Jaeger Brittany, Reems Miryam
BluePearl Veterinary Partners, 3000 Busch Lake Blvd, Tampa, Florida 33614, USA.
Can Vet J. 2018 Nov;59(11):1171-1174.
Canine blood was visually inspected for hemolysis and compared with the Food and Drug Administration's standard of less than 1% hemolysis as measured by plasma-free hemoglobin. This was the basis for deciding to transfuse or dispose of stored canine blood. Free hemoglobin was measured in stored red blood cell units and compared to a calculated 1% hemolysis. Veterinarians and technicians determined if they would transfuse units based on visual inspection for hemolysis. Their evaluation was compared to the calculated hemolysis cutoff. The evaluations of veterinarians and technicians were significantly different from the mathematically derived cutoff. The technicians' visual assessments of the usability of samples were significantly different from those of the veterinarians: technicians more frequently judged the sample as unusable. Experienced veterinary personnel both over- and under-estimate the degree of hemolysis in stored canine RBCs. We recommend objective analysis of the amount of free hemoglobin in stored blood prior to transfusion.
对犬类血液进行肉眼检查是否存在溶血,并与美国食品药品监督管理局规定的以无血浆血红蛋白测量的溶血率低于1%的标准进行比较。这是决定输注或处理储存的犬类血液的依据。测量储存红细胞单位中的游离血红蛋白,并与计算得出的1%溶血率进行比较。兽医和技术人员根据肉眼检查溶血情况来决定是否输注血液单位。将他们的评估结果与计算得出的溶血临界值进行比较。兽医和技术人员的评估结果与数学推导得出的临界值存在显著差异。技术人员对样本可用性的视觉评估与兽医的评估存在显著差异:技术人员更频繁地判定样本不可用。经验丰富的兽医人员对储存的犬类红细胞中的溶血程度存在高估和低估的情况。我们建议在输血前对储存血液中的游离血红蛋白量进行客观分析。