Finnvold Jon Erik
Norwegian Social Research (NOVA), Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4. St. Olavs plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3670-0.
The foreign-born population in Norway displays considerable diversity in terms of source country, socioeconomic status and settlement experience. This study assessed the consequences of this diversity for the risk of being admitted to hospital with a serious condition. To what extent could variations between immigrant and native-born hospitalisation patterns be accounted for by variations in income, education and residential area characteristics?
The study linked information on socioeconomic and geographical level-of-living factors involving 2,820,283 individuals between 20 and 69 years old to hospital admissions recorded in Norway's National Patient Registry. Immigrants from 11 of the most frequently represented countries were included. The outcome variable consisted of a selection of relatively serious diagnoses (neoplasms and endocrine, circulatory and respiratory diseases), totalling 548,140 admissions from 2008 to 2011. Age- and gender-adjusted admission rates were analysed using a Poisson regression.
The adjustments for income and education reduced the hospitalisation rates of almost all immigrant groups. The groups whose previous rates were above native-born rates moved towards the Norwegian reference, whereas groups that initially had lower age- and gender-adjusted rates compared with the Norwegian-born population increased the distance to the Norwegian reference. The risk of hospitalisation among most immigrant groups decreased compared with the Norwegian-born population when their income and educational levels were accounted for. Particularly, immigrants with lower levels of income or education tended to have relatively low hospitalisation rates, indicating the possibility of a healthy immigrant effect. While many immigrant groups used less somatic healthcare than the native-born population did, higher educational or income levels did not prevent hospitalisation to the same extent as they did for the native-born population.
Although adjustments for socioeconomic factors tended towards lower hospitalisation rates for most immigrant groups, the adjustments did not reduce the considerable variations among individual countries.
挪威的外国出生人口在来源国、社会经济地位和定居经历方面存在很大差异。本研究评估了这种差异对因严重疾病住院风险的影响。移民和本土出生者住院模式的差异在多大程度上可以由收入、教育和居住地区特征的差异来解释?
该研究将涉及2820283名20至69岁个体的社会经济和地理生活水平因素信息与挪威国家患者登记处记录的住院情况相联系。纳入了来自11个最常见来源国的移民。结果变量包括一系列相对严重的诊断(肿瘤以及内分泌、循环和呼吸系统疾病),2008年至2011年共有548140例住院病例。使用泊松回归分析年龄和性别调整后的住院率。
对收入和教育的调整降低了几乎所有移民群体的住院率。之前住院率高于本土出生者的群体向挪威参考水平靠拢,而最初年龄和性别调整后住院率低于挪威出生人口的群体与挪威参考水平的差距增大。考虑到收入和教育水平后,大多数移民群体的住院风险与挪威出生人口相比有所降低。特别是,收入或教育水平较低的移民往往住院率相对较低,这表明可能存在健康移民效应。虽然许多移民群体使用的躯体医疗服务比本土出生者少,但较高的教育或收入水平并不能像对本土出生者那样在同等程度上预防住院。
尽管对社会经济因素的调整往往使大多数移民群体的住院率降低,但这些调整并没有减少各个国家之间的显著差异。