Gould Justin, Klis Magdalena, Porter Bradley, Sidhu Baldeep S, Sieniewicz Benjamin J, Williams Steven E, Teall Thomas, Webb Jessica, Shetty Anoop, Gill Jaswinder, Rinaldi Christopher A
Department of Cardiology, Lower Ground Floor, South Wing, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):73-84. doi: 10.1111/pace.13542. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) may be necessary due to infective and noninfective indications. We aim to identify predictors of 30-day mortality and risk factors between infective versus noninfective groups and systemic versus local infection subgroups.
A total of 925 TLEs between October 2000 and December 2016 were prospectively collected and dichotomized (infective group n = 505 vs noninfective group n = 420 and systemic infection n = 164 vs local infection n = 341).
All-cause major complication including deaths was significantly higher (5.1%, n = 26 vs 1.2%, n = 5, P = 0.001) as well as 30-day mortality (4.0%, n = 20 vs 0.2%, n = 1, P < 0.001) in the infective group compared to the noninfective group. Both subgroups (systemic vs local infection) were balanced for demographics. All-cause major complication including deaths was significantly higher (9.1%, n = 15 vs 3.2%, n = 11, P = 0.008) as well as all-cause 30-day mortality (7.9%, n = 13 vs 2.1%, n = 7, P = 0.003) in the systemic infection subgroup compared to the local infection subgroup.
Patients undergoing TLE for infective indications are at greater risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to noninfective patients. Patients undergoing TLE for systemic infective indications are at greater risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to patients with local infection. Renal impairment, systemic infection, and elevated preprocedure C-reactive protein are independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TLE for an infective indication.
由于感染性和非感染性指征,经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)可能是必要的。我们旨在确定30天死亡率的预测因素以及感染性与非感染性组之间、全身感染与局部感染亚组之间的危险因素。
前瞻性收集了2000年10月至2016年12月期间共925例TLE病例,并进行二分法分类(感染性组n = 505例 vs 非感染性组n = 420例,全身感染n = 164例 vs 局部感染n = 341例)。
与非感染性组相比,包括死亡在内的全因主要并发症(5.1%,n = 26例 vs 1.2%,n = 5例,P = 0.001)以及30天死亡率(4.0%,n = 20例 vs 0.2%,n = 1例,P < 0.001)在感染性组中显著更高。两个亚组(全身感染与局部感染)在人口统计学方面是均衡的。与局部感染亚组相比,包括死亡在内的全因主要并发症(9.1%,n = 15例 vs 3.2%,n = 11例,P = 0.008)以及全因30天死亡率(7.9%,n = 13例 vs 2.1%,n = 7例,P = 0.003)在全身感染亚组中显著更高。
与非感染性患者相比,因感染性指征接受TLE的患者30天全因死亡率风险更高。与局部感染患者相比,因全身感染性指征接受TLE的患者30天全因死亡率风险更高。肾功能损害、全身感染和术前C反应蛋白升高是因感染性指征接受TLE的患者30天全因死亡率的独立预测因素。