Suppr超能文献

伤口摄影在外科部位感染的远程术后评估中的应用评价。

Evaluation of Wound Photography for Remote Postoperative Assessment of Surgical Site Infections.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):117-124. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3861.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Surgeons are increasingly interested in using mobile and online applications with wound photography to monitor patients after surgery. Early work using remote care to diagnose surgical site infections (SSIs) demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy using wound photographs to augment patients' electronic reports of symptoms, but it is unclear whether these findings are reproducible in real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how wound photography affects surgeons' abilities to diagnose SSIs in a pragmatic setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective study compared surgeons' paired assessments of postabdominal surgery case vignettes with vs without wound photography for detection of SSIs. Data for case vignettes were collected prospectively from May 1, 2007, to January 31, 2009, at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and from July 1, 2015, to February 29, 2016, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. The surgeons were members of the American Medical Association whose self-designated specialty is general, abdominal, colorectal, oncologic, or vascular surgery and who completed internet-based assessments from May 21 to June 10, 2016.

INTERVENTION

Surgeons reviewed online clinical vignettes with or without wound photography.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Surgeons' diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, confidence, and proposed management with respect to SSIs.

RESULTS

A total of 523 surgeons (113 women and 410 men; mean [SD] age, 53 [10] years) completed a mean of 2.9 clinical vignettes. For the diagnosis of SSIs, the addition of wound photography did not change accuracy (863 of 1512 [57.1%] without and 878 of 1512 [58.1%] with photographs). Photographs decreased sensitivity (from 0.58 to 0.50) but increased specificity (from 0.56 to 0.63). In 415 of 1512 cases (27.4%), the addition of wound photography changed the surgeons' assessment (215 of 1512 [14.2%] changed from incorrect to correct and 200 of 1512 [13.2%] changed from correct to incorrect). Surgeons reported greater confidence when vignettes included a wound photograph compared with vignettes without a wound photograph, regardless of whether they correctly identified an SSI (median, 8 [interquartile range, 6-9] vs median, 8 [interquartile range, 7-9]; P < .001) but they were more likely to undertriage patients when vignettes included a wound photograph, regardless of whether they correctly identified an SSI.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In a practical simulation, wound photography increased specificity and surgeon confidence, but worsened sensitivity for detection of SSIs. Remote evaluation of patient-generated wound photographs may not accurately reflect the clinical state of surgical incisions. Effective widespread implementation of remote postoperative assessment with photography may require additional development of tools, participant training, and mechanisms to verify image quality.

摘要

重要性

外科医生越来越有兴趣使用带有伤口摄影的移动和在线应用程序来监测手术后的患者。早期使用远程护理来诊断手术部位感染(SSI)的工作表明,使用伤口照片来补充患者电子报告的症状可提高诊断准确性,但尚不清楚这些发现是否可以在实际实践中重现。

目的

确定伤口摄影如何影响外科医生在实际环境中诊断 SSI 的能力。

设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性研究比较了外科医生对腹部手术后案例小插曲的配对评估,以及是否使用伤口摄影来检测 SSI。案例小插曲的数据从 2007 年 5 月 1 日至 2009 年 1 月 31 日在荷兰鹿特丹伊拉斯谟大学医学中心前瞻性收集,从 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 2 月 29 日在田纳西州纳什维尔范德比尔特大学医学中心收集。外科医生是美国医学协会的成员,他们的专业领域是普通、腹部、结直肠、肿瘤或血管外科,并于 2016 年 5 月 21 日至 6 月 10 日完成了基于互联网的评估。

干预

外科医生在线查看有或没有伤口摄影的临床案例。

主要结果和措施

外科医生对 SSI 的诊断准确性、敏感性、特异性、信心以及提出的管理建议。

结果

共有 523 名外科医生(113 名女性和 410 名男性;平均[SD]年龄,53[10]岁)平均完成了 2.9 个临床案例。对于 SSI 的诊断,添加伤口摄影并没有改变准确性(无照片 1512 例中的 863 例[57.1%]和有照片 1512 例中的 878 例[58.1%])。照片降低了敏感性(从 0.58 降至 0.50),但提高了特异性(从 0.56 升至 0.63)。在 1512 例中的 415 例(27.4%)中,添加伤口摄影改变了外科医生的评估(1512 例中的 215 例[14.2%]从不正确改为正确,1512 例中的 200 例[13.2%]从正确改为不正确)。无论他们是否正确识别 SSI,与没有伤口照片的案例相比,外科医生报告说,当案例包含伤口照片时,他们的信心更大(中位数,8[四分位距,6-9]与中位数,8[四分位距,7-9];P < .001),但当案例包含伤口照片时,他们更有可能对患者进行过度分诊,无论他们是否正确识别 SSI。

结论和相关性

在实际模拟中,伤口摄影提高了特异性和外科医生的信心,但降低了 SSI 检测的敏感性。远程评估患者生成的伤口照片可能无法准确反映手术切口的临床状态。要有效广泛地实施带有摄影的远程术后评估,可能需要进一步开发工具、参与者培训和验证图像质量的机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Infection assessment tools for acute and chronic wounds: a scoping review.急慢性伤口感染评估工具:一项范围综述
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 May 2;59:e20240392. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0392en. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient decision making in recovering from surgery.患者术后康复过程中的决策制定。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1170658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170658. eCollection 2023.
4
Telemedicine and the standard of care: a call for a new approach?远程医疗与医疗标准:呼唤新方法?
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:1184971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1184971. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验