Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Departmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Department of Neuroradiology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug;29(8):3959-3967. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5803-6. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
After the initial report in 2014 on T1-weighted (T1w) hyperintensity of deep brain nuclei following serial injections of linear gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), a multitude of studies on the potential of the marketed GBCAs to cause T1w hyperintensity in the brain have been published. The vast majority of these studies found a signal intensity (SI) increase for linear GBCAs in the brain-first and foremost in the dentate nucleus-while no SI increase was found for macrocyclic GBCAs. However, the scientific debate about this finding is kept alive by the fact that SI differences do not unequivocally represent the amount of gadolinium retained. Since the study design of the SI measurement in various brain structures is relatively simple, MRI studies investigating gadolinium-dependent T1w hyperintensity are currently conducted at multiple institutions worldwide. However, methodological mistakes may result in flawed conclusions. In this position statement, we assess the methodological basis of the published retrospective studies and define quality standards for future studies to give guidance to the scientific community and to help identify studies with potentially flawed methodology and misleading results. KEY POINTS: • A multitude of studies has been published on the potential of the marketed GBCAs to cause T1w hyperintensity in the brain. • The gadolinium-dependent T1w hyperintensity in the brain depends on patient's history, types of GBCAs used (i.e., linear vs. macrocyclic GBCAs) and MR imaging setup and protocols. • Quality standards for the design of future studies are needed to standardize methodology and avoid potentially misleading results from retrospective studies.
在 2014 年首次报道线性钆基对比剂(GBCA)连续注射后深部脑核 T1 加权(T1w)高信号后,大量研究已发表了市售 GBCA 引起脑 T1w 高信号的潜力。这些研究绝大多数发现线性 GBCA 在大脑中的信号强度(SI)增加,首先是齿状核-而大环 GBCA 则未发现 SI 增加。然而,由于 SI 差异并不明确代表钆的保留量,因此该发现的科学争论仍在继续。由于各种脑结构中 SI 测量的研究设计相对简单,目前全球多个机构正在进行 MRI 研究以调查与钆依赖性 T1w 高信号相关的问题。然而,方法学错误可能导致有缺陷的结论。在本立场声明中,我们评估了已发表的回顾性研究的方法学基础,并为未来的研究定义了质量标准,以指导科学界并帮助识别可能存在方法学缺陷和误导性结果的研究。要点:
大量研究已发表了市售 GBCA 引起脑 T1w 高信号的潜力。
脑内与钆相关的 T1w 高信号取决于患者病史、使用的 GBCA 类型(即线性与大环 GBCA)以及 MR 成像设置和方案。
需要为未来研究的设计制定质量标准,以标准化方法并避免回顾性研究产生潜在误导性的结果。