Suppr超能文献

培养我们每个人的元认知:在跨学科灾害研究中思考“思考”。

Cultivating Metacognition in Each of Us: Thinking About "Thinking" in Interdisciplinary Disaster Research.

机构信息

Steven J. Green School of Public and International Affairs & the Extreme Events Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.

Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1136-1144. doi: 10.1111/risa.13226. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

Abstract

Although there is an emerging literature on interdisciplinary disaster research (IDR), one of the overlooked aspects relates to our thinking itself: how to actively think about our thinking-metacognition-while embarking on our interdisciplinary journeys. This article argues that metacognition has an instrumental value both for IDR projects and for individual researchers involved in IDR. For IDR projects, metacognition can help: (1)overcome disciplinary barriers in IDR by revealing cognitive abilities and inabilities for each team member through identifying what is hindering or enabling individuals and the group to transcend disciplinary boundaries toward true integration across the disciplines; (2)deal with "wicked" problems that characterize disaster contexts in a more effective and creative manner; (3)oversee team functioning; and (4)monitor and evaluate progress toward meeting project goals and objectives. For individual researchers, metacognition can help them grow intellectually, and understand the fallacies and limitations in their thinking. It can also encourage them to live an authentic and unified life as an individual. The article concludes with guidance on how individual researchers, principal investigators of IDR projects, and institutions such as universities and funding agencies can cultivate metacognition. To our knowledge, this is the first article that introduces metacognition as a tool for enhancing our thinking on IDR.

摘要

虽然跨学科灾难研究(IDR)领域的文献不断涌现,但有一个被忽视的方面与我们的思维本身有关:如何在开展跨学科研究之旅时积极思考我们的思维——元认知。本文认为,元认知对 IDR 项目和参与 IDR 的个人研究人员都具有工具价值。对于 IDR 项目,元认知可以帮助:(1)通过识别阻碍或促进个人和团队跨越学科界限实现真正跨学科融合的因素,克服 IDR 中的学科障碍,揭示每个团队成员的认知能力和不足;(2)以更有效和富有创意的方式应对以灾难为特征的“棘手”问题;(3)监督团队运作;(4)监测和评估项目目标的进展情况。对于个人研究人员,元认知可以帮助他们在智力上成长,并了解他们思维中的错误和局限性。它还可以鼓励他们作为个人过真实而统一的生活。文章最后介绍了个人研究人员、IDR 项目的首席研究员以及大学和资助机构等机构如何培养元认知的指导意见。据我们所知,这是第一篇将元认知作为增强我们对 IDR 思维的工具的文章。

相似文献

1
Cultivating Metacognition in Each of Us: Thinking About "Thinking" in Interdisciplinary Disaster Research.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1136-1144. doi: 10.1111/risa.13226. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
Building an Interdisciplinary Team for Disaster Response Research: A Data-Driven Approach.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1145-1151. doi: 10.1111/risa.13280. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
Lost in Translation? Integrating Interdisciplinary Disaster Research with Policy Praxis.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1232-1239. doi: 10.1111/risa.13198. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Expertise Across Disciplines: Establishing Common Ground in Interdisciplinary Disaster Research Teams.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1171-1177. doi: 10.1111/risa.13407. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
6
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Examining Postdisaster School Recovery.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1227-1231. doi: 10.1111/risa.13137. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
7
Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.
Eur J Philos Sci. 2019;9(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
8
The Frontiers of Uncertainty Estimation in Interdisciplinary Disaster Research and Practice.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1129-1135. doi: 10.1111/risa.13337. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
Thinking about thinking about thinking … & feeling: A model for metacognitive and meta-affective processes in task engagement.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Nov;13(6):e1618. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1618. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
10
Interdisciplinary Research as an Iterative Process to Build Disaster Systems Knowledge.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1072-1077. doi: 10.1111/risa.13244. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Expertise Across Disciplines: Establishing Common Ground in Interdisciplinary Disaster Research Teams.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1171-1177. doi: 10.1111/risa.13407. Epub 2019 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
A Sharing Meanings Approach for Interdisciplinary Hazards Research.
Risk Anal. 2021 Jul;41(7):1162-1170. doi: 10.1111/risa.13216. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
2
There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Aug;55:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
3
Teaching metacognitive skills: helping your physician trainees in the quest to 'know what they don't know'.
Am J Med. 2015 Mar;128(3):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: a method for respecting diversity in research partnerships.
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Sep;38(1-2):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9064-1.
5
Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition.
Conscious Cogn. 2000 Jun;9(2 Pt 1):313-23; discussion 324-6. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0450.
6
The use of clinical logs to improve nursing students' metacognition: a pilot study.
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Jul;28(1):149-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00777.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验