Suppr超能文献

全身性心脏装置相关感染患者经静脉导线拔除术的程序性结果及风险预测:一项GALLERY亚组分析

Transvenous lead extraction in patients with systemic cardiac device-related infection-Procedural outcome and risk prediction: A GALLERY subgroup analysis.

作者信息

Chung Da-Un, Burger Heiko, Kaiser Lukas, Osswald Brigitte, Bärsch Volker, Nägele Herbert, Knaut Michael, Reichenspurner Hermann, Gessler Nele, Willems Stephan, Butter Christian, Pecha Simon, Hakmi Samer

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2023 Feb;20(2):181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has evolved as one of the most crucial treatment options for patients with cardiac device-related systemic infection (CDRSI).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the procedural outcome and risk factors of patients with CDRSI undergoing TLE.

METHODS

A subgroup analysis of patients with CDRSI of the GALLERY (GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY) database was performed. Predictors for complications, procedural failure, and all-cause mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 722 patients (28.6%) in the GALLERY had "systemic infection" as extraction indication. Patients with CDRSI were older (70.1 ± 12.2 years vs 67.3 ± 14.3 years; P < .001) and had more comorbidities than patients with local infections or noninfectious extraction indications. There were no differences in complete procedural success (90.6% vs 91.7%; P = .328) or major complications (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .416) but increased procedure-related (1.4% vs 0.3%; P = .003) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 0.6%; P < .001) for patients with CDRSI. Multivariate analyses revealed lead age ≥10 years as a predictor for procedural complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-6.60; P = .001). Lead age ≥10 years (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.03-6.46; P = .04) was also a predictor for procedural failure. We identified left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.00-2.99; P = .049), age ≥75 years (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.27-3.48; P = .004), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.17-3.14; P = .01), and overall procedural complications (OR 5.15; 95% CI 2.44-10.84; P < .001) as predictors for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CDRSI undergoing TLE demonstrate an increased rate of all-cause in-hospital, as well as procedure-related mortality, despite having comparable procedural success rates. Given these data, it seems paramount to develop preventive strategies to detect and treat CDRSI in its earliest stages.

摘要

背景

经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)已发展成为治疗心脏装置相关全身感染(CDRSI)患者的最重要治疗选择之一。

目的

本研究旨在描述接受TLE的CDRSI患者的手术结果和危险因素。

方法

对GALLERY(德国激光导线拔除注册研究)数据库中CDRSI患者进行亚组分析。评估并发症、手术失败和全因死亡率的预测因素。

结果

GALLERY中共有722例患者(28.6%)以“全身感染”作为拔除指征。与局部感染或非感染性拔除指征的患者相比,CDRSI患者年龄更大(70.1±12.2岁 vs 67.3±14.3岁;P<.001)且合并症更多。CDRSI患者的完全手术成功率(90.6% vs 91.7%;P = 0.328)或主要并发症发生率(2.5% vs 1.9%;P = 0.416)无差异,但手术相关(1.4% vs 0.3%;P = 0.003)和全因住院死亡率(11.1% vs 0.6%;P<.001)增加。多因素分析显示导线使用年限≥10年是手术并发症的预测因素(比值比[OR]3.23;95%置信区间[CI]1.58 - 6.60;P = 0.001)。导线使用年限≥10年(OR 2.57;95%CI 1.03 - 6.46;P = 0.04)也是手术失败的预测因素。我们确定左心室射血分数<30%(OR 1.70;95%CI 1.00 - 2.99;P = 0.049)、年龄≥75岁(OR 2.1;95%CI 1.27 - 3.48;P = 0.004)、慢性肾脏病(OR 1.92;95%CI 1.17 - 3.14;P = 0.01)和总体手术并发症(OR 5.15;95%CI 2.44 - 10.84;P<.001)是全因死亡率的预测因素。

结论

接受TLE的CDRSI患者尽管手术成功率相当,但全因住院率以及手术相关死亡率均有所增加。鉴于这些数据,制定在最早阶段检测和治疗CDRSI的预防策略似乎至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验