• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国城乡住宅能源消费的比较分析:决定因素与区域差异。

A Comparative Analysis of Residential Energy Consumption in Urban and Rural China: Determinants and Regional Disparities.

机构信息

School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 9;15(11):2507. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112507.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15112507
PMID:30423924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6265837/
Abstract

Residential energy consumption (REC) has become increasingly important in constructing an energy-saving and environment-friendly society in China. The main purpose of this study is to provide a more in-depth analysis of the determinants of REC from an urban-rural segregation perspective, and quantify the contributions of individual determinants to the regional disparities of REC. Based on the extended STIRPAT (the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology) model, seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) estimation is employed to examine the impacts of various determinants of urban REC per capita (URECP) and rural REC per capita (RRECP) in a sample of China's 30 provinces over the period 2007⁻2016. Then, following the results of SUR, this paper tries to explore the reasons for interprovincial disparities of URECP and RRECP by using the Shapley value decomposition. The empirical results show that income level and heating lead to an increase in URECP, while other factors, including the share of natural gas, average temperature, child dependency ratio and gross dependency ratio, significantly decrease URECP. In terms of RRECP, it is shown that old-age dependency ratio, income level and the share of coal consumption positively influence RRECP, while average temperature has a negative effect on RRECP. Specially, the effect of gross dependency ratio on RRECP is positive, indicating the non-working-age population causes more energy use than the working-age population in rural areas. According to the Shapley decomposition, rather than social-economic variables, climate and heating factors contribute the most to the interprovincial differences in URECP. Furthermore, it is found that income level is the most important factor accounting for inter-provincial differences in RRECP. The findings of this research are of great interest, not only to scholars in REC-related fields, but also to decision makers.

摘要

住宅能源消耗(REC)在中国建设节能和环保型社会中变得越来越重要。本研究的主要目的是从城乡隔离的角度对 REC 的决定因素进行更深入的分析,并量化各个决定因素对 REC 地区差异的贡献。基于扩展的 STIRPAT(人口、富裕和技术对冲击的随机影响)模型,采用似不相关回归(SUR)估计来检验 2007 年至 2016 年期间中国 30 个省份人均城市 REC(URECP)和人均农村 REC(RRECP)的各种决定因素的影响。然后,根据 SUR 的结果,本文试图通过使用 Shapley 值分解来探索 URECP 和 RRECP 省际差异的原因。实证结果表明,收入水平和供暖导致 URECP 增加,而天然气份额、平均温度、儿童抚养比和总抚养比等其他因素则显著降低 URECP。就 RRECP 而言,表明老年抚养比、收入水平和煤炭消费份额对 RRECP 产生积极影响,而平均温度对 RRECP 产生负面影响。特别地,总抚养比对 RRECP 的影响是正的,这表明农村地区的非劳动年龄人口比劳动年龄人口消耗更多的能源。根据 Shapley 分解,对 URECP 省际差异贡献最大的不是社会经济变量,而是气候和供暖因素。此外,研究发现,收入水平是造成 RRECP 省际差异的最重要因素。本研究的结果不仅对 REC 相关领域的学者,而且对决策者都具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/097104345986/ijerph-15-02507-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/039bb1f3a7a7/ijerph-15-02507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/20b87816dbb0/ijerph-15-02507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/3db812b7fc6b/ijerph-15-02507-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/7d4d118ea209/ijerph-15-02507-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/6a384f28f8f2/ijerph-15-02507-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/da6e6ca0e2fa/ijerph-15-02507-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/a046cdc38a83/ijerph-15-02507-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/b94f7eeab61d/ijerph-15-02507-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/097104345986/ijerph-15-02507-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/039bb1f3a7a7/ijerph-15-02507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/20b87816dbb0/ijerph-15-02507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/3db812b7fc6b/ijerph-15-02507-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/7d4d118ea209/ijerph-15-02507-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/6a384f28f8f2/ijerph-15-02507-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/da6e6ca0e2fa/ijerph-15-02507-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/a046cdc38a83/ijerph-15-02507-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/b94f7eeab61d/ijerph-15-02507-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6265837/097104345986/ijerph-15-02507-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Residential Energy Consumption in Urban and Rural China: Determinants and Regional Disparities.中国城乡住宅能源消费的比较分析:决定因素与区域差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 9;15(11):2507. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112507.
2
The impact of climate change on residential energy consumption in urban and rural divided southern and northern China.气候变化对中国南方和北方城乡住宅能源消费的影响。
Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Mar;42(3):969-985. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00430-3. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
3
Urbanization impact on residential energy consumption in China: the roles of income, urbanization level, and urban density.城市化对中国居民能源消费的影响:收入、城市化水平和城市密度的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Feb;26(4):3542-3555. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3863-4. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
4
Village energy survey reveals missing rural raw coal in northern China: Significance in science and policy.村庄能源调查揭示中国北方农村原煤缺失:科学与政策意义。
Environ Pollut. 2017 Apr;223:705-712. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
Per capita CO emission inequality of China's urban and rural residential energy consumption: A Kaya-Theil decomposition.中国城乡居民能源消费的人均碳排放不平等:卡亚-泰尔分解
J Environ Manage. 2023 Apr 1;331:117265. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117265. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
6
Decomposing the causes of socioeconomic-related health inequality among urban and rural populations in China: a new decomposition approach.解析中国城乡人群社会经济相关健康不平等的原因:一种新的分解方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jul 18;16(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0624-9.
7
Different sources of rural household energy consumption and influencing factors in Dazu, China.中国大足农村家庭能源消费的不同来源及其影响因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21312-21320. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05439-w. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Using Panel Data to Evaluate the Factors Affecting Transport Energy Consumption in China's Three Regions.利用面板数据评估中国三大区域运输能源消耗的影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 14;16(4):555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040555.
9
Effective supply of eco-product and its influence factors at provincial scale of China from the perspective of supply-side reform.从供给侧改革视角看中国省级层面生态产品的有效供给及其影响因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Oct;29(10):3326-3336. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.010.
10
The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.中国城乡医保整合下住院医疗净效益的不平等。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 22;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Empirical Study on Households' Energy-Conservation Behavior of Jiangsu Province in China: The Role of Policies and Behavior Results.中国江苏省居民节能行为的实证研究:政策与行为结果的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 15;16(6):939. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060939.

本文引用的文献

1
Which are the factors that may explain the differences in water and energy consumptions in urban and rural environments?哪些因素可以解释城乡环境中水资源和能源消耗的差异?
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Nov 15;642:421-435. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.062. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Air pollutant emission from the underestimated households' coal consumption source in China.中国被低估的家庭煤炭消费源的空气污染物排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 15;580:641-650. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.143. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
3
Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions.
人口与富裕程度对二氧化碳排放的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):175-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.175.
4
Impact of population growth.人口增长的影响。
Science. 1971 Mar 26;171(3977):1212-7. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3977.1212.