Taupua Waiora Centre for Māori Health Research, School of Public Health and Psychosocial Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, New Zealand.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Oct 31;31(8):606-612. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy227.
To critically examine, within the New Zealand context, the regulated-health practitioners' cultural competencies, their readiness to deliver culturally responsive health services to Māori (Indigenous peoples) and identify areas for development.
A mixed methods critical analysis of the regulatory bodies' cultural competency standards for health practitioners from their websites.
The New Zealand regulated-health workforce, legislated by the Health Practitioners' Competency Assurance Act 2003 and the Medical Practitioners Act 2007, requires practitioners to regularly demonstrate cultural competence.
The information provided on the websites of the 16 professional bodies for regulated-health practitioners.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): These standards were analysed against indicators of the knowledge-action-integration (KAI) framework for culturally responsive practice, and scored according to these being explicit, not explicit, or not evident.
Competency standards aligned to the 'knowledge' component were more likely to be explicit requirements. This included indicators related to understanding personal cultural values, beliefs, practices, assumptions, stereotypes and biases and the influence these have on practice. However, the 'action' and 'integration' components were less likely to be explicit. Five regulatory bodies provided no definitions of cultural competence. There was mixed engagement with te Tiriti o Waitangi or the Treaty of Waitangi.
Variation in clarity surrounding requirements for cultural competence/responsiveness exists across most health regulatory bodies. Notably, the measurability of many standards tended to lack precision. Universal cultural competence standards could support health practitioners to deliver an improved healthcare experience for Māori, emphasizing cultural competence as a quality and safety issue.
在新西兰背景下,批判性地审视受监管的医疗从业者的文化能力,他们为毛利人(原住民)提供文化响应式医疗服务的准备情况,并确定需要发展的领域。
对监管机构的文化能力标准进行混合方法的批判性分析,这些标准来自他们的网站。
新西兰受监管的医疗人员队伍由 2003 年的《卫生从业者能力保障法》和 2007 年的《医师法》立法规定,要求从业者定期展示文化能力。
受监管医疗从业者的 16 个专业机构网站上提供的信息。
这些标准根据文化响应实践的知识-行动-整合(KAI)框架的指标进行分析,并根据这些指标是明确的、不明确的或不明显的进行评分。
与“知识”部分一致的能力标准更有可能是明确的要求。这包括与理解个人文化价值观、信仰、实践、假设、刻板印象和偏见以及这些因素对实践的影响有关的指标。然而,“行动”和“整合”部分不太可能是明确的。五个监管机构没有提供文化能力的定义。《怀唐伊条约》或《怀唐伊条约》的参与情况参差不齐。
大多数健康监管机构在文化能力/响应能力的要求方面存在明确性的差异。值得注意的是,许多标准的可衡量性往往缺乏准确性。通用的文化能力标准可以支持医疗从业者为毛利人提供更好的医疗体验,强调文化能力是一个质量和安全问题。