Bossaert L L, Demey H E, Colemont L J, Beaucourt L, Fierens H, Dirix L, Pintens H
Department of Intensive Care, University of Antwerp-University Hospital, Belgium.
Crit Care Med. 1988 Sep;16(9):823-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198809000-00001.
In cooperation with a group of general practitioners (GP), we investigated the possible risk and benefit of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) at the patient's home. During a 14-month period, 58 patients with suspected AMI were evaluated by their GP using a protocol with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The GP alerted a special mobile intervention team which administered APSAC at home in 13 of the 19 patients. Coronary reperfusion was achieved in ten of these 13 patients. Apart from short and easily treated episodes of bradycardia and/or hypotension after the injection of the thrombolytic drug in four of 13 patients, no major adverse events were noted in the early treatment period. The estimated time gain by treating the patient at home instead of starting the treatment in the coronary care unit was 46 +/- 14 min. Therefore, at-home initiation of thrombolytic treatment seems feasible, fast, and safe.
我们与一组全科医生(GP)合作,调查了在患者家中使用茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)进行院前溶栓治疗的潜在风险和益处。在14个月的时间里,58例疑似AMI患者由其全科医生按照严格的纳入和排除标准进行评估。全科医生通知了一个特殊的移动干预小组,该小组在19例患者中的13例患者家中给予了APSAC。这13例患者中有10例实现了冠状动脉再灌注。除了13例患者中有4例在注射溶栓药物后出现短暂且易于治疗的心动过缓和/或低血压外,在早期治疗期间未观察到重大不良事件。与在冠心病监护病房开始治疗相比,在家中治疗患者估计节省的时间为46 +/- 14分钟。因此,在家中开始溶栓治疗似乎是可行、快速且安全的。