Hosono Masayoshi, Matsuda Takeru, Yamashita Kimihiro, Hasegawa Hiroshi, Yamamoto Masashi, Kanaji Shingo, Oshikiri Taro, Nakamura Tetsu, Sumi Yasuo, Suzuki Satoshi, Kakeji Yoshihiro
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Oct;12(4):401-407. doi: 10.1111/ases.12665. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
Although a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) or a transnasal or transanal decompression tube is sometimes used as a bridge to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer, the optimal decompression procedure to achieve successful laparoscopic surgery remains unclear.
Forty-two patients with obstructive colorectal cancer who were preoperatively decompressed by using SEMS (the SEMS group, n = 20) or a decompression tube (the DT group, n = 22) between January 2010 and February 2017 were included in this retrospective study.
In the SEMS group, 20 patients (100%) were able to eat and 17 patients (85%) were able to undergo total colonoscopy preoperatively, but no patients could do so in the DT group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). The serum albumin level increased in the time between admission and just before surgery in five patients in the SEMS groups (25%), whereas it decreased in all patients in the DT group (P = 0.037). Laparoscopic surgery was performed more frequently in the SEMS groups (19 patients, 95%) than in the DT group (13 patients, 59.1%) (P = 0.018). Primary anastomosis without stoma was also achieved more frequently in the SEMS groups (19 patients, 95%) than in the DT group (15 patients, 68.2%) (P = 0.047). Anastomotic leakage did not occur in the SEMS group, but it did occur in one patient in the DT group. The recurrence-free survival rate did not differ between the groups (median follow-up period: 21 months).
In patients with obstructive colorectal cancer, SEMS appears to be more effective than a decompression tube as a preoperative treatment to achieve successful laparoscopic resection without stoma.
尽管自膨式金属支架(SEMS)或经鼻或经肛门减压管有时被用作阻塞性结直肠癌患者手术的桥梁,但实现成功腹腔镜手术的最佳减压程序仍不清楚。
本回顾性研究纳入了2010年1月至2017年2月期间42例术前使用SEMS(SEMS组,n = 20)或减压管(DT组,n = 22)进行减压的阻塞性结直肠癌患者。
在SEMS组中,20例患者(100%)术前能够进食,17例患者(85%)能够进行全结肠镜检查,但DT组中无患者能够做到这一点(分别为P < 0.01和P < 0.01)。SEMS组中有5例患者(25%)在入院至手术前血清白蛋白水平升高,而DT组所有患者血清白蛋白水平均下降(P = 0.037)。SEMS组比DT组更频繁地进行腹腔镜手术(19例患者,95%比13例患者,59.1%)(P = 0.018)。SEMS组比DT组更频繁地实现无造口的一期吻合(19例患者,95%比15例患者,68.2%)(P = 0.047)。SEMS组未发生吻合口漏,但DT组有1例患者发生吻合口漏。两组间无复发生存率差异(中位随访期:21个月)。
对于阻塞性结直肠癌患者,作为术前治疗手段,SEMS似乎比减压管更有效,能够实现成功的无造口腹腔镜切除术。