Mehta Vishal S, Elliott Mark K, Sidhu Baldeep S, Gould Justin, Kemp Tiffany, Vergani Vittoria, Kadiwar Suraj, Shetty Anoop Kumar, Blauth Christopher, Gill Jaswinder, Bosco Paolo, Rinaldi Christopher A
Cardiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Cardiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep;18(9):1566-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 10.
Long-term outcomes are poorly understood, and data in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) are lacking.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors influencing survival in patients undergoing TLE depending on extraction indication.
Clinical data from consecutive patients undergoing TLE in the reference center between 2000 and 2019 were prospectively collected. The total cohort was divided into groups depending on whether there was an infective or noninfective indication for TLE. We evaluated the association of demographic, clinical, and device-related and procedure-related factors on mortality.
A total of 1151 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 66 months, and mortality was 34.2% (n = 392). Of these patients, 632 (54.9%) and 519 (45.1%) were for infective and noninfective indications, respectively. A higher proportion in the infection group died (38.6% vs 28.5%; P <.001). In the total cohort, multivariable analysis demonstrated increased mortality risk with age >75 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.35-3.78; P <.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.31-2.13; P <.001), higher cumulative comorbidity (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.09-1.26; P <.001), reduced risk per percentage increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; P <.001), and near unity per year of additional lead dwell time (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-1.00; P = .037). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated worse prognosis, with a higher number of leads extracted and increasing comorbidities.
Long-term mortality for patients undergoing TLE remains high. Consensus guidelines recommend evaluating risk for major complications when determining whether to proceed with TLE. This study suggests also assessing longer-term outcomes when considering TLE in those with a high risk of medium- and long-term mortality, particularly for noninfective indications.
长期预后情况鲜为人知,且缺乏经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)患者的数据。
本研究旨在评估根据拔除指征影响TLE患者生存的因素。
前瞻性收集2000年至2019年在参考中心接受TLE的连续患者的临床数据。根据TLE是否有感染性或非感染性指征将整个队列分为几组。我们评估了人口统计学、临床、器械相关和手术相关因素与死亡率的关联。
共纳入1151例患者。平均随访66个月,死亡率为34.2%(n = 392)。在这些患者中,分别有632例(54.9%)和519例(45.1%)因感染性和非感染性指征接受治疗。感染组死亡比例更高(38.6%对28.5%;P <.001)。在整个队列中,多变量分析显示,年龄>75岁(风险比[HR] 2.98;95%置信区间[CI] 2.35 - 3.78;P <.001)、估计肾小球滤过率<60 mL/min/1.73 m²(HR 1.67;95% CI 1.31 - 2.13;P <.001)、累积合并症较高(HR 1.17;95% CI 1.09 - 1.26;P <.001)、左心室射血分数每增加一个百分点风险降低(HR 0.98;95% CI 0.97 - 0.99;P <.001)以及每增加一年导线留置时间风险接近统一(HR 0.98;95% CI 0.96 - 1.00;P = 0.037)与死亡率增加相关。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示预后较差,拔除的导线数量越多且合并症增加时预后更差。
接受TLE的患者长期死亡率仍然很高。共识指南建议在决定是否进行TLE时评估主要并发症的风险。本研究还表明,对于中长期死亡风险高的患者,尤其是非感染性指征患者,在考虑TLE时也应评估长期预后。