Allergy Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Allergy Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):879-897.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.042. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
Beta-blockers (BBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have been associated with an increased risk and severity of anaphylaxis. However, the evidence supporting these findings is contradictory.
We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that assess the influence of BBs and ACEIs on anaphylaxis.
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science for relevant observational studies. We searched for studies where the presence and severity of anaphylaxis were compared between patients taking BBs, ACEIs, both types of drug, or neither type of drug. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model.
A total of 21 studies met the study criteria. Of these, 15 assessed the severity and 9 the incidence of anaphylaxis. The studies brought together 22,313 anaphylaxis episodes for the severity studies and 18,101 anaphylaxis episodes for the studies of new cases of anaphylaxis. BBs and ACEIs increased the severity of anaphylaxis (BBs, odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.84; ACEIs, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.12-2.16), but not the presence of new cases of anaphylaxis (BBs, OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.91-2.14; ACEIs, OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.39-4.86). It was not possible to perform an analysis adjusted for cardiovascular diseases, because only 1 study each for BBs and ACEIs, respectively, had adjusted data.
The quality of evidence showing that the use of BBs and ACEI increases the severity of anaphylaxis is low owing to differences in the control of confounders arising from the concomitant presence of cardiovascular diseases.
β受体阻滞剂(BBs)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)与过敏反应的风险和严重程度增加有关。然而,支持这些发现的证据是相互矛盾的。
我们对评估 BBs 和 ACEIs 对过敏反应影响的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。
我们在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Web of Science 中搜索了相关的观察性研究。我们搜索了比较使用 BBs、ACEIs、两种药物或两种药物都不使用的患者过敏反应的存在和严重程度的研究。我们使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。
共有 21 项研究符合研究标准。其中,15 项评估了过敏反应的严重程度,9 项评估了过敏反应的发生率。这些研究汇集了 22313 例过敏反应严重程度研究和 18101 例新过敏反应病例研究。BBs 和 ACEIs 增加了过敏反应的严重程度(BBs,比值比 [OR] 2.19,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.25-3.84;ACEIs,OR 1.56,95% CI 1.12-2.16),但不增加新过敏反应病例的出现(BBs,OR 1.40,95% CI 0.91-2.14;ACEIs,OR 1.38,95% CI 0.39-4.86)。由于心血管疾病同时存在,导致混杂因素的控制存在差异,因此无法对 BBs 和 ACEIs 分别进行调整后的数据分析。
由于心血管疾病同时存在,导致混杂因素的控制存在差异,因此表明 BBs 和 ACEI 增加过敏反应严重程度的证据质量较低。