• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊抗高血压药物使用对过敏反应中肾上腺素抵抗的影响。

Impact of Outpatient Antihypertensive Medication Use on Epinephrine Resistance in Anaphylaxis.

作者信息

Snider Christopher S, Hasara Shannon L, Wilson Kayla M, Glueck Jesse A, Barbera Andrew R

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Lakeland Regional Health, Lakeland, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Lakeland Regional Health, Lakeland, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Feb 17;15(2):e35119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35119. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.35119
PMID:36945274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10024959/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an increase in allergy-related emergency department (ED) visits over the past several years. Underlying cardiovascular disease or respiratory disease and concurrent beta blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use have been identified as potential risk factors for severe or refractory anaphylactic reactions. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the association between antihypertensive (AH) use and the incidence of refractory anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of refractory anaphylaxis in patients presenting to the ED while prescribed select AH medications outpatient.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult and pediatric patients presenting to the ED between February 16, 2021, and August 31, 2021, with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of patients experiencing refractory anaphylaxis that were prescribed versus not prescribed AH medications in the outpatient setting.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were treated for anaphylaxis in the ED during the study timeframe with 13 patients in the AH group and 88 patients in the no AH group. There was no difference in the incidence of refractory anaphylaxis between groups (0% vs 9%; p=0.48). Significantly fewer patients in the AH group required any epinephrine doses compared to the no AH group (38% vs 88%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient use of select AH medications was not associated with an increased incidence of refractory anaphylaxis in patients presenting to the ED.

摘要

背景

在过去几年中,与过敏相关的急诊科就诊人数有所增加。潜在的心血管疾病或呼吸系统疾病以及同时使用β受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂已被确定为严重或难治性过敏反应的潜在危险因素。关于使用抗高血压药(AH)与难治性过敏反应发生率之间的关联,存在相互矛盾的证据。

目的

本研究的目的是确定在门诊开具特定AH药物的情况下,就诊于急诊科的患者中难治性过敏反应的发生率。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2021年2月16日至2021年8月31日期间就诊于急诊科且诊断为过敏反应的所有成人和儿童患者。主要目的是比较在门诊环境中开具与未开具AH药物的患者中发生难治性过敏反应的比例。

结果

在研究期间,共有101例患者在急诊科接受了过敏反应治疗,其中AH组有13例患者,非AH组有88例患者。两组之间难治性过敏反应的发生率没有差异(0%对9%;p=0.48)。与非AH组相比,AH组中需要使用任何肾上腺素剂量的患者明显更少(38%对88%;p<0.001)。

结论

门诊使用特定的AH药物与就诊于急诊科的患者中难治性过敏反应发生率的增加无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecb0/10024959/d326dd8eace6/cureus-0015-00000035119-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecb0/10024959/d326dd8eace6/cureus-0015-00000035119-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecb0/10024959/d326dd8eace6/cureus-0015-00000035119-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Outpatient Antihypertensive Medication Use on Epinephrine Resistance in Anaphylaxis.门诊抗高血压药物使用对过敏反应中肾上腺素抵抗的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 17;15(2):e35119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35119. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Anaphylaxis management in the pediatric emergency department: opportunities for improvement.儿科急诊科的过敏反应管理:改进的机会
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Feb;26(2):71-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181ce2e1c.
3
Antihypertensive medication use is associated with increased organ system involvement and hospitalization in emergency department patients with anaphylaxis.抗高血压药物的使用与急诊过敏反应患者的器官系统受累和住院治疗增加有关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Apr;131(4):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
Emergency department visits for food allergy in Taiwan: a retrospective study.台湾地区因食物过敏而前往急诊科就诊的情况:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2014 Aug;55(4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.11.006. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
5
PEMCRC anaphylaxis study protocol: a multicentre cohort study to derive and validate clinical decision models for the emergency department management of children with anaphylaxis.PEMCRC 过敏反应研究方案:一项多中心队列研究,旨在为急诊科管理过敏反应儿童开发和验证临床决策模型。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e037341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037341.
6
Evaluating Practice Patterns of Observation Periods Following Epinephrine Administration for Anaphylaxis Among Pediatric Patients.评估儿科患者过敏性反应肾上腺素给药后观察期的实践模式。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 14;16(9):e69419. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69419. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Temporal Trends in Epinephrine Dispensing and Allergy/Immunology Follow-up Among Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients in the United States, 2005-2014.美国 2005-2014 年急诊过敏反应患者肾上腺素给药和过敏/免疫学随访的时间趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1272-1279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Evaluation of Anaphylaxis Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科过敏反应管理的评估
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Aug;32(8):508-13. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000864.
9
Epidemiology and clinical predictors of biphasic reactions in children with anaphylaxis.过敏反应儿童双相反应的流行病学及临床预测因素
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Sep;115(3):217-223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
10
Retrospective study of drug-induced anaphylaxis treated in the emergency department or hospital: patient characteristics, management, and 1-year follow-up.回顾性研究在急诊科或医院治疗的药物性过敏反应:患者特征、处理方法和 1 年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020.世界过敏组织2020年过敏反应指南
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Oct 30;13(10):100472. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Increasing Allergy-Related Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2007 to 2015.2007年至2015年美国与过敏相关的急诊科就诊人数不断增加。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2983-2988. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.056. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
3
Refractory Anaphylaxis: Data From the European Anaphylaxis Registry.难治性过敏反应:来自欧洲过敏登记处的数据。
Front Immunol. 2019 Oct 18;10:2482. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02482. eCollection 2019.
4
Relationship Between Anaphylaxis and Use of Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.过敏反应与β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂使用的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):879-897.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.042. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Patients Taking β-Blockers Do Not Require Increased Doses of Epinephrine for Anaphylaxis.β受体阻滞剂使用者在发生过敏反应时无需增加肾上腺素剂量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1553-1558.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Are ACE Inhibitors and Beta-blockers Dangerous in Patients at Risk for Anaphylaxis?血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂在过敏反应风险患者中是否危险?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1207-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.04.033. Epub 2017 May 25.
7
Antihypertensive medication use is associated with increased organ system involvement and hospitalization in emergency department patients with anaphylaxis.抗高血压药物的使用与急诊过敏反应患者的器官系统受累和住院治疗增加有关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Apr;131(4):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Feb 27.