• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过敏反应与β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂使用的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Relationship Between Anaphylaxis and Use of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

机构信息

Allergy Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Allergy Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):879-897.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.042. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.042
PMID:30408615
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers (BBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have been associated with an increased risk and severity of anaphylaxis. However, the evidence supporting these findings is contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assess the influence of BBs and ACEIs on anaphylaxis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science for relevant observational studies. We searched for studies where the presence and severity of anaphylaxis were compared between patients taking BBs, ACEIs, both types of drug, or neither type of drug. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies met the study criteria. Of these, 15 assessed the severity and 9 the incidence of anaphylaxis. The studies brought together 22,313 anaphylaxis episodes for the severity studies and 18,101 anaphylaxis episodes for the studies of new cases of anaphylaxis. BBs and ACEIs increased the severity of anaphylaxis (BBs, odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.84; ACEIs, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12-2.16), but not the presence of new cases of anaphylaxis (BBs, OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.91-2.14; ACEIs, OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.39-4.86). It was not possible to perform an analysis adjusted for cardiovascular diseases, because only 1 study each for BBs and ACEIs, respectively, had adjusted data.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence showing that the use of BBs and ACEI increases the severity of anaphylaxis is low owing to differences in the control of confounders arising from the concomitant presence of cardiovascular diseases.

摘要

背景

β受体阻滞剂(BBs)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)与过敏反应的风险和严重程度增加有关。然而,支持这些发现的证据是相互矛盾的。

目的

我们对评估 BBs 和 ACEIs 对过敏反应影响的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。

方法

我们在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Web of Science 中搜索了相关的观察性研究。我们搜索了比较使用 BBs、ACEIs、两种药物或两种药物都不使用的患者过敏反应的存在和严重程度的研究。我们使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。

结果

共有 21 项研究符合研究标准。其中,15 项评估了过敏反应的严重程度,9 项评估了过敏反应的发生率。这些研究汇集了 22313 例过敏反应严重程度研究和 18101 例新过敏反应病例研究。BBs 和 ACEIs 增加了过敏反应的严重程度(BBs,比值比 [OR] 2.19,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.25-3.84;ACEIs,OR 1.56,95% CI 1.12-2.16),但不增加新过敏反应病例的出现(BBs,OR 1.40,95% CI 0.91-2.14;ACEIs,OR 1.38,95% CI 0.39-4.86)。由于心血管疾病同时存在,导致混杂因素的控制存在差异,因此无法对 BBs 和 ACEIs 分别进行调整后的数据分析。

结论

由于心血管疾病同时存在,导致混杂因素的控制存在差异,因此表明 BBs 和 ACEI 增加过敏反应严重程度的证据质量较低。

相似文献

1
Relationship Between Anaphylaxis and Use of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.过敏反应与β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂使用的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):879-897.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.042. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
2
Higher versus lower doses of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-2 receptor blockers and beta-blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.更高与更低剂量的 ACEI、ARB 和β受体阻滞剂在射血分数降低的心力衰竭中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212907. eCollection 2019.
3
Risk for Anaphylactic Reaction from Cardiac Catheterization in Patients Receiving β-Adrenergic Blockers or Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-Inhibitors.接受β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的患者进行心脏导管插入术时发生过敏反应的风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):1900-1905. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
Prevention of Trastuzumab and Anthracycline-induced Cardiotoxicity Using Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors or β-blockers in Older Adults With Breast Cancer.在老年乳腺癌患者中使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或β受体阻滞剂预防曲妥珠单抗和蒽环类药物引起的心脏毒性
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep;41(9):909-918. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000389.
5
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers therapy and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗与结直肠癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Sep;26(9):1245-55. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0617-1. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Angioedema Among Hypertensive Patients Treated with Aliskiren or Other Antihypertensive Medications in the United States.美国接受阿利克仑或其他抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者的血管性水肿。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2017 Dec;17(6):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s40256-017-0242-3.
7
The development of new-onset type 2 diabetes associated with choosing a calcium channel blocker compared to a diuretic or beta-blocker.与选择利尿剂或β受体阻滞剂相比,选择钙通道阻滞剂与新发2型糖尿病的发生有关。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1239-44. doi: 10.1185/030079907X188044. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
8
Comparative risk for angioedema associated with the use of drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.与使用靶向肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的药物相关的血管性水肿的比较风险。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 12;172(20):1582-9. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.34.
9
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors effect on arterial stiffness and wave reflections: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对动脉僵硬度和波反射的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Mar;221(1):18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
10
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular deaths, and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂对糖尿病患者全因死亡率、心血管死亡和心血管事件的影响:荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):773-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.348.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of food allergy reaction severity: biomarkers and host factors.食物过敏反应严重程度的预测:生物标志物与宿主因素
Front Allergy. 2025 Aug 13;6:1578601. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1578601. eCollection 2025.
2
Identifying patients at risk of anaphylaxis.识别有过敏反应风险的患者。
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jun 11;17(6):100904. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100904. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: National Database Analysis.药物性过敏反应:全国数据库分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jan 9;17(1):90. doi: 10.3390/ph17010090.
4
Comparison of recent anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria in real life: Can more patients be diagnosed as having anaphylaxis?现实生活中近期过敏反应诊断标准的比较:能否诊断出更多的过敏反应患者?
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Aug 26;16(8):100810. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100810. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Impact of Outpatient Antihypertensive Medication Use on Epinephrine Resistance in Anaphylaxis.门诊抗高血压药物使用对过敏反应中肾上腺素抵抗的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 17;15(2):e35119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35119. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Anaphylaxis in elderly people.老年人过敏反应。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec 1;22(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000855. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
Risk factors for severe reactions in food allergy: Rapid evidence review with meta-analysis.食物过敏严重反应的危险因素:快速证据综述与荟萃分析。
Allergy. 2022 Sep;77(9):2634-2652. doi: 10.1111/all.15318. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
Management of anaphylaxis due to COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly.老年人因 COVID-19 疫苗而产生的过敏反应的管理。
Allergy. 2021 Oct;76(10):2952-2964. doi: 10.1111/all.14838.
9
β-blockers and ACE inhibitors are not a risk factor for severe systemic sting reactions and adverse events during venom immunotherapy.β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不是严重全身性蜂蜇反应和变应原免疫治疗期间不良事件的危险因素。
Allergy. 2021 Jul;76(7):2166-2176. doi: 10.1111/all.14785. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020.世界过敏组织2020年过敏反应指南
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Oct 30;13(10):100472. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472. eCollection 2020 Oct.