• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与最佳药物治疗在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者中的疗效。

Comparison of successful percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijengbu, Republic of Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;73(2):156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.08.006
PMID:30409701
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a challenging entity in coronary interventions. With improvements in technology and techniques, success rates for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTO continue to improve. However, the clinical benefits of PCI remain unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of successful PCI on clinical outcomes using drug-eluting stents in patients with CTO.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2010, we analyzed 898 patients with at least one CTO who underwent successful PCI (n=424, 448 lesions) or only medical treatment (n=474, 519 lesions) from a multicenter registry. The primary outcome was all-cause death.

RESULTS

During a median of 2.2 years, incidence rate of all-cause death after successful PCI was lower than that after medical treatment (10.6% and 17.5%, p=0.004). However, the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that successful PCI was not associated with improvement in mortality compared to medical treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.24, p=0.38]. Comparable results were obtained after propensity-score matching. Subgroup analysis of propensity-score matched population demonstrated that patients with age under 65 years benefited from successful PCI (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.75, p for interaction=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients considered for CTO intervention, medical treatment appears to be associated with a similar mortality compared to successful PCI. Successful CTO PCI might be associated with survival benefit in younger patients compared to medical treatment.

摘要

背景

慢性完全闭塞(CTO)是冠状动脉介入治疗中的一个具有挑战性的实体。随着技术和技术的进步,CTO 的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)成功率继续提高。然而,PCI 的临床获益仍不清楚。本研究旨在使用药物洗脱支架确定成功 PCI 对 CTO 患者临床结局的有效性。

方法

我们分析了 2004 年至 2010 年期间,898 例至少有一条 CTO 并接受成功 PCI(n=424,448 个病变)或仅接受药物治疗(n=474,519 个病变)的患者,这些患者来自一个多中心登记处。主要结局是全因死亡。

结果

在中位数为 2.2 年的随访期间,成功 PCI 后全因死亡率低于药物治疗(10.6%和 17.5%,p=0.004)。然而,多变量 Cox 比例风险模型显示,与药物治疗相比,成功 PCI 与死亡率的改善无关[校正风险比(HR)0.84,95%置信区间(CI)0.57-1.24,p=0.38]。倾向评分匹配后也得到了类似的结果。倾向评分匹配人群的亚组分析表明,年龄小于 65 岁的患者从成功 PCI 中获益(HR 0.25,95%CI 0.08-0.75,p 交互=0.005)。

结论

在考虑进行 CTO 干预的患者中,药物治疗与成功 PCI 相比,死亡率似乎相似。与药物治疗相比,成功的 CTO PCI 可能与年轻患者的生存获益相关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of successful percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与最佳药物治疗在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者中的疗效。
J Cardiol. 2019 Feb;73(2):156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
2
Survival after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变后的生存率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Nov;105(11):921-929. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1000-2. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
Successful Recanalization of Native Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Is Not Associated With Improved Long-Term Survival.原位冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞再通与长期生存改善无关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 28;9(6):530-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.016. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Five-Year Outcomes of Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents versus Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Occlusions.药物洗脱支架成功经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的五年结局
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Jul;59(5):602-610. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.5.602.
5
Chronic total occlusion intervention of the non-infarct-related artery in acute myocardial infarction patients: the Korean multicenter chronic total occlusion registry.急性心肌梗死患者非梗死相关动脉慢性完全闭塞病变的介入治疗:韩国多中心慢性完全闭塞病变注册研究
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Sep;29(6):495-501. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000630.
6
Late Survival Benefit of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗对冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者生存获益的比较:一项 10 年随访研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019022. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019022. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架内慢性完全闭塞的操作及长期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May 8;10(9):892-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.047. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion With Well-Developed Collaterals.慢性完全闭塞病变伴侧支循环良好患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与最佳药物治疗的比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 13;6(9):e006357. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006357.
9
Successful versus unsuccessful antegrade recanalization of single chronic coronary occlusion: eight-year experience and outcomes by a propensity score ascertainment.单支慢性冠状动脉闭塞成功与不成功的顺行再通:倾向评分确定法的八年经验及结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):E49-57. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25841. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
A comparison of procedural success rate and long-term clinical outcomes between in-stent restenosis chronic total occlusion and de novo chronic total occlusion using multicenter registry data.多中心注册研究数据比较支架内再狭窄慢性完全闭塞和初发慢性完全闭塞患者的介入治疗成功率和长期临床结局。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 May;109(5):628-637. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01550-7. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.慢性完全闭塞患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与最佳药物治疗的Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 May 15;13(10):2919. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102919.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease: An umbrella review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与稳定型冠状动脉疾病的最佳药物治疗:一项伞状综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 2;10(5):e27210. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27210. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
3
Revascularization of chronic total occlusion coronary artery and cardiac regeneration.
慢性完全闭塞冠状动脉的血运重建与心脏再生
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 25;9:940808. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.940808. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus the optimal drug therapy (ODT) for stable coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与稳定型冠心病最佳药物治疗(ODT)的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Apr;14(4):1183-1192. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-222.
5
Comparison of the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction between percutaneous coronary intervention with versus without rotational atherectomy using propensity score-matching.应用倾向评分匹配比较旋磨术辅助与非旋磨术辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者围术期心肌梗死的发生率。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90042-8.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Successful Recanalization Compared With Optimal Medical Therapy for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.左心室收缩功能障碍患者与非左心室收缩功能障碍患者冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞成功再通与最佳药物治疗的长期结局比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Apr 20;8:654730. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.654730. eCollection 2021.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention provided better long term results than optimal medical therapy alone in patients with chronic total occlusion: A meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在慢性完全闭塞患者中优于单纯最佳药物治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Indian Heart J. 2020 Jul-Aug;72(4):225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
8
Long-term outcomes of medical therapy versus successful recanalisation for coronary chronic total occlusions in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.比较有/无 2 型糖尿病的冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者药物治疗与血运重建成功后长期预后。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Jul 4;19(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01087-4.
9
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗慢性冠状动脉完全闭塞的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019 Aug 9;21(10):42. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0804-8.