Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
J Healthc Manag. 2018 Nov-Dec;63(6):374-381. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-17-00178.
This study aimed to examine whether specific cost categories were disproportionately affected by accountable care organizations (ACOs) in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) achieving overall spending reductions, and whether there were demonstrable differences in spending patterns between "low"- or "high"-cost ACOs. Using financial data obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for ACOs launched between 2012 and 2015, and employing a cross-sectional study design, we determined which cost categories were associated with overall reductions in ACO spending. Linear regressions were conducted to discern whether reductions in inpatient and skilled nursing facility (SNF) costs were driven by reductions in the number of admissions or in the cost per admission. Results showed that ACOs that reduced total per capita spending saw the largest percentage decreases in inpatient (-9%), hospice (-11%), and SNF (-16%) per capita costs, compared to ACOs that were unable to decrease costs between 2014 and 2015 (p < .05). Reductions in SNF and inpatient spending were driven by declines in the number of patients admitted, not the cost per hospitalization or SNF admission (p < .05). In 2015, ACOs in the highest decile of per capita spending spent more than double on each beneficiary compared to ACOs in the lowest decile ($16,672 versus $8,030, respectively; p < .05). ACOs in the lowest-cost decile spent more proportionally on outpatient and physician/supplier costs (p < .05). Thus, we determined that initial success in reducing the cost of care has been driven by reductions in inpatient costs due to a decline in the volume of patients admitted. Future studies should further investigate specific interventions that allow high-performing ACOs to achieve these cost reductions.
本研究旨在考察在医疗保险共享储蓄计划(MSSP)中实现总支出减少的情况下,问责制医疗保健组织(ACO)是否对特定成本类别产生不成比例的影响,以及“低”或“高”成本 ACO 之间的支出模式是否存在明显差异。我们使用从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心获得的、针对 2012 年至 2015 年间推出的 ACO 的财务数据,并采用横断面研究设计,确定与 ACO 支出总体减少相关的成本类别。进行线性回归以确定住院和熟练护理设施(SNF)成本的减少是否是由于入院人数或每次入院成本的减少所致。结果表明,与 2014 年至 2015 年期间无法降低成本的 ACO 相比,降低人均总支出的 ACO 看到住院(-9%)、临终关怀(-11%)和 SNF(-16%)人均成本的降幅最大(p <.05)。SNF 和住院支出的减少是由于入院人数减少所致,而不是每次住院或 SNF 入院的成本(p <.05)。2015 年,人均支出最高的 ACO 每一位受益人支出是人均支出最低的 ACO 的两倍多(分别为 16672 美元和 8030 美元;p <.05)。支出最低的 ACO 更多地将支出用于门诊和医生/供应商的费用(p <.05)。因此,我们确定,降低医疗保健成本的初步成功是由于入院患者数量减少导致住院费用降低所致。未来的研究应进一步调查允许高绩效 ACO 实现这些成本降低的具体干预措施。