• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不是严重全身性蜂蜇反应和变应原免疫治疗期间不良事件的危险因素。

β-blockers and ACE inhibitors are not a risk factor for severe systemic sting reactions and adverse events during venom immunotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Allergy. 2021 Jul;76(7):2166-2176. doi: 10.1111/all.14785. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1111/all.14785
PMID:33605465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8359427/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy whether taking β-blockers or ACE inhibitors (ACEI) is a risk factor for more severe systemic insect sting reactions (SSR) and whether it increases the number or severity of adverse events (AE) during venom immunotherapy (VIT).

METHODS

In this open, prospective, observational, multicenter trial, we recruited patients with a history of a SSR and indication for VIT. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients taking β-blockers or ACEI show more systemic AE during VIT compared to patients without such treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. Of all patients included, 388 (27.2%) took antihypertensive (AHT) drugs (10.4% took β-blockers, 11.9% ACEI, 5.0% β-blockers and ACEI). Only 5.6% of patients under AHT treatment experienced systemic AE during VIT as compared with 7.4% of patients without these drugs (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43-1.22, p = 0.25). The severity of the initial sting reaction was not affected by the intake of β-blockers or ACEI (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.89-1.46, p = 0.29). In total, 210 (17.7%) patients were re-stung during VIT and 191 (91.0%) tolerated the sting without systemic symptoms. Of the 19 patients with VIT treatment failure, 4 took β-blockers, none an ACEI.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial provides robust evidence that taking β-blockers or ACEI does neither increase the frequency of systemic AE during VIT nor aggravate SSR. Moreover, results suggest that these drugs do not impair effectiveness of VIT. (Funded by Medical University of Graz, Austria; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04269629).

摘要

背景

服用β受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)是否是更严重全身性昆虫蜇伤反应(SSR)的危险因素,以及它是否会增加变应原免疫治疗(VIT)期间不良反应(AE)的数量或严重程度,目前仍存在争议。

方法

在这项开放、前瞻性、观察性、多中心试验中,我们招募了有 SSR 病史和 VIT 适应证的患者。本研究的主要目的是评估服用β受体阻滞剂或 ACEI 的患者在 VIT 期间是否比未接受此类治疗的患者表现出更多的全身性 AE。

结果

共纳入 1425 例患者,其中 1342 例患者接受了 VIT。所有纳入患者中,388 例(27.2%)服用抗高血压药物(AHT)(10.4%服用β受体阻滞剂,11.9%服用 ACEI,5.0%同时服用β受体阻滞剂和 ACEI)。在 VIT 期间,接受 AHT 治疗的患者中仅有 5.6%出现全身性 AE,而未服用这些药物的患者中为 7.4%(OR:0.74,95%CI:0.43-1.22,p=0.25)。β受体阻滞剂或 ACEI 的摄入并不影响初始蜇伤反应的严重程度(OR:1.14,95%CI:0.89-1.46,p=0.29)。在 VIT 期间,共有 210 例(17.7%)患者再次被蜇,其中 191 例(91.0%)蜇伤后无全身性症状。在 19 例 VIT 治疗失败的患者中,有 4 例服用β受体阻滞剂,无 1 例服用 ACEI。

结论

本试验提供了有力的证据表明,服用β受体阻滞剂或 ACEI 既不会增加 VIT 期间全身性 AE 的频率,也不会加重 SSR。此外,结果表明这些药物不会影响 VIT 的疗效。(由奥地利格拉茨医科大学资助;Clinicaltrials.gov 编号:NCT04269629)。

