Kaplan Benjamin, Caddle-Steele Carolyn, Chisholm Gregory, Esmond Warria A, Ferryman Kadija, Gertner Melvin, Goytia Crispin, Hauser Diane, Richardson Lynne D, Robinson Mimsie, Horowitz Carol R
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(2):161-165. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0020.
There has been limited community engagement in the burgeoning field of genomics research. In the wake of a new discovery of genetic variants that increase the risk of kidney failure and are almost unique to people of African ancestry, community and clinical leaders in Harlem, New York, formed a community board to inform the direction of related research. The board advised all aspects of a study to assess the impact of testing for these genetic variants at primary care sites that serve diverse populations, including explaining genetic risk to participants. By reflecting on the board's experiences, we found that community voices can have tangible impact on research that navigates the controversial intersection of race, ancestry, and genomics by heightening vigilance, fostering clear communication between researchers and the community, and encouraging researchers to cede some control. Our reflections and work provide a strong justification for longitudinal community partnerships in genomics research.
在新兴的基因组学研究领域,社区参与有限。在发现了增加肾衰竭风险且几乎为非洲裔人群所独有的基因变异之后,纽约哈莱姆区的社区和临床领导者成立了一个社区委员会,以指导相关研究的方向。该委员会为一项研究的各个方面提供了建议,该研究旨在评估在服务于不同人群的基层医疗点检测这些基因变异的影响,包括向参与者解释基因风险。通过反思该委员会的经验,我们发现社区的声音可以对涉及种族、血统和基因组学这一争议性交叉领域的研究产生切实影响,具体方式包括提高警惕、促进研究人员与社区之间的清晰沟通以及鼓励研究人员放弃一些控制权。我们的反思和工作为基因组学研究中的长期社区伙伴关系提供了有力的依据。