Section of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
Department and Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;90(7):813-821. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318297. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
At the interface between mind and body, psychiatry and neurology, functional neurological disorder (FND) remains poorly understood. Formerly dominant stress-related aetiological models have been increasingly challenged, in part due to cases without any history of past or recent trauma. In this perspective article, we review current evidence for such models, and how research into the role of traumatic stress in other disorders and the neurobiology of the stress response can inform our mechanistic understanding of FND. First, we discuss the association between stress and the onset or exacerbation of a variety of physical and mental health problems. Second, we review the role of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in the neurobiology of ill-health, alongside evidence for similar mechanisms in FND. Third, we advocate a stress-diathesis model, in which biological susceptibility interacts with early life adversity, where FND can be precipitated by traumatic events later in life and maintained by psychological responses. We hypothesise that greater biological susceptibility to FND is associated with less severe remote and recent stress, and that FND precipitated by more severe stress is associated with lower biological vulnerability. This would explain clinical experience of variable exposure to historical and recent traumatic stress among people with FND and requires empirical investigation. A testable, evidence-based stress-diathesis model can inform nuanced understanding of how biological and psychological factors interact at the individual level, with potential to inform personalised treatment pathways. Much-needed research to establish the aetiology of FND will enhance clinical care and communication, facilitate effective treatment and inform prevention strategies.
在身心、精神病学和神经科学的交界处,功能性神经障碍(FND)仍然难以理解。以前占主导地位的与压力相关的病因模型越来越受到挑战,部分原因是有些病例没有过去或近期创伤的病史。在这篇观点文章中,我们回顾了这些模型的现有证据,以及研究创伤性应激在其他疾病中的作用以及应激反应的神经生物学如何为我们对 FND 的机制理解提供信息。首先,我们讨论了压力与各种身心健康问题的发病或恶化之间的关联。其次,我们回顾了下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能障碍在不健康的神经生物学中的作用,以及在 FND 中类似机制的证据。第三,我们提倡应激素质模型,其中生物易感性与早期生活逆境相互作用,FND 可以由以后生活中的创伤性事件引发,并通过心理反应维持。我们假设,FND 的生物易感性越大,与远程和近期压力的严重程度越低相关,而由更严重的压力引发的 FND 与较低的生物脆弱性相关。这将解释为什么 FND 患者中存在对历史和近期创伤性应激的暴露存在个体差异,需要进行实证研究。一个可测试的、基于证据的应激素质模型可以为个体层面上生物和心理因素如何相互作用提供细致的理解,有可能为个性化治疗途径提供信息。为确定 FND 的病因而进行的急需研究将增强临床护理和沟通,促进有效治疗,并为预防策略提供信息。