相似文献

1
β-blockers and ACE inhibitors are not a risk factor for severe systemic sting reactions and adverse events during venom immunotherapy.β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不是严重全身性蜂蜇反应和变应原免疫治疗期间不良事件的危险因素。
Allergy. 2021 Jul;76(7):2166-2176. doi: 10.1111/all.14785. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors do not impair the safety of Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy build-up phase.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不会损害膜翅目毒液免疫治疗起始阶段的安全性。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(5):747-55. doi: 10.1111/cea.12276.
3
Venom immunotherapy for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings.用于预防昆虫叮咬过敏反应的毒液免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD008838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008838.pub2.
4
Biomarkers of the Severity of Honeybee Sting Reactions and the Severity and Threshold of Systemic Adverse Events During Immunotherapy.蜂蜇反应严重程度的生物标志物和免疫治疗期间全身性不良反应的严重程度和阈值。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Aug;9(8):3157-3163.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.04.045. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
Clinical effectiveness of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: a prospective observational multicenter study of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology interest group on insect venom hypersensitivity.蜂毒免疫治疗的临床疗效:变应原免疫治疗临床实践指南欧洲专家组关于昆虫毒液过敏的前瞻性观察性多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2013 May 20;8(5):e63233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063233. Print 2013.
6
Safety of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with insect venom allergies.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在昆虫毒液过敏患者中的安全性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Apr;40(4):699-703. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G295. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
7
Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy while maintaining cardiovascular medication: safe and effective.维持心血管药物治疗时进行膜翅目毒液免疫疗法:安全有效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 May;114(5):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.03.001.
8
Duration of venom immunotherapy: relationship to the severity of symptoms of initial insect sting anaphylaxis.毒液免疫疗法的持续时间:与初始昆虫叮咬过敏反应症状严重程度的关系。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993 Dec;92(6):831-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90060-s.
9
A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Pharmalgen® for the treatment of bee and wasp venom allergy.Phamalgen® 治疗蜂和黄蜂毒液过敏的临床疗效和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(12):III-IV, 1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta16120.
10
A twenty-two-year experience with Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy in a US pediatric tertiary care center 1996-2018.美国一家儿科三级护理中心 1996-2018 年 22 年蜂类毒液免疫治疗经验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Dec;121(6):722-728.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-related factors impact the implementation of inpatient antibiotic allergy delabeling.患者相关因素影响住院患者抗生素过敏标签去除的实施。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Aug 21;3(4):100326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100326. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Safety and Efficacy of VIT against Wasp Venom in Ultra-Rush Protocols in Patients Older Than 60 Years.60岁以上患者超快速方案中VIT对抗黄蜂毒液的安全性和有效性。
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 16;12(5):547. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050547.
3
Risk Factors Associated with Severe Systemic Allergic Reaction after Wasp Sting in Subjects with a History of European Hornet Sting Allergy.有欧洲大黄蜂蜇伤过敏史的受试者黄蜂蜇伤后严重全身过敏反应的相关危险因素。
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 20;63(2):66-72. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0010. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy: S2k Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Berufs- und Umweltdermatologie e.V. (ABD), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), German Respiratory Society (DGP), and the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI).膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏的诊断与治疗:德国变态反应与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)与职业与环境皮肤病学会(ABD)、德国变态反应科医生协会(AeDA)、德国皮肤病学会(DDG)、德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(DGHNOKC)、德国儿科学与青少年医学学会(DGKJ)、儿童变态反应与环境医学学会(GPA)、德国呼吸学会(DGP)以及奥地利变态反应与免疫学会(ÖGAI)联合发布的S2k指南
Allergol Select. 2023 Oct 2;7:154-190. doi: 10.5414/ALX02430E. eCollection 2023.
5
Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2K Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SSAI), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (BVHNO), German Association of Paediatric and Adolescent Care Specialists (BVKJ), Federal Association of Pneumologists, Sleep and Respiratory Physicians (BdP), Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD).IgE介导的过敏性疾病变应原免疫治疗指南:德国变态反应与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)、儿科变态反应与环境医学学会(GPA)、德国变态反应学家医学协会(AeDA)、奥地利变态反应与免疫学会(ÖGAI)、瑞士变态反应与免疫学会(SSAI)、德国皮肤病学会(DDG)、德国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(DGHNO-KHC)、德国儿科学与青少年医学学会(DGKJ)、儿科肺病学会(GPP)、德国呼吸学会(DGP)、德国耳鼻喉科医生专业协会(BVHNO)、德国儿科与青少年护理专家协会(BVKJ)、联邦肺病学家、睡眠与呼吸内科医生协会(BdP)、德国皮肤科医生专业协会(BVDD)的S2K指南
Allergol Select. 2022 Sep 6;6:167-232. doi: 10.5414/ALX02331E. eCollection 2022.
6
Anaphylaxis in elderly people.老年人过敏反应。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec 1;22(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000855. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
Venom immunotherapy: safety and tolerability of the build-up phase with depot versus aqueous preparations.毒液免疫疗法:与水性制剂相比,长效注射制剂在递增阶段的安全性和耐受性
Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 Oct;52(10):1230-1233. doi: 10.1111/cea.14209. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
8
[Allergen immunotherapy: FAQs and facts].[变应原免疫疗法:常见问题与事实]
Hautarzt. 2021 Sep;72(9):760-769. doi: 10.1007/s00105-021-04872-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotype and risk factors of venom-induced anaphylaxis: A case-control study of the European Anaphylaxis Registry.毒液诱导过敏反应的表型和危险因素:欧洲过敏登记处的病例对照研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb;147(2):653-662.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
2
Relationship Between Anaphylaxis and Use of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.过敏反应与β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂使用的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):879-897.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.042. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Patients Taking β-Blockers Do Not Require Increased Doses of Epinephrine for Anaphylaxis.β受体阻滞剂使用者在发生过敏反应时无需增加肾上腺素剂量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1553-1558.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: Hymenoptera venom allergy.EAACI 指南:变应原免疫治疗:蜂类毒液过敏。
Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):744-764. doi: 10.1111/all.13262. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Evaluation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker therapy in immunotherapy-associated systemic reactions.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1430-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Hymenoptera stings in the head region induce impressive, but not severe sting reactions.头部的膜翅目昆虫蜇伤可引起显著但不严重的蜇伤反应。
Allergy. 2016 Nov;71(11):1632-1634. doi: 10.1111/all.12967. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Safety and tolerability during build-up phase of a rush venom immunotherapy.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Apr;116(4):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.02.014.
8
Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy while maintaining cardiovascular medication: safe and effective.维持心血管药物治疗时进行膜翅目毒液免疫疗法:安全有效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 May;114(5):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.03.001.
9
Ramipril and metoprolol intake aggravate human and murine anaphylaxis: evidence for direct mast cell priming.雷米普利和美托洛尔摄入加重人类和鼠类过敏反应:直接肥大细胞致敏的证据。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Feb;135(2):491-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
10
Venom immunotherapy in patients with clonal mast cell disorders: efficacy, safety, and practical considerations.变应原免疫治疗在克隆性肥大细胞疾病患者中的疗效、安全性和实际考虑。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;1(5):474-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Aug 30.