Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz, Vienna, Austria.
Allergy. 2021 Jul;76(7):2166-2176. doi: 10.1111/all.14785. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
There is controversy whether taking β-blockers or ACE inhibitors (ACEI) is a risk factor for more severe systemic insect sting reactions (SSR) and whether it increases the number or severity of adverse events (AE) during venom immunotherapy (VIT).
In this open, prospective, observational, multicenter trial, we recruited patients with a history of a SSR and indication for VIT. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients taking β-blockers or ACEI show more systemic AE during VIT compared to patients without such treatment.
In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. Of all patients included, 388 (27.2%) took antihypertensive (AHT) drugs (10.4% took β-blockers, 11.9% ACEI, 5.0% β-blockers and ACEI). Only 5.6% of patients under AHT treatment experienced systemic AE during VIT as compared with 7.4% of patients without these drugs (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43-1.22, p = 0.25). The severity of the initial sting reaction was not affected by the intake of β-blockers or ACEI (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.89-1.46, p = 0.29). In total, 210 (17.7%) patients were re-stung during VIT and 191 (91.0%) tolerated the sting without systemic symptoms. Of the 19 patients with VIT treatment failure, 4 took β-blockers, none an ACEI.
This trial provides robust evidence that taking β-blockers or ACEI does neither increase the frequency of systemic AE during VIT nor aggravate SSR. Moreover, results suggest that these drugs do not impair effectiveness of VIT. (Funded by Medical University of Graz, Austria; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04269629).
服用β受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)是否是更严重全身性昆虫蜇伤反应(SSR)的危险因素,以及它是否会增加变应原免疫治疗(VIT)期间不良反应(AE)的数量或严重程度,目前仍存在争议。
在这项开放、前瞻性、观察性、多中心试验中,我们招募了有 SSR 病史和 VIT 适应证的患者。本研究的主要目的是评估服用β受体阻滞剂或 ACEI 的患者在 VIT 期间是否比未接受此类治疗的患者表现出更多的全身性 AE。
共纳入 1425 例患者,其中 1342 例患者接受了 VIT。所有纳入患者中,388 例(27.2%)服用抗高血压药物(AHT)(10.4%服用β受体阻滞剂,11.9%服用 ACEI,5.0%同时服用β受体阻滞剂和 ACEI)。在 VIT 期间,接受 AHT 治疗的患者中仅有 5.6%出现全身性 AE,而未服用这些药物的患者中为 7.4%(OR:0.74,95%CI:0.43-1.22,p=0.25)。β受体阻滞剂或 ACEI 的摄入并不影响初始蜇伤反应的严重程度(OR:1.14,95%CI:0.89-1.46,p=0.29)。在 VIT 期间,共有 210 例(17.7%)患者再次被蜇,其中 191 例(91.0%)蜇伤后无全身性症状。在 19 例 VIT 治疗失败的患者中,有 4 例服用β受体阻滞剂,无 1 例服用 ACEI。
本试验提供了有力的证据表明,服用β受体阻滞剂或 ACEI 既不会增加 VIT 期间全身性 AE 的频率,也不会加重 SSR。此外,结果表明这些药物不会影响 VIT 的疗效。(由奥地利格拉茨医科大学资助;Clinicaltrials.gov 编号:NCT04269629)。