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Point-of-care Ultrasonography for Detecting the Etiology of Unexplained Acute Respiratory and Chest Complaints in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Analysis.急诊科应用床旁超声检查不明原因急性呼吸及胸部不适病因的前瞻性分析
Cureus. 2018 Aug 28;10(8):e3218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3218.
7
Multivariate multidistance tests for high-dimensional low sample size case-control studies.高维小样本病例对照研究的多变量多距离检验
Stat Med. 2015 Apr 30;34(9):1511-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.6418. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
Multivariate tests based on interpoint distances with application to magnetic resonance imaging.基于点间距离的多元检验及其在磁共振成像中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Dec;25(6):2593-2610. doi: 10.1177/0962280214529104. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9
A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests.加权广义评分统计量用于比较诊断试验的预测值。
Stat Med. 2013 Mar 15;32(6):964-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5587. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs.比较诊断试验的预测值:配对研究设计的样本量与分析
Clin Trials. 2006;3(3):272-9. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn147oa.