Suppr超能文献

人们对遗传学有何看法?一项系统综述。

What do people think about genetics? A systematic review.

作者信息

LePoire Erin, Basu Baishakhi, Walker Lorelei, Bowen Deborah J

机构信息

University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Health Equity Circle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):171-187. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0394-0. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

Abstract

Genetics is increasingly becoming a part of modern medical practice. How people think about genetics' use in medicine and their daily lives is therefore essential. Earlier studies indicated mixed attitudes about genetics. However, this might be changing. Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) as a guideline, we initially reviewed 442 articles that looked at awareness, attitudes, knowledge, and perception of risks among the general and targeted recruitment populations. After fitting our criteria (from the last 5 years, conducted in the USA, non-provider populations, quantitative results reported, and assessed participants 18 years and older), finally 51 eligible articles were thematically coded and presented in this paper. Awareness is reported as relatively high in the studies reviewed. Attitudes are mixed but with higher proportions reporting positive attitudes towards genetic testing and counseling. Self-reported knowledge is reasonably high, specifically with the effects of specific programs developed to raise knowledge levels of the general and targeted recruited populations. Perception of risk is somewhat aligned with actual risk. With the reasonable positive reports of genetic awareness and knowledge, there is similar positive attitude and perception of risk, supporting the need for continued dissemination of such knowledge. Given interest in incorporating community participation in genomic educational strategies, we provide this review as a baseline from which to launch community-specific educational supports and tools.

摘要

遗传学正日益成为现代医学实践的一部分。因此,人们如何看待遗传学在医学及其日常生活中的应用至关重要。早期研究表明人们对遗传学的态度不一。然而,这种情况可能正在发生变化。我们以系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)为指导方针,最初检索了442篇研究普通人群和目标招募人群的认知、态度、知识以及风险感知的文章。在符合我们的标准(过去5年在美国开展、针对非医疗人员群体、报告定量结果且评估对象为18岁及以上人群)后,最终对51篇符合条件的文章进行了主题编码并呈现在本文中。在所审查的研究中,认知水平相对较高。态度不一,但对基因检测和咨询持积极态度的比例更高。自我报告的知识水平相当高,特别是在为提高普通人群和目标招募人群的知识水平而制定的特定项目的效果方面。风险感知与实际风险在一定程度上相符。鉴于对将社区参与纳入基因组教育策略存在兴趣,我们提供本综述作为开展针对特定社区的教育支持和工具的基线。

相似文献

1
What do people think about genetics? A systematic review.
J Community Genet. 2019 Apr;10(2):171-187. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0394-0. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
A comprehensive systematic review on the perception and experience of stigma among people with schizophrenia.
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(27):1132-1192. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109270-00001.
8
9
10
Knowledge of Genetics and Attitudes toward Genetic Testing among College Students in Saudi Arabia.
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(5):260-8. doi: 10.1159/000446511. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic testing and Guangdong college students in China: A cross-sectional study of knowledge and attitudes.
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jun 8;56:103133. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103133. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Knowledge and perception of medical students on genetics in the genomic era.
J Community Genet. 2025 Feb;16(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00748-1. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
4
Pregnant couples' attitude toward extended pre-conceptional genomic screening.
Croat Med J. 2024 Jun 13;65(3):189-197. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.189.
5
Perception of genomic newborn screening among peripartum mothers.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;32(2):163-170. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01497-4. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
6
Components, prospects and challenges of personalized prevention.
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;11:1075076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1075076. eCollection 2023.
7
Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.
Front Genet. 2020 Oct 23;11:570649. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649. eCollection 2020.
9
Attitudes towards genetic testing and information: does parenthood shape the views?
J Community Genet. 2020 Oct;11(4):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00462-8. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing confidence and changing behaviors in primary care providers engaged in genetic counselling.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0982-4.
2
A Culture of Understanding: Reflections and Suggestions from a Genomics Research Community Board.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(2):161-165. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0020.
3
Systematic Review of Quantitative Measures of Stakeholder Engagement.
Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Sep;10(5):314-336. doi: 10.1111/cts.12474. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
The impact of genomics on health outcomes, quality, and safety.
Nurs Manage. 2016 Apr;47(4):23-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000481844.50047.ee.
6
Parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in multiplex epilepsy families.
Epilepsia. 2016 Feb;57(2):279-87. doi: 10.1111/epi.13287. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143687. eCollection 2015.
8
"This lifetime commitment": Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening.
Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Feb;170A(2):363-374. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37459. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
9
Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: Consumers' perspectives.
Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Feb;170A(2):375-385. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37460. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
10
How do patient perceived determinants influence the decision-making process to accept or decline preimplantation genetic screening?
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jan;105(1):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验