Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):658-673. doi: 10.1111/dom.13569. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published observational evidence to assess the difference in the prevalence and progression of diabetic nephropathy, and the development of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in people from three different ethnic groups with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
Relevant studies were identified in a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists of relevant studies published up to May 2018. We decided a priori that there were no differences in the prevalence and progression of diabetic nephropathy, and the development of ESRD in the three ethnicities with T2DM. Pooled relative risks of microalbuminuria by ethnicity were estimated by fitting three random effects meta-analyses models. A narrative synthesis of the nephropathy progression in the studies was carried out. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107350).
Thirty-two studies with data on 153 827 unique participants were eligible for inclusion in the review. The pooled prevalence ratio of microalbuminuria in South Asian compared with white European participants was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99, 1.32; P = 0.065), while for African Caribbean vs South Asian participants the pooled prevalence ratio was 1.08 (95% CI 0.93, 1.24; P = 0.327). Results for renal decline were inconsistent, with preponderance towards a high rate of disease progression in South Asian compared with white participants. The estimated pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) for ESRD was significantly higher in African Caribbean vs white European participants: 2.75 (95% CI 2.01, 3.48; P < 0.001).
The results of this review did not show a significant link between ethnicity (South Asian, white European and African Caribbean) and the prevalence of microalbuminuria; however, the IRR for ESRD in African Caribbean compared with white European participants was significantly higher. Further research is needed to explore the potential non-albuminuric pathways of progression to ESRD.
系统评价和荟萃分析已发表的观察性证据,评估 3 种不同族裔的 2 型糖尿病患者中糖尿病肾病的患病率和进展以及终末期肾病(ESRD)的发生情况。
检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和相关研究参考文献,截至 2018 年 5 月,对符合条件的研究进行文献回顾。我们先验决定,在这 3 种族裔中,2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病肾病患病率和进展以及 ESRD 的发生情况没有差异。通过拟合 3 个随机效应荟萃分析模型,估计了不同种族的微量白蛋白尿的相对风险。对研究中的肾病进展进行了叙述性综合分析。本综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42018107350)上进行了注册。
纳入 32 项研究,共纳入 153827 例独特参与者。南亚裔参与者与白种欧洲参与者相比,微量白蛋白尿的汇总患病率比为 1.14(95%置信区间[CI]0.99 至 1.32;P=0.065),而非洲加勒比裔参与者与南亚裔参与者相比,汇总患病率比为 1.08(95%CI0.93 至 1.24;P=0.327)。肾脏衰退的结果不一致,南亚裔参与者疾病进展率较高。非洲加勒比裔参与者发生 ESRD 的估计汇总发病率比(IRR)明显高于白种欧洲参与者:2.75(95%CI2.01 至 3.48;P<0.001)。
本研究结果并未显示族裔(南亚裔、白种欧洲裔和非洲加勒比裔)与微量白蛋白尿的患病率之间存在显著关联;然而,非洲加勒比裔参与者发生 ESRD 的 IRR 明显高于白种欧洲裔参与者。需要进一步研究以探讨非白蛋白尿途径进展为 ESRD 的潜在机制。